减少废物外流,促进节约用水

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Sarah Halabieh, L.H. Shu
{"title":"减少废物外流,促进节约用水","authors":"Sarah Halabieh, L.H. Shu","doi":"10.1115/1.4064042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A novel intervention to increase water-conserving behavior was developed and tested. Behavior-change interventions range from information-based, where individuals have full control over whether they act on the provided information, to forcing/automation, where individuals have no control over the desired behavior. This study's intervention was devised to be more forceful than providing information alone, but unlike forcing/automation, still allows individuals to control whether they perform the desired behavior. While resource-conservation strategies tend to target resource intake, the studied intervention examines whether limiting resource outflow can in turn limit resource intake. Specific to water, this study explored whether reducing waste-water outflow, causing accumulation, can in turn reduce water inflow. Data was collected online using a simulation of handwashing at a sink, which had different sink-outflow rates. Amazon Mechanical Turk workers completed three randomly ordered handwashing simulations. Study participants (n=74) significantly reduced simulated consumption of water when it accumulated quickly in the sink (p<0.001). Participants reduced simulated water consumption, on average by 14% at lower outflow rates, as they decreased inflow rates to prevent sink overflow. In contrast to informational interventions that rely on user motivation, reducing outflow significantly decreased simulated water usage, independent of participant-reported performance of other pro-environmental behaviors. Thus, reducing outflow may be effective regardless of individuals' motivation to act sustainably. Finally discussed is the value of online simulations to test pro-environmental behavior interventions. Potential directions for in-person testing are outlined as future work.","PeriodicalId":50137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mechanical Design","volume":"100 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Waste Outflow to Motivate Water Conservation\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Halabieh, L.H. Shu\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4064042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A novel intervention to increase water-conserving behavior was developed and tested. Behavior-change interventions range from information-based, where individuals have full control over whether they act on the provided information, to forcing/automation, where individuals have no control over the desired behavior. This study's intervention was devised to be more forceful than providing information alone, but unlike forcing/automation, still allows individuals to control whether they perform the desired behavior. While resource-conservation strategies tend to target resource intake, the studied intervention examines whether limiting resource outflow can in turn limit resource intake. Specific to water, this study explored whether reducing waste-water outflow, causing accumulation, can in turn reduce water inflow. Data was collected online using a simulation of handwashing at a sink, which had different sink-outflow rates. Amazon Mechanical Turk workers completed three randomly ordered handwashing simulations. Study participants (n=74) significantly reduced simulated consumption of water when it accumulated quickly in the sink (p<0.001). Participants reduced simulated water consumption, on average by 14% at lower outflow rates, as they decreased inflow rates to prevent sink overflow. In contrast to informational interventions that rely on user motivation, reducing outflow significantly decreased simulated water usage, independent of participant-reported performance of other pro-environmental behaviors. Thus, reducing outflow may be effective regardless of individuals' motivation to act sustainably. Finally discussed is the value of online simulations to test pro-environmental behavior interventions. Potential directions for in-person testing are outlined as future work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"volume\":\"100 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mechanical Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064042\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mechanical Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文提出并试验了一种新的节水干预措施。行为改变干预的范围从基于信息的,个人可以完全控制他们是否根据提供的信息采取行动,到强迫/自动化,个人无法控制期望的行为。这项研究的干预被设计成比单独提供信息更有力,但与强迫/自动化不同,它仍然允许个人控制他们是否执行期望的行为。虽然资源保护策略倾向于以资源摄入为目标,但研究的干预措施考察了限制资源流出是否能反过来限制资源摄入。具体到水,本研究探讨了减少废水流出引起的积累是否可以反过来减少水流入。数据是通过模拟在水槽洗手来在线收集的,这些水槽有不同的流出率。亚马逊土耳其机器人的工作人员完成了三次随机排序的洗手模拟。当水在水槽中迅速积累时,研究参与者(n=74)显著减少了模拟水的消耗(p<0.001)。参与者减少了模拟用水量,在较低的流出率下,平均减少了14%,因为他们减少了流入率,以防止水槽溢出。与依赖于用户动机的信息干预相比,减少流出显著降低了模拟用水量,这与参与者报告的其他亲环境行为的表现无关。因此,减少资本外流可能是有效的,而不考虑个人的可持续行动动机。最后讨论了在线模拟测试亲环境行为干预的价值。在未来的工作中,概述了现场测试的潜在方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Waste Outflow to Motivate Water Conservation
Abstract A novel intervention to increase water-conserving behavior was developed and tested. Behavior-change interventions range from information-based, where individuals have full control over whether they act on the provided information, to forcing/automation, where individuals have no control over the desired behavior. This study's intervention was devised to be more forceful than providing information alone, but unlike forcing/automation, still allows individuals to control whether they perform the desired behavior. While resource-conservation strategies tend to target resource intake, the studied intervention examines whether limiting resource outflow can in turn limit resource intake. Specific to water, this study explored whether reducing waste-water outflow, causing accumulation, can in turn reduce water inflow. Data was collected online using a simulation of handwashing at a sink, which had different sink-outflow rates. Amazon Mechanical Turk workers completed three randomly ordered handwashing simulations. Study participants (n=74) significantly reduced simulated consumption of water when it accumulated quickly in the sink (p&lt;0.001). Participants reduced simulated water consumption, on average by 14% at lower outflow rates, as they decreased inflow rates to prevent sink overflow. In contrast to informational interventions that rely on user motivation, reducing outflow significantly decreased simulated water usage, independent of participant-reported performance of other pro-environmental behaviors. Thus, reducing outflow may be effective regardless of individuals' motivation to act sustainably. Finally discussed is the value of online simulations to test pro-environmental behavior interventions. Potential directions for in-person testing are outlined as future work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mechanical Design
Journal of Mechanical Design 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials. Scope: The Journal of Mechanical Design (JMD) serves the broad design community as the venue for scholarly, archival research in all aspects of the design activity with emphasis on design synthesis. JMD has traditionally served the ASME Design Engineering Division and its technical committees, but it welcomes contributions from all areas of design with emphasis on synthesis. JMD communicates original contributions, primarily in the form of research articles of considerable depth, but also technical briefs, design innovation papers, book reviews, and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信