地下水中病原体存活:氧化还原和有机物的影响

Louise Weaver, Erin McGill, Panan Sitthirit, Judith Webber, Phil Abraham, Murray Close
{"title":"地下水中病原体存活:氧化还原和有机物的影响","authors":"Louise Weaver, Erin McGill, Panan Sitthirit, Judith Webber, Phil Abraham, Murray Close","doi":"10.3897/aca.6.e108697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microbial pathogen survival within the environment can be variable and can depend on many criteria, including environmental conditions e.g. oxygen concentration, temperature, pH, sunlight, etc. (e.g., Horswell et al. (2010)). Groundwater has been shown to enable the prolonged survival of pathogenic organisms due to the absence of sunlight and relatively stable temperatures (Cook and Bolster 2007). In other studies, however, survival has been lower in groundwater when compared with a sterile environment (e.g. sterilised groundwater or artificial groundwater) due to the presence of competing organisms and adverse conditions of pH and redox. To elucidate these discrepancies two experiments were designed: The first, hypothesised that, due to Campylobacters' low tolerance to high oxygen levels, survival in oxic (dissolved oxygen (DO) levels over 5 mg per L) would be less than in anoxic groundwater (DO levels below 2 mg per L). The second hypothesised that the survival of the pathogen Salmonella typhimurium , in groundwater, will be enhanced by organic carbon. METHODS Campylobacter experiment: Campylobacter jejuni isolated from the Havelock North drinking water source was used (designated HN16) (Gilpin et al. 2020). To compare the survival of the outbreak strain with type strain Campylobacter , NCTC 11351 was used. Salmonella experiment: For this experiment, environmental isolates were used rather than laboratory strains. Salmonella, isolated from a stream in Wellington, New Zealand, was identified as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium . The Escherichia coli used was a phylogroup A, isolated from stream sediment in Whangarei Falls, New Zealand. Mesocosm experiments were established containing groundwater (oxic and anoxic for Campylobacter experiment and ultrafiltered, groundwater, groundwater amended with 1% or 10% dissolved organic carbon (DOC). pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature were monitored over the experimental period. The temperature was maintained at 12-14°C during both experiments. Samples (5 mL) of the groundwater from each jar were taken aseptically at set time points over the experimental period. Samples were then serially diluted in sterile peptone water to give a dilution series from 10 -1 to 10 -4 . Samples were analysed by plating onto selective media. RESULTS Campylobacter experiment: The results presented demonstrated differences in the survival of the two Campylobacter strains tested and differences in survival of Campylobacter HN16 depending on groundwater type. Fig. 1 shows the average concentration of Campylobacter strains in groundwater types over time. The results presented are average of three replicates. Over the whole experimental period survival of Campylobacter HN16 was greatest in anoxic groundwater, and only a 1 log reduction was observed (Fig. 1), equating to a 79.6% survival after 16 days. The die-off rate of Campylobacter HN16 in anoxic groundwater was calculated to be 0.0873 days and T90 6.85 days. Salmonella experiment: Die-of rates for Salmonella were similar over the course of the experiment when no or low levels of DOC were present (Fig. 2a). At high levels of DOC, however, Salmonella showed similar survival to the control. After 84 days only a 1 Log decrease was observed. In comparison, E. coli died off at a faster rate than Salmonella in all mesocosms (Fig. 2). It is interesting to note that in the high DOC mesocosms after day 56 counts of E. coli remained at 10 3 per mL until the end of the experiment. Conclusions and significance Both experiments demonstrated the survival of pathogenic microorganisms in varying groundwater conditions. The variation in the outbreak strain Campylobacter compared to the type strain indicated variation within species that may lead to enhanced survival in the environment. The Salmonella experiment indicated the presence of additional organic carbon can enhance the survival of pathogens in groundwater. In addition, the variation between the microbial indicator E. coli and Salmonella provides evidence of differences in the survival of microbes in the environment and indicates caution is needed when considering the survival of pathogens in groundwater if reliance is made on microbial indicator organisms.","PeriodicalId":101714,"journal":{"name":"ARPHA Conference Abstracts","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathogen survival in groundwater: Influence of redox and organic matter\",\"authors\":\"Louise Weaver, Erin McGill, Panan Sitthirit, Judith Webber, Phil Abraham, Murray Close\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/aca.6.e108697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Microbial pathogen survival within the environment can be variable and can depend on many criteria, including environmental conditions