税务方面关于版税成本修正和Secondary Adjustment的税务纠纷(PT XYZ上诉案例研究)

Widhi Nugroho Budi Prasetyo
{"title":"税务方面关于版税成本修正和Secondary Adjustment的税务纠纷(PT XYZ上诉案例研究)","authors":"Widhi Nugroho Budi Prasetyo","doi":"10.33395/owner.v7i4.1697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze transfer pricing disputes over royalty cost correction and the imposition of Secondary Adjustment and provide recommendations both to the tax authorities in the audit process and to taxpayers in the company's financial reporting in the future. Based on the object of research, there are differences in the results of the decision on the dispute over the correction of royalty costs of PT XYZ for the 2009 to 2015 tax years and there has been no research on the imposition of Secondary Adjustment in previous studies. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach by looking at secondary data in the form of PT XYZ Appeal Decisions for tax years 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014 and 2015 as well as interviews with consultants, tax auditors and objection reviewers. The results of the study concluded that the royalty fees charged were not in accordance with the arm’s length principles. The tax auditors is less than optimal in conducting the examination by not imposing Secondary Adjustment for the examination of Tax Years 2013, 2014 and 2015.","PeriodicalId":497834,"journal":{"name":"Owner : riset dan jurnal akuntansi","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sengketa Pajak atas Koreksi Biaya Royalti dan Secondary Adjustment (Studi Kasus Putusan Banding PT XYZ)\",\"authors\":\"Widhi Nugroho Budi Prasetyo\",\"doi\":\"10.33395/owner.v7i4.1697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to analyze transfer pricing disputes over royalty cost correction and the imposition of Secondary Adjustment and provide recommendations both to the tax authorities in the audit process and to taxpayers in the company's financial reporting in the future. Based on the object of research, there are differences in the results of the decision on the dispute over the correction of royalty costs of PT XYZ for the 2009 to 2015 tax years and there has been no research on the imposition of Secondary Adjustment in previous studies. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach by looking at secondary data in the form of PT XYZ Appeal Decisions for tax years 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014 and 2015 as well as interviews with consultants, tax auditors and objection reviewers. The results of the study concluded that the royalty fees charged were not in accordance with the arm’s length principles. The tax auditors is less than optimal in conducting the examination by not imposing Secondary Adjustment for the examination of Tax Years 2013, 2014 and 2015.\",\"PeriodicalId\":497834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Owner : riset dan jurnal akuntansi\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Owner : riset dan jurnal akuntansi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Owner : riset dan jurnal akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是分析特许权使用费成本修正和二次调整征收的转让定价纠纷,并为税务机关在审计过程中以及未来公司财务报告中的纳税人提供建议。基于研究对象,对XYZ PT 2009 - 2015纳税年度特许权使用费修正争议的裁决结果存在差异,且以往研究中未对二次调整的征收进行研究。使用的研究方法是一种定性方法,采用案例研究方法,通过查看2009年、2011年、2013年、2014年和2015年税务年度XYZ上诉决定形式的二手数据,以及对顾问、税务审计员和异议审查员的采访。研究结果表明,收取的版税不符合公平原则。税务审计员在进行审查时没有对2013年、2014年和2015年的税务年度进行二次调整,这不是最理想的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sengketa Pajak atas Koreksi Biaya Royalti dan Secondary Adjustment (Studi Kasus Putusan Banding PT XYZ)
The purpose of this study is to analyze transfer pricing disputes over royalty cost correction and the imposition of Secondary Adjustment and provide recommendations both to the tax authorities in the audit process and to taxpayers in the company's financial reporting in the future. Based on the object of research, there are differences in the results of the decision on the dispute over the correction of royalty costs of PT XYZ for the 2009 to 2015 tax years and there has been no research on the imposition of Secondary Adjustment in previous studies. The research method used is a qualitative method with a case study approach by looking at secondary data in the form of PT XYZ Appeal Decisions for tax years 2009, 2011, 2013, 2014 and 2015 as well as interviews with consultants, tax auditors and objection reviewers. The results of the study concluded that the royalty fees charged were not in accordance with the arm’s length principles. The tax auditors is less than optimal in conducting the examination by not imposing Secondary Adjustment for the examination of Tax Years 2013, 2014 and 2015.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信