{"title":"急诊科急性阑尾炎的误诊:发病率、相关因素和根据患者性格的结果","authors":"Hila Weinberger, Abdel-Rauf Zeina, Itamar Ashkenazi","doi":"10.31486/toj.23.0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3></h3> <b>Background:</b> Although abdominal pain is one of the most common complaints of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), and acute appendicitis is a leading surgical differential diagnosis of patients presenting with abdominal pain, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains challenging. We examined the missed diagnosis rate of acute appendicitis in one ED and evaluated the association between disposition (discharge home or hospitalization in the wrong department) and complicated appendicitis. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients with acute appendicitis and periappendicular abscess from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016. <b>Results:</b> The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was missed in 7.1% of patients (90/1,268) at their first ED encounter: 44 were discharged, and 47 were hospitalized with a wrong diagnosis (1 female patient was both discharged and then hospitalized with an incorrect diagnosis). Compared to the patients who were correctly diagnosed, patients with a missed diagnosis were older (median age 29 years vs 23 years, <i>P</i>=0.022), their time between ED first encounter and surgery was longer (median 29.5 hours vs 9.3 hours, <i>P</i><0.001), and their rate of complicated appendicitis was higher (54.4% vs 27.5%, <i>P</i><0.001). Missed females were more commonly hospitalized (26/39), while missed males were more commonly discharged from the ED (31/52) (<i>P</i>=0.019). No differences in the time between the first ED encounter and surgery (29.6 hours vs 29.6 hours, <i>P</i>=0.29) and the rate of complicated appendicitis (63.8% vs 43.2%, <i>P</i>=0.06) were noted between hospitalized patients with a wrong diagnosis and those discharged from the ED. Of the 25 patients with periappendicular abscesses, only 3 could be related to missed diagnoses during their first encounter in the ED. <b>Conclusion:</b> We found that 7.1% of patients were missed during their first encounter in the ED. Hospitalization in departments other than general surgery was not protective against delay in surgery or the development of complicated appendicitis. Periappendicular abscess was attributable to late referral rather than a missed diagnosis in most patients<b>.</b>","PeriodicalId":47600,"journal":{"name":"Ochsner Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misdiagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Outcomes According to the Patients' Disposition\",\"authors\":\"Hila Weinberger, Abdel-Rauf Zeina, Itamar Ashkenazi\",\"doi\":\"10.31486/toj.23.0051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3></h3> <b>Background:</b> Although abdominal pain is one of the most common complaints of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), and acute appendicitis is a leading surgical differential diagnosis of patients presenting with abdominal pain, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains challenging. We examined the missed diagnosis rate of acute appendicitis in one ED and evaluated the association between disposition (discharge home or hospitalization in the wrong department) and complicated appendicitis. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients with acute appendicitis and periappendicular abscess from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016. <b>Results:</b> The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was missed in 7.1% of patients (90/1,268) at their first ED encounter: 44 were discharged, and 47 were hospitalized with a wrong diagnosis (1 female patient was both discharged and then hospitalized with an incorrect diagnosis). Compared to the patients who were correctly diagnosed, patients with a missed diagnosis were older (median age 29 years vs 23 years, <i>P</i>=0.022), their time between ED first encounter and surgery was longer (median 29.5 hours vs 9.3 hours, <i>P</i><0.001), and their rate of complicated appendicitis was higher (54.4% vs 27.5%, <i>P</i><0.001). Missed females were more commonly hospitalized (26/39), while missed males were more commonly discharged from the ED (31/52) (<i>P</i>=0.019). No differences in the time between the first ED encounter and surgery (29.6 hours vs 