{"title":"迈向合作的联邦:德州农民-劳工激进主义的移栽根源","authors":"Jarod Roll","doi":"10.1215/15476715-10581377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thomas Alter II uses a multigenerational biography to recover a long history of agrarian challenges to capitalism in Texas and beyond that makes bold arguments about the genealogy of working-class radicalism in the United States and offers critical lessons for the American left today. Alter sheds new light on familiar subjects in the history of US agrarian radicalism—the Farmers Alliance, People's Party, and Socialist Party of America—by situating them in the transnational context of revolution: Germany in 1848, Mexico in 1910, and Russia in 1917. Focusing on three generations of the German American Meitzen family, who first arrived in Texas from Silesia in 1849 and became leading radical activists, Alter “demonstrates the existence of a decades-long farmer-labor bloc” that ran from the Greenback Party in the 1870s to the Farm-Labor Union of America in the 1920s (2). This farmer-labor bloc, he argues, “moved the political spectrum of US political culture both substantively and ideologically to the left” (2). While Alter sees the reforms of the Progressive Era and the New Deal as weak derivatives of farmer-labor bloc demands, he argues that these measures would not have happened without the agrarian radicalism kept alive by activists like the Meitzens. The farmer-labor bloc they helped build was at its most influential, he contends, when organized for independent political action, not when working within the partisan mainstream. Here Alter sees a clear lesson for the US left today: “Working-class protest movements have more success achieving their demands when they politically organize themselves as a partisan party independent of the two-party system” (3).Alter's through line is a biographical study of three generations of the Meitzen family whose members played leading roles in the development of the farmer-labor bloc, particularly in Texas. He follows their story, with its long pattern of involvement in radical politics, back to Silesia in the early nineteenth century. Here Alter finds the “roots” of the idea for a political movement to serve the needs of farmers and laborers that would later animate the Populist and Socialist movements, and the German immigrants, including the Meitzens among many others, who would actively transplant that idea after violent suppression of the 1848 German revolution forced their immigration to the United States. Arriving in Texas, the Meitzens helped lead a succession of working-class organizations—cooperatives, unions, and political parties among them—that sought to build a political coalition of farmers and wage workers to challenge the growing power of industrial capitalism. Alter uses their multigenerational activism to demonstrate the continuous development of the farmer-labor bloc through myriad linked and generally successive groups, including the Texas People's Party (1873), Greenback Party, Greenback-Labor Party, Grange, Farmers Alliance, People's Party, Farmers’ Union, Socialist Party, Nonpartisan League, American Party, Workers Party, Texas Labor Party, Farmer Labor Party, and more. In each case, Alter analyzes the movement through the lens of the Meitzens, whose long lives of committed action open up a wide-ranging intellectual and political history of American radicalism.Alter's transnational analysis not only extends his argument chronologically but also deepens it, particularly regarding Mexican influence on the American farmer-labor bloc. He shows how the influence of the Mexican Revolution in the 1910s helped push Texas Socialists toward a more radical land policy that emphasized the plight of tenant farmers, which in turn forced them to confront their previous comfort with white supremacist politics. By 1915, Texas Socialists were at the vanguard of the party's left that advanced a radical critique of capitalism and robust opposition to US military intervention in Mexico and Europe. The example of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution only accelerated that political trajectory. These transnational sources, Alter argues, made Texas farmer-labor radicals a “serious threat to the capitalist nation-state” (171).Alter's expansive approach makes Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth a significant addition to the literature on agrarian radicalism in the United States. While many readers will recognize parts of his story from the work of James Green, Mark Lause, Lawrence Goodwyn, and Kyle Wilkison, among others, Alter persuasively demonstrates that the farmer-labor bloc was a coherent, decades-long political lineage that subsumed movements that scholars generally treat as discrete, such as Populism and Socialism. He also shows that the farmer-labor bloc pursued a forward-looking radical alternative to industrial capitalism during its existence, thus offering a powerful counterargument to scholars who