东亚和东南亚的移民治理

IF 1.7 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1093/irap/lcad010

Erin Chung, James F Hollifield, Yunchen Tian

{"title":"东亚和东南亚的移民治理","authors":"Erin Chung, James F Hollifield, Yunchen Tian","doi":"10.1093/irap/lcad010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explains migration governance in East and Southeast Asia by comparing guestworker programs that have institutionalized labor migration flows between Southeast Asian countries (especially Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam) and the two largest Northeast Asian recipients of labor migration, Japan and South Korea. It demonstrates how these programs have led to heightened competition for skilled labor between countries of destination, while facilitating greater migration flows between countries in Southeast and Northeast Asia. Bilateral economic agreements have engendered highly uneven, underdeveloped frameworks for protecting migrant rights and facilitating migrant integration in countries of destination. The analysis also provides insights into theories of complex interdependence and global migration governance, and shows how migration interdependence (MI) can lead to both cooperation and conflict.","PeriodicalId":51799,"journal":{"name":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Migration governance in East and Southeast Asia\",\"authors\":\"Erin Chung, James F Hollifield, Yunchen Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/irap/lcad010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article explains migration governance in East and Southeast Asia by comparing guestworker programs that have institutionalized labor migration flows between Southeast Asian countries (especially Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam) and the two largest Northeast Asian recipients of labor migration, Japan and South Korea. It demonstrates how these programs have led to heightened competition for skilled labor between countries of destination, while facilitating greater migration flows between countries in Southeast and Northeast Asia. Bilateral economic agreements have engendered highly uneven, underdeveloped frameworks for protecting migrant rights and facilitating migrant integration in countries of destination. The analysis also provides insights into theories of complex interdependence and global migration governance, and shows how migration interdependence (MI) can lead to both cooperation and conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcad010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Relations of the Asia-Pacific","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcad010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过比较将东南亚国家(尤其是印度尼西亚、菲律宾和越南)与两个最大的东北亚劳务移民接收国日本和韩国之间的劳务移民流动制度化的客工项目，来解释东亚和东南亚的移民治理。报告展示了这些项目如何导致目的地国之间对熟练劳动力的竞争加剧，同时促进了东南亚和东北亚国家之间更大的移民流动。双边经济协定造成了保护移徙者权利和促进移徙者融入目的地国的极不平衡和不发达的框架。该分析还提供了对复杂相互依赖和全球迁移治理理论的见解，并展示了迁移相互依赖(MI)如何导致合作和冲突。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Migration governance in East and Southeast Asia

Abstract This article explains migration governance in East and Southeast Asia by comparing guestworker programs that have institutionalized labor migration flows between Southeast Asian countries (especially Indonesia, the Philippines, and Vietnam) and the two largest Northeast Asian recipients of labor migration, Japan and South Korea. It demonstrates how these programs have led to heightened competition for skilled labor between countries of destination, while facilitating greater migration flows between countries in Southeast and Northeast Asia. Bilateral economic agreements have engendered highly uneven, underdeveloped frameworks for protecting migrant rights and facilitating migrant integration in countries of destination. The analysis also provides insights into theories of complex interdependence and global migration governance, and shows how migration interdependence (MI) can lead to both cooperation and conflict.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Relations of the Asia-Pacific INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

2.70

自引率

7.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Relations of the Asia-Pacific is an exciting journal that addresses the major issues and developments taking place in the Asia-Pacific. It provides frontier knowledge of and fresh insights into the Asia-Pacific. The journal is a meeting place where various issues are debated from refreshingly diverging angles, backed up by rigorous scholarship. The journal is open to all methodological approaches and schools of thought, and to ideas that are expressed in plain and clear language.