抵制接受的漫长旅程:从社会科学的角度理解英格兰和威尔士的数字法医鉴定

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Dana Wilson‐Kovacs, David Wyatt
{"title":"抵制接受的漫长旅程:从社会科学的角度理解英格兰和威尔士的数字法医鉴定","authors":"Dana Wilson‐Kovacs, David Wyatt","doi":"10.1002/wfs2.1501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Drawing on topical academic and practitioner accounts, our contribution examines the challenges of accreditation in digital forensics (DF), specifically, the adoption of ISO/IEC 17025 standard for forensic science support providers in England and Wales. We built on the debate generated by the Forensic Science Regulator's introduction of this standard in DF to reflect on the position and status of DF community of practice. We argue that a social science approach can help illuminate the organizational and professional tensions generated by this development and to understand better the implications for the role of DF specialists and their position in the wider forensic science community. This article is categorized under: Digital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime Investigation Crime Scene Investigation > Education and Formation","PeriodicalId":75325,"journal":{"name":"WIREs. Forensic science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The long journey of resistance toward acceptance: Understanding digital forensic accreditation in England and Wales from a social science perspective\",\"authors\":\"Dana Wilson‐Kovacs, David Wyatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wfs2.1501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Drawing on topical academic and practitioner accounts, our contribution examines the challenges of accreditation in digital forensics (DF), specifically, the adoption of ISO/IEC 17025 standard for forensic science support providers in England and Wales. We built on the debate generated by the Forensic Science Regulator's introduction of this standard in DF to reflect on the position and status of DF community of practice. We argue that a social science approach can help illuminate the organizational and professional tensions generated by this development and to understand better the implications for the role of DF specialists and their position in the wider forensic science community. This article is categorized under: Digital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime Investigation Crime Scene Investigation > Education and Formation\",\"PeriodicalId\":75325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIREs. Forensic science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIREs. Forensic science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs. Forensic science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:根据专题学术和从业者账户,我们的贡献研究了数字取证(DF)认证的挑战,特别是采用ISO/IEC 17025标准,为英格兰和威尔士的法医科学支持提供者提供支持。我们以法医学监管机构在DF中引入该标准所产生的争论为基础,反思DF实践社区的立场和地位。我们认为,社会科学方法可以帮助阐明这一发展所产生的组织和专业紧张关系,并更好地理解DF专家的角色及其在更广泛的法医科学界中的地位。本文分类如下:数字与多媒体科学;网络犯罪调查犯罪现场调查教育与形成
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The long journey of resistance toward acceptance: Understanding digital forensic accreditation in England and Wales from a social science perspective
Abstract Drawing on topical academic and practitioner accounts, our contribution examines the challenges of accreditation in digital forensics (DF), specifically, the adoption of ISO/IEC 17025 standard for forensic science support providers in England and Wales. We built on the debate generated by the Forensic Science Regulator's introduction of this standard in DF to reflect on the position and status of DF community of practice. We argue that a social science approach can help illuminate the organizational and professional tensions generated by this development and to understand better the implications for the role of DF specialists and their position in the wider forensic science community. This article is categorized under: Digital and Multimedia Science > Cybercrime Investigation Crime Scene Investigation > Education and Formation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信