portray agrarian politics either as hopelessly backward or as an agribusiness seedbed. Importantly, Alter demonstrates the reach of the farmer-labor bloc well into the 1920s, a relatively understudied period of farmer and labor organizing, through the Nonpartisan League, Robert La Follette's 1924 presidential campaign, and the support from aging agrarian radicals that helped make Franklin D. Roosevelt the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party. Like all scholars of agrarian radicalism, Alter urges historians of urban, industrial working-class movements to take “these country bumpkins” seriously because without them, he asserts, “we might never have left the Gilded Age” (11).While Alter concludes that the Meitzens themselves do not make a great model for contemporary activists on the left because of their frequent willingness to tolerate the dictates of white supremacy, he does identify strategic political lessons from the farmer-labor bloc. The bloc was most successful, he concludes, when it organized independent political action in opposition to the two mainstream parties. Rather than work within the contemporary Democratic Party, Alter argues, working-class activists today should follow the example of the farmer-labor bloc's successes by creating a new political coalition “dedicated to radical economic reform and functioning outside the two-party system” (217).Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth is both provocative and compelling. Alter's crisply written and well-researched account is necessary reading for scholars of labor and left politics, as well as for activists and organizers who seek a better future for working people.","PeriodicalId":43329,"journal":{"name":"Labor-Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth: The Transplanted Roots of Farmer-Labor Radicalism in Texas\",\"authors\":\"Jarod Roll\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/15476715-10581377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Thomas Alter II uses a multigenerational biography to recover a long history of agrarian challenges to capitalism in Texas and beyond that makes bold arguments about the genealogy of working-class radicalism in the United States and offers critical lessons for the American left today. Alter sheds new light on familiar subjects in the history of US agrarian radicalism—the Farmers Alliance, People's Party, and Socialist Party of America—by situating them in the transnational context of revolution: Germany in 1848, Mexico in 1910, and Russia in 1917. Focusing on three generations of the German American Meitzen family, who first arrived in Texas from Silesia in 1849 and became leading radical activists, Alter “demonstrates the existence of a decades-long farmer-labor bloc” that ran from the Greenback Party in the 1870s to the Farm-Labor Union of America in the 1920s (2). This farmer-labor bloc, he argues, “moved the political spectrum of US political culture both substantively and ideologically to the left” (2). While Alter sees the reforms of the Progressive Era and the New Deal as weak derivatives of farmer-labor bloc demands, he argues that these measures would not have happened without the agrarian radicalism kept alive by activists like the Meitzens. The farmer-labor bloc they helped build was at its most influential, he contends, when organized for independent political action, not when working within the partisan mainstream. Here Alter sees a clear lesson for the US left today: “Working-class protest movements have more success achieving their demands when they politically organize themselves as a partisan party independent of the two-party system” (3).Alter's through line is a biographical study of three generations of the Meitzen family whose members played leading roles in the development of the farmer-labor bloc, particularly in Texas. He follows their story, with its long pattern of involvement in radical politics, back to Silesia in the early nineteenth century. Here Alter finds the “roots” of the idea for a political movement to serve the needs of farmers and laborers that would later animate the Populist and Socialist movements, and the German immigrants, including the Meitzens among many others, who would actively transplant that idea after violent suppression of the 1848 German revolution forced their immigration to the United States. Arriving in Texas, the Meitzens helped lead a succession of working-class organizations—cooperatives, unions, and political parties among them—that sought to build a political coalition of farmers and wage workers to challenge the growing power of industrial capitalism. Alter uses their multigenerational activism to demonstrate the continuous development of the farmer-labor bloc through myriad linked and generally successive groups, including the Texas People's Party (1873), Greenback Party, Greenback-Labor Party, Grange, Farmers Alliance, People's Party, Farmers’ Union, Socialist Party, Nonpartisan League, American