e.g. oxygen concentration, temperature, pH, sunlight, etc. (e.g., Horswell et al. (2010)). Groundwater has been shown to enable the prolonged survival of pathogenic organisms due to the absence of sunlight and relatively stable temperatures (Cook and Bolster 2007). In other studies, however, survival has been lower in groundwater when compared with a sterile environment (e.g. sterilised groundwater or artificial groundwater) due to the presence of competing organisms and adverse conditions of pH and redox. To elucidate these discrepancies two experiments were designed: The first, hypothesised that, due to Campylobacters' low tolerance to high oxygen levels, survival in oxic (dissolved oxygen (DO) levels over 5 mg per L) would be less than in anoxic groundwater (DO levels below 2 mg per L). The second hypothesised that the survival of the pathogen Salmonella typhimurium , in groundwater, will be enhanced by organic carbon. METHODS Campylobacter experiment: Campylobacter jejuni isolated from the Havelock North drinking water source was used (designated HN16) (Gilpin et al. 2020). To compare the survival of the outbreak strain with type strain Campylobacter , NCTC 11351 was used. Salmonella experiment: For this experiment, environmental isolates were used rather than laboratory strains. Salmonella, isolated from a stream in Wellington, New Zealand, was identified as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium . The Escherichia coli used was a phylogroup A, isolated from stream sediment in Whangarei Falls, New Zealand. Mesocosm experiments were established containing groundwater (oxic and anoxic for Campylobacter experiment and ultrafiltered, groundwater, groundwater amended with 1% or 10% dissolved organic carbon (DOC). pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature were monitored over the experimental period. The temperature was maintained at 12-14°C during both experiments. Samples (5 mL) of the groundwater from each jar were taken aseptically at set time points over the experimental period. Samples were then serially diluted in sterile peptone water to give a dilution series from 10 -1 to 10 -4 . Samples were analysed by plating onto selective media. RESULTS Campylobacter experiment: The results presented demonstrated differences in the survival of the two Campylobacter strains tested and differences in survival of Campylobacter HN16 depending on groundwater type. Fig. 1 shows the average concentration of Campylobacter strains in groundwater types over time. The results presented are average of three replicates. Over the whole experimental period survival of Campylobacter HN16 was greatest in anoxic groundwater, and only a 1 log reduction was observed (Fig. 1), equating to a 79.6% survival after 16 days. The die-off rate of Campylobacter HN16 in anoxic groundwater was calculated to be 0.0873 days and T90 6.85 days. Salmonella experiment: Die-of rates for Salmonella were similar over the course of the experiment when no or low levels of DOC were present (Fig. 2a). At high levels of DOC, however, Salmonella showed similar survival to the control. After 84 days only a 1 Log decrease was observed. In comparison, E. coli died off at a faster rate than Salmonella in all mesocosms (Fig. 2). It is interesting to note that in the high DOC mesocosms after day 56 counts of E. coli remained at 10 3 per mL until the end of the experiment. Conclusions and significance Both experiments demonstrated the survival of pathogenic microorganisms in varying groundwater conditions. The variation in the outbreak strain Campylobacter compared to the type strain indicated variation within species that may lead to enhanced survival in the environment. The Salmonella experiment indicated the presence of additional organic carbon can enhance the survival of pathogens in groundwater. In addition, the variation between the microbial indicator E. coli and Salmonella provides evidence of differences in the survival of microbes in the environment and indicates caution is needed when considering the survival of pathogens in groundwater if reliance is made on microbial indicator organisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARPHA Conference Abstracts\",\"volume\":\"105 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARPHA Conference Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.6.e108697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARPHA Conference Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.6.e108697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微生物病原体在环境中的生存可能是可变的,并且可能取决于许多标准,包括环境条件,例如氧气浓度、温度、pH值、阳光等(例如,Horswell等人(2010))。由于缺乏阳光和相对稳定的温度,地下水已被证明能够延长病原生物的生存时间(Cook and加强,2007)。然而,在其他研究中,由于存在竞争生物以及不利的pH和氧化还原条件,与无菌环境(例如无菌地下水或人工地下水)相比,地下水中的存活率较低。为了阐明这些差异,设计了两个实验:第一个假设,由于弯曲杆菌对高氧水平的耐受性较低,在氧气(溶解氧(DO)水平超过5 mg / L)中的存活率将低于缺氧地下水(DO水平低于2 mg / L)。第二个假设,病原体鼠伤寒沙门氏菌在地下水中的存活率将被有机碳提高。方法弯曲菌实验:采用从Havelock North饮用水源分离的空肠弯曲菌(编号HN16) (Gilpin et al. 2020)。为了比较爆发菌株与弯曲杆菌型菌株的存活率,使用了NCTC 11351。沙门氏菌实验:本实验采用环境分离菌而非实验室菌株。从新西兰惠灵顿的一条溪流中分离出的沙门氏菌被鉴定为肠沙门氏菌血清型鼠伤寒沙门氏菌。使用的大肠杆菌是一个系统群a,从新西兰旺阿雷瀑布的溪流沉积物中分离出来。建立了含地下水(弯曲杆菌实验含氧和缺氧)和超滤、地下水、添加1%或10%溶解有机碳(DOC)的地下水的中生态实验。在实验期间监测pH、溶解氧(DO)和温度。