T. Wentzel, F. P. Retief, R. C. Alberts, H. J. Moolman, C. Roos, D. P. Cilliers
{"title":"南非多肉卡鲁生物多样性热点地区环境影响评价生物多样性输入质量研究","authors":"T. Wentzel, F. P. Retief, R. C. Alberts, H. J. Moolman, C. Roos, D. P. Cilliers","doi":"10.1142/s1464333223500199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an important environmental policy instrument to proactively inform development decisions that might impact biodiversity, especially in internationally recognised biodiversity hotspots. One such hotspot region is the Succulent Karoo Biodiversity Hotspot (SKBH), known for its rich endemism of flora and fauna. The aim of this research is to determine the quality of biodiversity inputs to EIA in areas with high biodiversity value, such as the SKBH. This was achieved by reviewing the quality of biodiversity inputs to 16 EIAs against a tailor-made review package. The review produced ‘unsatisfactory’ results related to the integration of biodiversity impacts, public participation, and continual monitoring. ‘Satisfactory’ results were achieved for the consideration of ecological approaches, description of the baseline environment, and the application of the precautionary principle. To address the unsatisfactory results, we recommend the development of context specific guidelines dealing with (i) significance thresholds, (ii) alternatives and mitigation, and (iii) monitoring plans. Standard approaches, guidelines, and general competencies do not suffice for EIA in biodiversity hotspots.","PeriodicalId":35909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Quality of Biodiversity Inputs to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the Succulent Karoo Biodiversity Hotspot, South Africa\",\"authors\":\"T. Wentzel, F. P. Retief, R. C. Alberts, H. J. Moolman, C. Roos, D. P. Cilliers\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s1464333223500199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an important environmental policy instrument to proactively inform development decisions that might impact biodiversity, especially in internationally recognised biodiversity hotspots. One such hotspot region is the Succulent Karoo Biodiversity Hotspot (SKBH), known for its rich endemism of flora and fauna. The aim of this research is to determine the quality of biodiversity inputs to EIA in areas with high biodiversity value, such as the SKBH. This was achieved by reviewing the quality of biodiversity inputs to 16 EIAs against a tailor-made review package. The review produced ‘unsatisfactory’ results related to the integration of biodiversity impacts, public participation, and continual monitoring. ‘Satisfactory’ results were achieved for the consideration of ecological approaches, description of the baseline environment, and the application of the precautionary principle. To address the unsatisfactory results, we recommend the development of context specific guidelines dealing with (i) significance thresholds, (ii) alternatives and mitigation, and (iii) monitoring plans. Standard approaches, guidelines, and general competencies do not suffice for EIA in biodiversity hotspots.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333223500199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1464333223500199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Quality of Biodiversity Inputs to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the Succulent Karoo Biodiversity Hotspot, South Africa
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an important environmental policy instrument to proactively inform development decisions that might impact biodiversity, especially in internationally recognised biodiversity hotspots. One such hotspot region is the Succulent Karoo Biodiversity Hotspot (SKBH), known for its rich endemism of flora and fauna. The aim of this research is to determine the quality of biodiversity inputs to EIA in areas with high biodiversity value, such as the SKBH. This was achieved by reviewing the quality of biodiversity inputs to 16 EIAs against a tailor-made review package. The review produced ‘unsatisfactory’ results related to the integration of biodiversity impacts, public participation, and continual monitoring. ‘Satisfactory’ results were achieved for the consideration of ecological approaches, description of the baseline environment, and the application of the precautionary principle. To address the unsatisfactory results, we recommend the development of context specific guidelines dealing with (i) significance thresholds, (ii) alternatives and mitigation, and (iii) monitoring plans. Standard approaches, guidelines, and general competencies do not suffice for EIA in biodiversity hotspots.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management is an interdisciplinary, peer reviewed, international journal covering policy and decision-making relating to environmental assessment (EA) in the broadest sense. Uniquely, its specific aim is to explore the horizontal interactions between assessment and aspects of environmental management (not just the vertical interactions within the broad field of impact assessment) and thereby to identify comprehensive approaches to environmental improvement involving both qualitative and quantitative information. As the concepts associated with sustainable development mature, links between environmental assessment and management systems become all the more essential.