佩雷斯诉斯特吉斯公立学校(2017):最高法院关于特殊教育穷竭要求的规则

IF 0.7 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Mitchell L. Yell, Michael A. Couvillon, Antonis Katsiyannis
{"title":"佩雷斯诉斯特吉斯公立学校(2017):最高法院关于特殊教育穷竭要求的规则","authors":"Mitchell L. Yell, Michael A. Couvillon, Antonis Katsiyannis","doi":"10.1177/10534512231204302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Supreme Court has heard several cases regarding special education. These cases have resulted in decisions that have addressed issues involving special education programming and procedural issues. On March 21, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools. This decision, which was the most recent special education case heard by the highest court in the United States, involved litigation in special education. In this brief article, we address the Supreme Court’s decision in Perez by (a) examining the background of the case, (b) reviewing the decision by the lower courts and the U.S. Supreme Court, and (c) discussing the implications of the case for special educators.","PeriodicalId":14475,"journal":{"name":"Intervention in School and Clinic","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perez v. Sturgis Public School (2017): The Supreme Court Rules on the Special Education Exhaustion Requirement\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell L. Yell, Michael A. Couvillon, Antonis Katsiyannis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10534512231204302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The U.S. Supreme Court has heard several cases regarding special education. These cases have resulted in decisions that have addressed issues involving special education programming and procedural issues. On March 21, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools. This decision, which was the most recent special education case heard by the highest court in the United States, involved litigation in special education. In this brief article, we address the Supreme Court’s decision in Perez by (a) examining the background of the case, (b) reviewing the decision by the lower courts and the U.S. Supreme Court, and (c) discussing the implications of the case for special educators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intervention in School and Clinic\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intervention in School and Clinic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512231204302\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intervention in School and Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512231204302","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国最高法院已经审理了几起关于特殊教育的案件。这些案件所产生的裁决涉及特殊教育方案编制和程序问题。2023年3月21日,美国最高法院在佩雷斯诉斯特吉斯公立学校案中一致作出裁决。这一判决是美国最高法院审理的最近一起特殊教育案件,涉及特殊教育诉讼。在这篇简短的文章中,我们通过(a)审查案件的背景,(b)审查下级法院和美国最高法院的决定,以及(c)讨论案件对特殊教育工作者的影响来解决最高法院在佩雷斯的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perez v. Sturgis Public School (2017): The Supreme Court Rules on the Special Education Exhaustion Requirement
The U.S. Supreme Court has heard several cases regarding special education. These cases have resulted in decisions that have addressed issues involving special education programming and procedural issues. On March 21, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools. This decision, which was the most recent special education case heard by the highest court in the United States, involved litigation in special education. In this brief article, we address the Supreme Court’s decision in Perez by (a) examining the background of the case, (b) reviewing the decision by the lower courts and the U.S. Supreme Court, and (c) discussing the implications of the case for special educators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intervention in School and Clinic
Intervention in School and Clinic EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Intervention in School and Clinic is practitioner-oriented and designed to provide practical, research-based ideas to educators who work with students with severe learning disabilities and emotional/behavioral problems. Emphasis is placed on strategies and techniques that can be easily implemented in school or clinic settings and address the multifaceted needs of students with severe LD and emotional/behavioral problems. Specifically, articles should target curricular, instructional, social, behavioral, assessment, and vocational strategies and techniques and have direct application to the classroom setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信