在线与自杀意念:个人如何沟通和感知一个点对点中介的社会媒体群体

Q2 Medicine
Jane Brandt Sørensen , Jacob Lauge Thomassen , Flemming Konradsen , Dan W. Meyrowitsch , Thilde Vildekilde , Oscar Milsted Karstad , Thomas Ploug , Natassia Rosewood Kingod
{"title":"在线与自杀意念:个人如何沟通和感知一个点对点中介的社会媒体群体","authors":"Jane Brandt Sørensen ,&nbsp;Jacob Lauge Thomassen ,&nbsp;Flemming Konradsen ,&nbsp;Dan W. Meyrowitsch ,&nbsp;Thilde Vildekilde ,&nbsp;Oscar Milsted Karstad ,&nbsp;Thomas Ploug ,&nbsp;Natassia Rosewood Kingod","doi":"10.1016/j.mhp.2023.200303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Individuals experiencing suicidal ideation increasingly use social media to communicate with peers. The literature shows mixed results of its impact and lack of in-depth explorations of closed social media groups. Aim was to explore how members of a closed peer-to-peer social media group for individuals experiencing suicidal ideation communicate and perceive of their membership.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Access to a closed Facebook group was obtained through administrators and members. Data consisted of descriptive statistics, written content (1 January–30 June 2020), and in-depth interviews with members (<em>n</em> = 5). Data were analyzed using thematic network analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 445 posts and 2891 comments were analysed alongside five interviews. Four thematic areas emerged: (i) Members could share their thoughts with ‘similar others’ in the group; (ii) Many outpoured frustrations in a one-directional manner, while others searched for deep peer discussions; The group was used for (iii) sharing emotional peer-to-peer support; and (iv) practical advice to navigate the psychiatric and social systems.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings highlight the group as a safe space and perceived lack of support from the system. They can assist in better understanding the value and challenges of online peer-to-peer communities; advise on how to navigate them; and pinpoint to support needs of this community.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55864,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Prevention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657023000454/pdfft?md5=851a2f1da5a7a1d1dec70a766ee98c6e&pid=1-s2.0-S2212657023000454-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online with suicidal ideation: How individuals communicate in and perceive a peer-to-peer mediated social media group\",\"authors\":\"Jane Brandt Sørensen ,&nbsp;Jacob Lauge Thomassen ,&nbsp;Flemming Konradsen ,&nbsp;Dan W. Meyrowitsch ,&nbsp;Thilde Vildekilde ,&nbsp;Oscar Milsted Karstad ,&nbsp;Thomas Ploug ,&nbsp;Natassia Rosewood Kingod\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mhp.2023.200303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Individuals experiencing suicidal ideation increasingly use social media to communicate with peers. The literature shows mixed results of its impact and lack of in-depth explorations of closed social media groups. Aim was to explore how members of a closed peer-to-peer social media group for individuals experiencing suicidal ideation communicate and perceive of their membership.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Access to a closed Facebook group was obtained through administrators and members. Data consisted of descriptive statistics, written content (1 January–30 June 2020), and in-depth interviews with members (<em>n</em> = 5). Data were analyzed using thematic network analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 445 posts and 2891 comments were analysed alongside five interviews. Four thematic areas emerged: (i) Members could share their thoughts with ‘similar others’ in the group; (ii) Many outpoured frustrations in a one-directional manner, while others searched for deep peer discussions; The group was used for (iii) sharing emotional peer-to-peer support; and (iv) practical advice to navigate the psychiatric and social systems.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings highlight the group as a safe space and perceived lack of support from the system. They can assist in better understanding the value and challenges of online peer-to-peer communities; advise on how to navigate them; and pinpoint to support needs of this community.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Health and Prevention\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657023000454/pdfft?md5=851a2f1da5a7a1d1dec70a766ee98c6e&pid=1-s2.0-S2212657023000454-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Health and Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657023000454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212657023000454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有自杀意念的个体越来越多地使用社交媒体与同伴交流。文献显示其影响的结果好坏参半,缺乏对封闭社交媒体群体的深入探索。目的是探索一个封闭的点对点社交媒体小组的成员如何沟通和感知他们的成员身份。方法通过管理员和成员进入一个封闭的Facebook群组。数据包括描述性统计、书面内容(2020年1月1日至6月30日)和对成员的深度访谈(n = 5)。数据采用专题网络分析进行分析。结果共分析了445篇帖子和2891条评论,并进行了5次访谈。出现了四个专题领域:(i)成员可以与小组中“类似的其他人”分享他们的想法;许多人以单向方式表达挫折感,而另一些人则寻求深入的同行讨论;该小组用于(iii)分享情感上的点对点支持;(四)在精神病学和社会系统中导航的实用建议。结论:研究结果强调了群体是一个安全的空间,并且缺乏来自系统的支持。它们有助于更好地理解在线点对点社区的价值和挑战;建议如何驾驭它们;并精确地支持这个社区的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online with suicidal ideation: How individuals communicate in and perceive a peer-to-peer mediated social media group

Objective

Individuals experiencing suicidal ideation increasingly use social media to communicate with peers. The literature shows mixed results of its impact and lack of in-depth explorations of closed social media groups. Aim was to explore how members of a closed peer-to-peer social media group for individuals experiencing suicidal ideation communicate and perceive of their membership.

Method

Access to a closed Facebook group was obtained through administrators and members. Data consisted of descriptive statistics, written content (1 January–30 June 2020), and in-depth interviews with members (n = 5). Data were analyzed using thematic network analysis.

Results

A total of 445 posts and 2891 comments were analysed alongside five interviews. Four thematic areas emerged: (i) Members could share their thoughts with ‘similar others’ in the group; (ii) Many outpoured frustrations in a one-directional manner, while others searched for deep peer discussions; The group was used for (iii) sharing emotional peer-to-peer support; and (iv) practical advice to navigate the psychiatric and social systems.

Conclusion

Findings highlight the group as a safe space and perceived lack of support from the system. They can assist in better understanding the value and challenges of online peer-to-peer communities; advise on how to navigate them; and pinpoint to support needs of this community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Health and Prevention
Mental Health and Prevention Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信