Muhammad Taha Qamar, Mariah Muhammad Ashraf, Bakhtawar Zahid, Amina Nawaz, Abraiz Azhar, Darab Fatima Babry
{"title":"下颌第二磨牙邻近阻生第三磨牙放射率的可靠性研究","authors":"Muhammad Taha Qamar, Mariah Muhammad Ashraf, Bakhtawar Zahid, Amina Nawaz, Abraiz Azhar, Darab Fatima Babry","doi":"10.37762/jgmds.10-4.512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES To assess the inter-rater reliability regarding the radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the College of Dentistry, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, in which dentists from four different specialities, namely; Oral Pathology, Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, were included as raters. 21 Orthopantomograms were assigned to each rater for assessing radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. RESULTSThe level of agreement regarding the radiolucencies associated with the second molar observed on the Orthopantomograms between rater 1 with rater 2 (κ=0.158., p=0.036) and rater 1 with rater 3 (κ=0.139, p=1.000) was very weak but was fair between rater1 and 4 (κ=0.271, p=0.200). CONCLUSION The only radiolucency that rater one observed was external root resorption. Rater 2 identified one case of radiolucency as dental caries and another as caries and periapical radiolucency that were identified by Rater 1 as external resorption; hence they had a weak agreement between Rater 1 and Rater 2 regarding the radiolucencies associated with second molars. Rater 3 identified radiolucencies owing to caries which were reported to be radiolucency due to external resorption by rater 1, and this agreement was weak. Most radiolucencies determined by rater 1 as external resorption were reported to be external resorption by rater 4, resulting in a fair agreement between rater 1 and 4.","PeriodicalId":484278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gandhara medical and dental sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inter-Rater Reliability Regarding the Radiolucencies Associated with the Second Molar Adjacent an Impacted Third Mandibular Molar\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Taha Qamar, Mariah Muhammad Ashraf, Bakhtawar Zahid, Amina Nawaz, Abraiz Azhar, Darab Fatima Babry\",\"doi\":\"10.37762/jgmds.10-4.512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES To assess the inter-rater reliability regarding the radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the College of Dentistry, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, in which dentists from four different specialities, namely; Oral Pathology, Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, were included as raters. 21 Orthopantomograms were assigned to each rater for assessing radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. RESULTSThe level of agreement regarding the radiolucencies associated with the second molar observed on the Orthopantomograms between rater 1 with rater 2 (κ=0.158., p=0.036) and rater 1 with rater 3 (κ=0.139, p=1.000) was very weak but was fair between rater1 and 4 (κ=0.271, p=0.200). CONCLUSION The only radiolucency that rater one observed was external root resorption. Rater 2 identified one case of radiolucency as dental caries and another as caries and periapical radiolucency that were identified by Rater 1 as external resorption; hence they had a weak agreement between Rater 1 and Rater 2 regarding the radiolucencies associated with second molars. Rater 3 identified radiolucencies owing to caries which were reported to be radiolucency due to external resorption by rater 1, and this agreement was weak. Most radiolucencies determined by rater 1 as external resorption were reported to be external resorption by rater 4, resulting in a fair agreement between rater 1 and 4.\",\"PeriodicalId\":484278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gandhara medical and dental sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gandhara medical and dental sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-4.512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gandhara medical and dental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.10-4.512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inter-Rater Reliability Regarding the Radiolucencies Associated with the Second Molar Adjacent an Impacted Third Mandibular Molar
OBJECTIVES To assess the inter-rater reliability regarding the radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. METHODOLOGY A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in the College of Dentistry, Sharif Medical and Dental College, Lahore, in which dentists from four different specialities, namely; Oral Pathology, Endodontics, Prosthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, were included as raters. 21 Orthopantomograms were assigned to each rater for assessing radiolucencies associated with a second molar adjacent to an impacted third molar. RESULTSThe level of agreement regarding the radiolucencies associated with the second molar observed on the Orthopantomograms between rater 1 with rater 2 (κ=0.158., p=0.036) and rater 1 with rater 3 (κ=0.139, p=1.000) was very weak but was fair between rater1 and 4 (κ=0.271, p=0.200). CONCLUSION The only radiolucency that rater one observed was external root resorption. Rater 2 identified one case of radiolucency as dental caries and another as caries and periapical radiolucency that were identified by Rater 1 as external resorption; hence they had a weak agreement between Rater 1 and Rater 2 regarding the radiolucencies associated with second molars. Rater 3 identified radiolucencies owing to caries which were reported to be radiolucency due to external resorption by rater 1, and this agreement was weak. Most radiolucencies determined by rater 1 as external resorption were reported to be external resorption by rater 4, resulting in a fair agreement between rater 1 and 4.