在自由、安全和正义领域相互信任和保护基本权利的原则:对法院的一石一石做法的批判

Q2 Social Sciences
Cecilia Rizcallah
{"title":"在自由、安全和正义领域相互信任和保护基本权利的原则:对法院的一石一石做法的批判","authors":"Cecilia Rizcallah","doi":"10.1177/1023263x231205826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of mutual trust has become a structural principle of EU law that underpins many rules of primary law as well as secondary legislation both in the field of internal market and in that of the area, of freedom, security and justice. Several questions in relation to this principle have had to be settled by the Court of Justice, particularly, with regard to the risks that it can pose for the protection of, fundamental rights in the area of freedom, security and justice. In this regard, the Court of Justice adopted a ‘stone-by-stone approach’, by progressively specifying the limits framing the principle of mutual trust on the basis of the specific cases it had to handle. Building on recent the case law, this paper offers a critical, examination of the balance struck by the Court of Justice between the, principle of mutual trust and the protection of fundamental rights.","PeriodicalId":39672,"journal":{"name":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","volume":"22 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The principle of mutual trust and the protection of fundamental rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: A critical look at the Court of Justice's stone-by-stone approach\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Rizcallah\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1023263x231205826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principle of mutual trust has become a structural principle of EU law that underpins many rules of primary law as well as secondary legislation both in the field of internal market and in that of the area, of freedom, security and justice. Several questions in relation to this principle have had to be settled by the Court of Justice, particularly, with regard to the risks that it can pose for the protection of, fundamental rights in the area of freedom, security and justice. In this regard, the Court of Justice adopted a ‘stone-by-stone approach’, by progressively specifying the limits framing the principle of mutual trust on the basis of the specific cases it had to handle. Building on recent the case law, this paper offers a critical, examination of the balance struck by the Court of Justice between the, principle of mutual trust and the protection of fundamental rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"22 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x231205826\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x231205826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

相互信任原则已成为欧盟法律的一项结构性原则,在内部市场和自由、安全和正义领域支撑着许多初级法和次级法的规则。与这一原则有关的几个问题必须由法院解决,特别是关于它可能对保护自由、安全和正义领域的基本权利构成的危险。在这方面,法院采取了一种“循序渐进的方法”,根据它必须处理的具体案件,逐步明确构成相互信任原则的限制。本文以最近的判例法为基础,对法院在相互信任原则和保护基本权利之间取得的平衡进行了批判性的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The principle of mutual trust and the protection of fundamental rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: A critical look at the Court of Justice's stone-by-stone approach
The principle of mutual trust has become a structural principle of EU law that underpins many rules of primary law as well as secondary legislation both in the field of internal market and in that of the area, of freedom, security and justice. Several questions in relation to this principle have had to be settled by the Court of Justice, particularly, with regard to the risks that it can pose for the protection of, fundamental rights in the area of freedom, security and justice. In this regard, the Court of Justice adopted a ‘stone-by-stone approach’, by progressively specifying the limits framing the principle of mutual trust on the basis of the specific cases it had to handle. Building on recent the case law, this paper offers a critical, examination of the balance struck by the Court of Justice between the, principle of mutual trust and the protection of fundamental rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信