半结构化问题情境下中学数学教师的线性关系问题

Q2 Social Sciences
Fadime Ulusoy
{"title":"半结构化问题情境下中学数学教师的线性关系问题","authors":"Fadime Ulusoy","doi":"10.1080/19404476.2023.2272570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study examines in-service mathematics teachers’ problems on linear relationships that they posed in a semi-structured problem posing situation with a group and their ideas about the factors affecting the quality of the posed problems. Eight groups of 24 teachers participated in the study. Teachers' problems, written group work, and class discussion all served as sources of data for this study. The data was mainly analyzed through qualitative methods. The results demonstrate that seven groups’ problems were invalid because the problems did not meet the given conditions in the problem posing task. Their problems mostly lacked key mathematical concepts related to linear graphs, such as linearity, slopes, and y-intercepts. In class discussion, teachers dealt with the following factors that affect the quality of posed problems: misunderstanding of the problem posing situation, making inappropriate mathematical decisions, and using improper mathematical language. This study revealed that more content-focused practices are necessary to support teachers’ problem posing skills.Keywords: in-service teacherslinear graphsproblem posingteacher learning Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 TL = Turkish lira.","PeriodicalId":52178,"journal":{"name":"RMLE Online","volume":"43 33","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Middle Level Mathematics Teachers’ Problems on Linear Relationships in a Semi-Structured Problem Posing Situation\",\"authors\":\"Fadime Ulusoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19404476.2023.2272570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis study examines in-service mathematics teachers’ problems on linear relationships that they posed in a semi-structured problem posing situation with a group and their ideas about the factors affecting the quality of the posed problems. Eight groups of 24 teachers participated in the study. Teachers' problems, written group work, and class discussion all served as sources of data for this study. The data was mainly analyzed through qualitative methods. The results demonstrate that seven groups’ problems were invalid because the problems did not meet the given conditions in the problem posing task. Their problems mostly lacked key mathematical concepts related to linear graphs, such as linearity, slopes, and y-intercepts. In class discussion, teachers dealt with the following factors that affect the quality of posed problems: misunderstanding of the problem posing situation, making inappropriate mathematical decisions, and using improper mathematical language. This study revealed that more content-focused practices are necessary to support teachers’ problem posing skills.Keywords: in-service teacherslinear graphsproblem posingteacher learning Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 TL = Turkish lira.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMLE Online\",\"volume\":\"43 33\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMLE Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2023.2272570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMLE Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2023.2272570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究考察了在职数学教师在半结构化小组出题情境中的线性关系问题及其对出题质量影响因素的看法。8组24名教师参与了这项研究。教师问题、书面小组作业和课堂讨论都是本研究的数据来源。数据分析主要采用定性方法。结果表明,在问题提出任务中,有7组问题由于不满足给定条件而无效。他们的问题大多缺乏与线性图相关的关键数学概念,如线性、斜率和y截距。在课堂讨论中,教师处理了以下影响问题提出质量的因素:对问题提出情况的误解,做出不恰当的数学决策,以及使用不当的数学语言。本研究表明,需要更多以内容为中心的实践来支持教师的问题提出技巧。关键词:在职教师;线性图;教师学习问题;注1里拉=土耳其里拉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Middle Level Mathematics Teachers’ Problems on Linear Relationships in a Semi-Structured Problem Posing Situation
AbstractThis study examines in-service mathematics teachers’ problems on linear relationships that they posed in a semi-structured problem posing situation with a group and their ideas about the factors affecting the quality of the posed problems. Eight groups of 24 teachers participated in the study. Teachers' problems, written group work, and class discussion all served as sources of data for this study. The data was mainly analyzed through qualitative methods. The results demonstrate that seven groups’ problems were invalid because the problems did not meet the given conditions in the problem posing task. Their problems mostly lacked key mathematical concepts related to linear graphs, such as linearity, slopes, and y-intercepts. In class discussion, teachers dealt with the following factors that affect the quality of posed problems: misunderstanding of the problem posing situation, making inappropriate mathematical decisions, and using improper mathematical language. This study revealed that more content-focused practices are necessary to support teachers’ problem posing skills.Keywords: in-service teacherslinear graphsproblem posingteacher learning Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 TL = Turkish lira.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RMLE Online
RMLE Online Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信