小肠手术患者早期与传统术后喂养的比较

Hina Javed, Abdul Gummon, Muhammad Rana, Rafia Shoukat
{"title":"小肠手术患者早期与传统术后喂养的比较","authors":"Hina Javed, Abdul Gummon, Muhammad Rana, Rafia Shoukat","doi":"10.47672/ejhs.1597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The postoperative management of patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery was followed by keeping them ‘nil by mouth' and provide gastric decompression via a nasogastric tube (NGT) until the postoperative ileus resolves and bowel function resumes. Early feeding and recovery are being portrayed as the new solution for these problems. To compare the outcomes in early vs traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing small bowel surgery.&#x0D; Methodology: Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital Lahore. Data collection: The sample size is calculated as 60 (30 in each group), by using WHO sample size calculator by keeping the confidence interval equal to 95%, power equal to 80%, and hospital stay as 4 ± 0.64 days vs. 6.1 ± 0.84 days in early vs late feeding group respectively.&#x0D; Findings: In group A, the mean age of was 33.59±9.34 years and in group B, the mean age of was 34.76±9.87 years. In group A, there were 14 (46.7%) males and 16 (53.3%) females. In group B, there were 14 (46.7%) males and 16 (53.3%) females. In group A, the mean duration of surgery was 59.17±17.28 min. In group B, the mean duration of surgery was 57.17±16.54 min. In group A, there were 4 (13.3%) patients who had postoperative vomiting. In group B, there were 13 (43.3%) patients who had postoperative vomiting (p<0.05). In group A, there were 3 (10%) patients who had postoperative anatomic leak. In group B, there were 5 (16.7%) patients who had postoperative anatomic leak (p>0.05).In group A, the mean time to pass first stool was 4.14±0.90 days. In group B, the mean time to pass first stool was 6.42±1.09 days (p<0.05). In group A, the mean hospital stay was 4.76±0.73 days. In group B, the mean hospital stay was 6.83±1.34 days (p<0.05).&#x0D; Recommendations: The conclusion of the study that early feeding cases are beneficial as compare to conventional (delayed) feeding. It reduces infection complications and length of hospital stay.","PeriodicalId":224837,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early vs Traditional Postoperative Feeding in Patients Undergoing Small Bowel Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Hina Javed, Abdul Gummon, Muhammad Rana, Rafia Shoukat\",\"doi\":\"10.47672/ejhs.1597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The postoperative management of patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery was followed by keeping them ‘nil by mouth' and provide gastric decompression via a nasogastric tube (NGT) until the postoperative ileus resolves and bowel function resumes. Early feeding and recovery are being portrayed as the new solution for these problems. To compare the outcomes in early vs traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing small bowel surgery.&#x0D; Methodology: Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital Lahore. Data collection: The sample size is calculated as 60 (30 in each group), by using WHO sample size calculator by keeping the confidence interval equal to 95%, power equal to 80%, and hospital stay as 4 ± 0.64 days vs. 6.1 ± 0.84 days in early vs late feeding group respectively.&#x0D; Findings: In group A, the mean age of was 33.59±9.34 years and in group B, the mean age of was 34.76±9.87 years. In group A, there were 14 (46.7%) males and 16 (53.3%) females. In group B, there were 14 (46.7%) males and 16 (53.3%) females. In group A, the mean duration of surgery was 59.17±17.28 min. In group B, the mean duration of surgery was 57.17±16.54 min. In group A, there were 4 (13.3%) patients who had postoperative vomiting. In group B, there were 13 (43.3%) patients who had postoperative vomiting (p<0.05). In group A, there were 3 (10%) patients who had postoperative anatomic leak. In group B, there were 5 (16.7%) patients who had postoperative anatomic leak (p>0.05).In group A, the mean time to pass first stool was 4.14±0.90 days. In group B, the mean time to pass first stool was 6.42±1.09 days (p<0.05). In group A, the mean hospital stay was 4.76±0.73 days. In group B, the mean hospital stay was 6.83±1.34 days (p<0.05).&#x0D; Recommendations: The conclusion of the study that early feeding cases are beneficial as compare to conventional (delayed) feeding. It reduces infection complications and length of hospital stay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.1597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.1597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对胃肠(GI)手术患者的术后管理是“口服零氧”,并通过鼻胃管(NGT)进行胃减压,直到术后肠梗阻消退和肠功能恢复。早期喂养和恢复被描绘成解决这些问题的新方法。比较小肠手术患者早期与传统术后喂养的效果。 方法学:研究设计:随机对照试验。单位:拉合尔服务医院普通外科。数据收集:样本量计算为60例(每组30例),采用WHO样本量计算器,置信区间为95%,幂数为80%,住院时间为4±0.64天,早、晚喂养组分别为6.1±0.84天。 结果:A组患者平均年龄为33.59±9.34岁,B组患者平均年龄为34.76±9.87岁。A组男性14例(46.7%),女性16例(53.3%)。B组男性14例(46.7%),女性16例(53.3%)。A组平均手术时间59.17±17.28 min, B组平均手术时间57.17±16.54 min。A组4例(13.3%)患者术后出现呕吐。B组术后出现呕吐13例(43.3%)(p < 0.05)。A组术后解剖渗漏3例(10%)。B组术后解剖渗漏5例(16.7%)(p < 0.05)。A组平均排便时间为4.14±0.90 d。B组平均排便时间为6.42±1.09 d (p < 0.05)。A组患者平均住院时间为4.76±0.73 d。B组平均住院时间为6.83±1.34天(p < 0.05)。 建议:研究的结论是,与常规(延迟)喂养相比,早期喂养是有益的。它减少了感染并发症和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early vs Traditional Postoperative Feeding in Patients Undergoing Small Bowel Surgery
Purpose: The postoperative management of patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) surgery was followed by keeping them ‘nil by mouth' and provide gastric decompression via a nasogastric tube (NGT) until the postoperative ileus resolves and bowel function resumes. Early feeding and recovery are being portrayed as the new solution for these problems. To compare the outcomes in early vs traditional postoperative feeding in patients undergoing small bowel surgery. Methodology: Study design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Department of General Surgery, Services Hospital Lahore. Data collection: The sample size is calculated as 60 (30 in each group), by using WHO sample size calculator by keeping the confidence interval equal to 95%, power equal to 80%, and hospital stay as 4 ± 0.64 days vs. 6.1 ± 0.84 days in early vs late feeding group respectively. Findings: In group A, the mean age of was 33.59±9.34 years and in group B, the mean age of was 34.76±9.87 years. In group A, there were 14 (46.7%) males and 16 (53.3%) females. In group B, there were 14 (46.7%) males and 16 (53.3%) females. In group A, the mean duration of surgery was 59.17±17.28 min. In group B, the mean duration of surgery was 57.17±16.54 min. In group A, there were 4 (13.3%) patients who had postoperative vomiting. In group B, there were 13 (43.3%) patients who had postoperative vomiting (p<0.05). In group A, there were 3 (10%) patients who had postoperative anatomic leak. In group B, there were 5 (16.7%) patients who had postoperative anatomic leak (p>0.05).In group A, the mean time to pass first stool was 4.14±0.90 days. In group B, the mean time to pass first stool was 6.42±1.09 days (p<0.05). In group A, the mean hospital stay was 4.76±0.73 days. In group B, the mean hospital stay was 6.83±1.34 days (p<0.05). Recommendations: The conclusion of the study that early feeding cases are beneficial as compare to conventional (delayed) feeding. It reduces infection complications and length of hospital stay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信