重新思考云计算背景下GDPR下的角色分配

IF 2.6 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Cyril Fischer
{"title":"重新思考云计算背景下GDPR下的角色分配","authors":"Cyril Fischer","doi":"10.1093/idpl/ipad023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract • Cloud computing is a well-established and flourishing phenomenon, whose key activity on personal data is the storage thereof. This study analyses the allocation of the controller–processor roles under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to the cloud computing actors in the context of the storage of personal data. It examines the current controller–processor model and suggests a joint controllership interpretation to the EU regulators, as a more appropriate allocation of roles in the context of cloud computing. • We argue that the prevailing controller–processor interpretation stems from the current primacy of the purpose criterion, as well as the recognition of consent as a criterion to allocate controllership. This article suggests that cloud providers control some of the essential means of the storage of personal data, thereby shifting part of the control from cloud customers to cloud providers. • If the joint controllership approach was to be followed by the EU regulators, this article argues that it would better reflect the economic and technical reality, and provide a more appropriate responsibility and liability framework for cloud providers and customers, which in turn would enhance the level of protection that data subjects should benefit from under the GDPR.","PeriodicalId":51749,"journal":{"name":"International Data Privacy Law","volume":"29 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-thinking the allocation of roles under the GDPR in the context of cloud computing\",\"authors\":\"Cyril Fischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/idpl/ipad023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract • Cloud computing is a well-established and flourishing phenomenon, whose key activity on personal data is the storage thereof. This study analyses the allocation of the controller–processor roles under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to the cloud computing actors in the context of the storage of personal data. It examines the current controller–processor model and suggests a joint controllership interpretation to the EU regulators, as a more appropriate allocation of roles in the context of cloud computing. • We argue that the prevailing controller–processor interpretation stems from the current primacy of the purpose criterion, as well as the recognition of consent as a criterion to allocate controllership. This article suggests that cloud providers control some of the essential means of the storage of personal data, thereby shifting part of the control from cloud customers to cloud providers. • If the joint controllership approach was to be followed by the EU regulators, this article argues that it would better reflect the economic and technical reality, and provide a more appropriate responsibility and liability framework for cloud providers and customers, which in turn would enhance the level of protection that data subjects should benefit from under the GDPR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Data Privacy Law\",\"volume\":\"29 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Data Privacy Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipad023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Data Privacy Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipad023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

•云计算是一种成熟且蓬勃发展的现象,其对个人数据的关键活动是存储个人数据。本研究分析了通用数据保护条例(GDPR)下的控制器-处理器角色在个人数据存储背景下对云计算参与者的分配。它检查了当前的控制器-处理器模型,并向欧盟监管机构提出了联合控制器解释,作为云计算背景下更合适的角色分配。•我们认为,普遍的控制者-处理者解释源于当前首要的目的标准,以及承认同意作为分配控制者身份的标准。本文建议云提供商控制个人数据存储的一些基本手段,从而将部分控制权从云客户转移到云提供商。•如果欧盟监管机构遵循联合控制权方法,本文认为,它将更好地反映经济和技术现实,并为云提供商和客户提供更适当的责任和责任框架,这反过来将提高数据主体应从GDPR下受益的保护水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-thinking the allocation of roles under the GDPR in the context of cloud computing
Abstract • Cloud computing is a well-established and flourishing phenomenon, whose key activity on personal data is the storage thereof. This study analyses the allocation of the controller–processor roles under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) to the cloud computing actors in the context of the storage of personal data. It examines the current controller–processor model and suggests a joint controllership interpretation to the EU regulators, as a more appropriate allocation of roles in the context of cloud computing. • We argue that the prevailing controller–processor interpretation stems from the current primacy of the purpose criterion, as well as the recognition of consent as a criterion to allocate controllership. This article suggests that cloud providers control some of the essential means of the storage of personal data, thereby shifting part of the control from cloud customers to cloud providers. • If the joint controllership approach was to be followed by the EU regulators, this article argues that it would better reflect the economic and technical reality, and provide a more appropriate responsibility and liability framework for cloud providers and customers, which in turn would enhance the level of protection that data subjects should benefit from under the GDPR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信