{"title":"共享单车的使用是对公共交通的补充还是重叠?比利时布鲁塞尔的案例","authors":"Frédéric Dobruszkes, Michał Dzięcielski","doi":"10.1080/03081060.2023.2256717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper complements the existing literature on Bike Share Schemes (BSS) by investigating their use from a spatiotemporal perspective to assess their relationship with public transport (PT). We address these questions through the case of Brussels and its long-standing docked BSS ‘Villo!’. Our study analyses comprehensive (consecutive 12 months) and disaggregated (station level) data on rentals and returns and finds that Villo! is used mostly in dense (although not all) districts also well served by PT. However, temporal structures suggest Villo! overtakes PT at night in vibrant districts and possibly in selected districts with lower PT services over weekends. In addition, Villo! stations at key PT hubs usually do not show specific temporal patterns, which suggests intermodality may work at all times during PT operations. There could be an evening peak effect combined with the Brussels’ topography, but this needs to be confirmed by on-site surveys.KEYWORDS: Bike-sharingpublic transportspatiotemporal analysisprincipal component analysis AcknowledgmentMichał Dzięcielski gratefully acknowledge the computational grant from the Supercomputing and Networking Center (PSNC) in Poznań, Poland.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In Brussels, the ‘premetro’ is an underground-like infrastructure operated by tramways that ride both underground and in the streets.2 JCDecaux API, https://developer.jcdecaux.com/#/home (Accessed 22.04.2023).3 The monthly patterns of Villo! ridership could not be investigated because the period of the investigation was disturbed by post-pandemic recovery and thus increasing usage over time.4 Mathematically speaking, for each PC the statistical package computes the linear correlation between the supplementary variable and the scores.5 We argue that the value of a bike is proportionally higher for a poorer household than for a privileged one.6 This amount is not debited but must be available for the case rules would not be respected.","PeriodicalId":23345,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Planning and Technology","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does docked bike-sharing usage complement or overlap public transport? the case of Brussels, Belgium\",\"authors\":\"Frédéric Dobruszkes, Michał Dzięcielski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03081060.2023.2256717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis paper complements the existing literature on Bike Share Schemes (BSS) by investigating their use from a spatiotemporal perspective to assess their relationship with public transport (PT). We address these questions through the case of Brussels and its long-standing docked BSS ‘Villo!’. Our study analyses comprehensive (consecutive 12 months) and disaggregated (station level) data on rentals and returns and finds that Villo! is used mostly in dense (although not all) districts also well served by PT. However, temporal structures suggest Villo! overtakes PT at night in vibrant districts and possibly in selected districts with lower PT services over weekends. In addition, Villo! stations at key PT hubs usually do not show specific temporal patterns, which suggests intermodality may work at all times during PT operations. There could be an evening peak effect combined with the Brussels’ topography, but this needs to be confirmed by on-site surveys.KEYWORDS: Bike-sharingpublic transportspatiotemporal analysisprincipal component analysis AcknowledgmentMichał Dzięcielski gratefully acknowledge the computational grant from the Supercomputing and Networking Center (PSNC) in Poznań, Poland.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In Brussels, the ‘premetro’ is an underground-like infrastructure operated by tramways that ride both underground and in the streets.2 JCDecaux API, https://developer.jcdecaux.com/#/home (Accessed 22.04.2023).3 The monthly patterns of Villo! ridership could not be investigated because the period of the investigation was disturbed by post-pandemic recovery and thus increasing usage over time.4 Mathematically speaking, for each PC the statistical package computes the linear correlation between the supplementary variable and the scores.5 We argue that the value of a bike is proportionally higher for a poorer household than for a privileged one.6 This amount is not debited but must be available for the case rules would not be respected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Planning and Technology\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Planning and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2023.2256717\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Planning and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2023.2256717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does docked bike-sharing usage complement or overlap public transport? the case of Brussels, Belgium
ABSTRACTThis paper complements the existing literature on Bike Share Schemes (BSS) by investigating their use from a spatiotemporal perspective to assess their relationship with public transport (PT). We address these questions through the case of Brussels and its long-standing docked BSS ‘Villo!’. Our study analyses comprehensive (consecutive 12 months) and disaggregated (station level) data on rentals and returns and finds that Villo! is used mostly in dense (although not all) districts also well served by PT. However, temporal structures suggest Villo! overtakes PT at night in vibrant districts and possibly in selected districts with lower PT services over weekends. In addition, Villo! stations at key PT hubs usually do not show specific temporal patterns, which suggests intermodality may work at all times during PT operations. There could be an evening peak effect combined with the Brussels’ topography, but this needs to be confirmed by on-site surveys.KEYWORDS: Bike-sharingpublic transportspatiotemporal analysisprincipal component analysis AcknowledgmentMichał Dzięcielski gratefully acknowledge the computational grant from the Supercomputing and Networking Center (PSNC) in Poznań, Poland.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In Brussels, the ‘premetro’ is an underground-like infrastructure operated by tramways that ride both underground and in the streets.2 JCDecaux API, https://developer.jcdecaux.com/#/home (Accessed 22.04.2023).3 The monthly patterns of Villo! ridership could not be investigated because the period of the investigation was disturbed by post-pandemic recovery and thus increasing usage over time.4 Mathematically speaking, for each PC the statistical package computes the linear correlation between the supplementary variable and the scores.5 We argue that the value of a bike is proportionally higher for a poorer household than for a privileged one.6 This amount is not debited but must be available for the case rules would not be respected.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Planning and Technology places considerable emphasis on the interface between transportation planning and technology, economics, land use planning and policy.
The Editor welcomes submissions covering, but not limited to, topics such as:
• transport demand
• land use forecasting
• economic evaluation and its relationship to policy in both developed and developing countries
• conventional and possibly unconventional future systems technology
• urban and interurban transport terminals and interchanges
• environmental aspects associated with transport (particularly those relating to climate change resilience and adaptation).
The journal also welcomes technical papers of a more narrow focus as well as in-depth state-of-the-art papers. State-of-the-art papers should address transport topics that have a strong empirical base and contain explanatory research results that fit well with the core aims and scope of the journal.