遗漏和它的化身

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Philippe Anckaert
{"title":"遗漏和它的化身","authors":"Philippe Anckaert","doi":"10.12797/moap.29.2023.61.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE OMISSION AND ITS AVATARS: TERMINOLOGICAL CHALLENGES AND ISSUES IN DESCRIPTIVE TRANSLATION STUDIESIn this study, Ph. Anckaert gives an overview of the terms proposed over the last thirty years by French-speaking terminologists to designate the various forms of non-translation, which are either errors or procedures. It emerges that there is a high degree of terminological uncertainty surrounding the notion of omission. To overcome this difficulty, which is detrimental to the quality of translation studies, the author proposes to abandon the use of the term omission to designate a translation procedure and to use effacement (deletion) as a hyperonym for implicitation, deletion of heterolingualism and other procedures that remain to be identified or validat éd. This ordering of the terminological apparatus is part of the desire to identify mutually exclusive descriptors, which are indispensable for quantitative analysis conceived as the scientific basis for qualitative analysis.","PeriodicalId":36042,"journal":{"name":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L’omission et ses avatars\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Anckaert\",\"doi\":\"10.12797/moap.29.2023.61.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE OMISSION AND ITS AVATARS: TERMINOLOGICAL CHALLENGES AND ISSUES IN DESCRIPTIVE TRANSLATION STUDIESIn this study, Ph. Anckaert gives an overview of the terms proposed over the last thirty years by French-speaking terminologists to designate the various forms of non-translation, which are either errors or procedures. It emerges that there is a high degree of terminological uncertainty surrounding the notion of omission. To overcome this difficulty, which is detrimental to the quality of translation studies, the author proposes to abandon the use of the term omission to designate a translation procedure and to use effacement (deletion) as a hyperonym for implicitation, deletion of heterolingualism and other procedures that remain to be identified or validat éd. This ordering of the terminological apparatus is part of the desire to identify mutually exclusive descriptors, which are indispensable for quantitative analysis conceived as the scientific basis for qualitative analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.29.2023.61.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.29.2023.61.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

省略及其化身:描述翻译研究中的术语挑战和问题在这项研究中,安卡尔特博士概述了过去三十年来法语术语学家提出的各种形式的非翻译,这些非翻译要么是错误,要么是程序。由此可见,省略的概念在术语上存在着高度的不确定性。为了克服这一不利于翻译研究质量的困难,笔者建议放弃使用“省略”一词来指定翻译程序,而使用“抹去(删除)”作为含意(implicit)、异语(heterolingualism)删除(deletion)等尚待确定或验证的翻译程序的缩略词。术语设备的这种排序是识别互斥描述符的愿望的一部分,这些描述符对于被视为定性分析的科学基础的定量分析是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L’omission et ses avatars
THE OMISSION AND ITS AVATARS: TERMINOLOGICAL CHALLENGES AND ISSUES IN DESCRIPTIVE TRANSLATION STUDIESIn this study, Ph. Anckaert gives an overview of the terms proposed over the last thirty years by French-speaking terminologists to designate the various forms of non-translation, which are either errors or procedures. It emerges that there is a high degree of terminological uncertainty surrounding the notion of omission. To overcome this difficulty, which is detrimental to the quality of translation studies, the author proposes to abandon the use of the term omission to designate a translation procedure and to use effacement (deletion) as a hyperonym for implicitation, deletion of heterolingualism and other procedures that remain to be identified or validat éd. This ordering of the terminological apparatus is part of the desire to identify mutually exclusive descriptors, which are indispensable for quantitative analysis conceived as the scientific basis for qualitative analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem
Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信