两组实验温度均保持在12-14℃。在实验期间的设定时间点,从每个罐子中无菌抽取5 mL的地下水样本。然后将样品在无菌蛋白胨水中连续稀释,得到从10 -1到10 -4的稀释系列。样品通过电镀在选择性介质上进行分析。结果弯曲杆菌实验:结果显示,两种弯曲杆菌的存活率存在差异,HN16弯曲杆菌的存活率也因地下水类型的不同而存在差异。图1显示了地下水类型中弯曲杆菌菌株随时间的平均浓度。所得结果为三次重复的平均值。在整个实验期间,HN16弯曲杆菌在缺氧地下水中的存活率最高,仅下降了1 log(图1),相当于16天后的存活率为79.6%。计算出缺氧地下水中弯曲杆菌HN16的死亡时间为0.0873 d, T90为6.85 d。沙门氏菌实验:在实验过程中,当没有或低水平DOC存在时,沙门氏菌的死亡率相似(图2a)。然而,在高水平的DOC下,沙门氏菌的存活率与对照组相似。84天后,仅观察到1 Log的下降。相比之下,大肠杆菌在所有中菌群中的死亡速度都快于沙门氏菌(图2)。有趣的是,在56天后的高DOC中,大肠杆菌计数保持在每mL 103,直到实验结束。结论与意义两项实验均证实了病原菌在不同地下水条件下的生存能力。与型菌株相比,爆发菌株弯曲杆菌的变异表明物种内的变异可能导致在环境中的存活率提高。沙门氏菌实验表明,添加有机碳可以提高地下水中病原菌的存活率。此外,微生物指示物大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌之间的差异提供了微生物在环境中生存差异的证据,并表明如果依赖微生物指示物,则在考虑地下水中病原体的生存时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathogen survival in groundwater: Influence of redox and organic matter
Microbial pathogen survival within the environment can be variable and can depend on many criteria, including environmental conditions e.g. oxygen concentration, temperature, pH, sunlight, etc. (e.g., Horswell et al. (2010)). Groundwater has been shown to enable the prolonged survival of pathogenic organisms due to the absence of sunlight and relatively stable temperatures (Cook and Bolster 2007). In other studies, however, survival has been lower in groundwater when compared with a sterile environment (e.g. sterilised groundwater or artificial groundwater) due to the presence of competing organisms and adverse conditions of pH and redox. To elucidate these discrepancies two experiments were designed: The first, hypothesised that, due to Campylobacters' low tolerance to high oxygen levels, survival in oxic (dissolved oxygen (DO) levels over 5 mg per L) would be less than in anoxic groundwater (DO levels below 2 mg per L). The second hypothesised that the survival of the pathogen Salmonella typhimurium , in groundwater, will be enhanced by organic carbon. METHODS Campylobacter experiment: Campylobacter jejuni isolated from the Havelock North drinking water source was used (designated HN16) (Gilpin et al. 2020). To compare the survival of the outbreak strain with type strain Campylobacter , NCTC 11351 was used. Salmonella experiment: For this experiment, environmental isolates were used rather than laboratory strains. Salmonella, isolated from a stream in Wellington, New Zealand, was identified as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium . The Escherichia coli used was a phylogroup A, isolated from stream sediment in Whangarei Falls, New Zealand. Mesocosm experiments were established containing groundwater (oxic and anoxic for Campylobacter experiment and ultrafiltered, groundwater, groundwater amended with 1% or 10% dissolved organic carbon (DOC). pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature were monitored over the experimental period. The temperature was maintained at 12-14°C during both experiments. Samples (5 mL) of the groundwater from each jar were taken aseptically at set time points over the experimental period. Samples were then serially diluted in sterile peptone water to give a dilution series from 10 -1 to 10 -4 . Samples were analysed by plating onto selective media. RESULTS Campylobacter experiment: The results presented demonstrated differences in the survival of the two Campylobacter strains tested and differences in survival of Campylobacter HN16 depending on groundwater type. Fig. 1 shows the average concentration of Campylobacter strains in groundwater types over time. The results presented are average of three replicates. Over the whole experimental period survival of Campylobacter HN16 was greatest in anoxic groundwater, and only a 1 log reduction was observed (Fig. 1), equating to a 79.6% survival after 16 days. The die-off rate of Campylobacter HN16 in anoxic groundwater was calculated to be 0.0873 days and T90 6.85 days. Salmonella experiment: Die-of rates for Salmonella were similar over the course of the experiment when no or low levels of DOC were present (Fig. 2a). At high levels of DOC, however, Salmonella showed similar survival to the control. After 84 days only a 1 Log decrease was observed. In comparison, E. coli died off at a faster rate than Salmonella in all mesocosms (Fig. 2). It is interesting to note that in the high DOC mesocosms after day 56 counts of E. coli remained at 10 3 per mL until the end of the experiment. Conclusions and significance Both experiments demonstrated the survival of pathogenic microorganisms in varying groundwater conditions. The variation in the outbreak strain Campylobacter compared to the type strain indicated variation within species that may lead to enhanced survival in the environment. The Salmonella experiment indicated the presence of additional organic carbon can enhance the survival of pathogens in groundwater. In addition, the variation between the microbial indicator E. coli and Salmonella provides evidence of differences in the survival of microbes in the environment and indicates caution is needed when considering the survival of pathogens in groundwater if reliance is made on microbial indicator organisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信