29.6 hours, <i>P</i>=0.29) and the rate of complicated appendicitis (63.8% vs 43.2%, <i>P</i>=0.06) were noted between hospitalized patients with a wrong diagnosis and those discharged from the ED. Of the 25 patients with periappendicular abscesses, only 3 could be related to missed diagnoses during their first encounter in the ED. <b>Conclusion:</b> We found that 7.1% of patients were missed during their first encounter in the ED. Hospitalization in departments other than general surgery was not protective against delay in surgery or the development of complicated appendicitis. Periappendicular abscess was attributable to late referral rather than a missed diagnosis in most patients<b>.</b>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ochsner Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ochsner Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.23.0051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ochsner Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.23.0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然腹痛是急诊科(ED)患者最常见的主诉之一,急性阑尾炎是腹痛患者的主要外科鉴别诊断,但急性阑尾炎的诊断仍然具有挑战性。我们检查了一个急诊科的急性阑尾炎的漏诊率,并评估了处置(出院回家或在错误的科室住院)与复杂性阑尾炎的关系。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月1日至2016年12月31日急性阑尾炎伴阑尾周围脓肿患者的病历。结果:7.1%(90/ 1268)患者首次就诊时漏诊急性阑尾炎,其中44例出院,47例误诊住院(1例女性患者出院后又误诊住院)。与正确诊断的患者相比,漏诊患者年龄较大(中位年龄29岁对23岁,P=0.022), ED首次就诊到手术的时间较长(中位29.5小时对9.3小时,P= 0.001),并发阑尾炎的发生率较高(54.4%对27.5%,P= 0.001)。漏诊女性住院率(26/39)高于漏诊男性出院率(31/52)(P=0.019)。误诊住院患者与出院患者首次就诊与手术时间(29.6 h vs 29.6 h, P=0.29)、并发症阑尾炎发生率(63.8% vs 43.2%, P=0.06)差异无统计学意义。在25例阑尾周围脓肿患者中,仅有3例与首次就诊时漏诊有关。我们发现,7.1%的患者在第一次就诊时就错过了急诊科。在普通外科以外的科室住院并不能预防手术延误或并发阑尾炎。阑尾周围脓肿可归因于晚期转诊,而不是大多数患者的漏诊。
Misdiagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in the Emergency Department: Prevalence, Associated Factors, and Outcomes According to the Patients' Disposition
Background: Although abdominal pain is one of the most common complaints of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED), and acute appendicitis is a leading surgical differential diagnosis of patients presenting with abdominal pain, the diagnosis of acute appendicitis remains challenging. We examined the missed diagnosis rate of acute appendicitis in one ED and evaluated the association between disposition (discharge home or hospitalization in the wrong department) and complicated appendicitis. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients with acute appendicitis and periappendicular abscess from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2016. Results: The diagnosis of acute appendicitis was missed in 7.1% of patients (90/1,268) at their first ED encounter: 44 were discharged, and 47 were hospitalized with a wrong diagnosis (1 female patient was both discharged and then hospitalized with an incorrect diagnosis). Compared to the patients who were correctly diagnosed, patients with a missed diagnosis were older (median age 29 years vs 23 years, P=0.022), their time between ED first encounter and surgery was longer (median 29.5 hours vs 9.3 hours, P<0.001), and their rate of complicated appendicitis was higher (54.4% vs 27.5%, P<0.001). Missed females were more commonly hospitalized (26/39), while missed males were more commonly discharged from the ED (31/52) (P=0.019). No differences in the time between the first ED encounter and surgery (29.6 hours vs 29.6 hours, P=0.29) and the rate of complicated appendicitis (63.8% vs 43.2%, P=0.06) were noted between hospitalized patients with a wrong diagnosis and those discharged from the ED. Of the 25 patients with periappendicular abscesses, only 3 could be related to missed diagnoses during their first encounter in the ED. Conclusion: We found that 7.1% of patients were missed during their first encounter in the ED. Hospitalization in departments other than general surgery was not protective against delay in surgery or the development of complicated appendicitis. Periappendicular abscess was attributable to late referral rather than a missed diagnosis in most patients.
期刊介绍:
The Ochsner Journal is a quarterly publication designed to support Ochsner"s mission to improve the health of our community through a commitment to innovation in healthcare, medical research, and education. The Ochsner Journal provides an active dialogue on practice standards in today"s changing healthcare environment. Emphasis will be given to topics of great societal and medical significance.