Party, Workers Party, Texas Labor Party, Farmer Labor Party, and more. In each case, Alter analyzes the movement through the lens of the Meitzens, whose long lives of committed action open up a wide-ranging intellectual and political history of American radicalism.Alter's transnational analysis not only extends his argument chronologically but also deepens it, particularly regarding Mexican influence on the American farmer-labor bloc. He shows how the influence of the Mexican Revolution in the 1910s helped push Texas Socialists toward a more radical land policy that emphasized the plight of tenant farmers, which in turn forced them to confront their previous comfort with white supremacist politics. By 1915, Texas Socialists were at the vanguard of the party's left that advanced a radical critique of capitalism and robust opposition to US military intervention in Mexico and Europe. The example of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution only accelerated that political trajectory. These transnational sources, Alter argues, made Texas farmer-labor radicals a “serious threat to the capitalist nation-state” (171).Alter's expansive approach makes Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth a significant addition to the literature on agrarian radicalism in the United States. While many readers will recognize parts of his story from the work of James Green, Mark Lause, Lawrence Goodwyn, and Kyle Wilkison, among others, Alter persuasively demonstrates that the farmer-labor bloc was a coherent, decades-long political lineage that subsumed movements that scholars generally treat as discrete, such as Populism and Socialism. He also shows that the farmer-labor bloc pursued a forward-looking radical alternative to industrial capitalism during its existence, thus offering a powerful counterargument to scholars who portray agrarian politics either as hopelessly backward or as an agribusiness seedbed. Importantly, Alter demonstrates the reach of the farmer-labor bloc well into the 1920s, a relatively understudied period of farmer and labor organizing, through the Nonpartisan League, Robert La Follette's 1924 presidential campaign, and the support from aging agrarian radicals that helped make Franklin D. Roosevelt the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party. Like all scholars of agrarian radicalism, Alter urges historians of urban, industrial working-class movements to take “these country bumpkins” seriously because without them, he asserts, “we might never have left the Gilded Age” (11).While Alter concludes that the Meitzens themselves do not make a great model for contemporary activists on the left because of their frequent willingness to tolerate the dictates of white supremacy, he does identify strategic political lessons from the farmer-labor bloc. The bloc was most successful, he concludes, when it organized independent political action in opposition to the two mainstream parties. Rather than work within the contemporary Democratic Party, Alter argues, working-class activists today should follow the example of the farmer-labor bloc's successes by creating a new political coalition “dedicated to radical economic reform and functioning outside the two-party system” (217).Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth is both provocative and compelling. Alter's crisply written and well-researched account is necessary reading for scholars of labor and left politics, as well as for activists and organizers who seek a better future for working people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor-Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor-Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-10581377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor-Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-10581377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
托马斯·奥尔特二世通过多代人的传记,重现了德克萨斯州及其他地区农业对资本主义的挑战的悠久历史,对美国工人阶级激进主义的谱系提出了大胆的论点,并为今天的美国左派提供了重要的教训。奥尔特将美国农业激进主义历史上熟悉的主题——农民联盟、人民党和美国社会党——置于革命的跨国背景下:1848年的德国、1910年的墨西哥和1917年的俄罗斯,从而对它们进行了新的阐释。1849年,德裔美国人麦岑(Meitzen)家族第一次从西里西亚(Silesia)来到德克萨斯州,并成为了激进激进分子的领袖。奥尔特着重研究了他们的三代人。他“证明了一个长达数十年的农工集团的存在”,从19世纪70年代的绿绿党(绿绿党)到20世纪20年代的美国农工联盟(Farm-Labor Union of America)(2)。“使美国政治文化的政治光谱在实质上和意识形态上都向左移动”(2)。虽然Alter认为进步时代的改革和新政是农民-劳工集团要求的弱衍生品,但他认为,如果没有像Meitzens这样的活动家保持活跃的土地激进主义,这些措施就不会发生。他认为,他们帮助建立的农工集团在为独立的政治行动而组织起来的时候最有影响力,而不是在党派主流中工作的时候。在这里,Alter为今天的美国左派看到了一个清晰的教训:“当工人阶级的抗议运动在政治上组织成一个独立于两党制的党派时,他们会更成功地实现自己的要求”(3)。Alter的贯穿线是对Meitzen家族三代人的传记研究,他们的成员在农民-劳工集团的发展中发挥了主导作用,特别是在德克萨斯州。他跟随他们的故事,以及他们长期参与激进政治的模式,追溯至19世纪早期的西里西亚。在这里,Alter找到了为农民和工人的需要服务的政治运动理念的“根源”,这一理念后来激发了民粹主义和社会主义运动,以及德国移民,包括meitzen夫妇在内的许多人,在1848年德国革命遭到暴力镇压后,他们被迫移民到美国,积极地移植了这一理念。到达德克萨斯州后,梅岑夫妇帮助领导了一系列工人阶级组织——合作社、工会和政党——试图建立一个农民和雇佣工人的政治联盟,以挑战日益强大的工业资本主义。Alter用他们几代人的行动主义来展示农民-劳工集团的持续发展,通过无数相互联系和通常连续的团体,包括德克萨斯人民党(1873)、绿背党、绿背工党、格兰奇、农民联盟、人民党、农民联盟、社会党、无党派联盟、美国党、工人党、德克萨斯工党、农民工党等等。在每一个案例中,阿尔特都通过梅岑夫妇的视角分析了这场运动,他们毕生致力于行动,为美国激进主义开辟了广泛的思想史和政治史。阿尔特的跨国分析不仅按时间顺序扩展了他的论点,而且加深了它,特别是关于墨西哥对美国农民-劳工集团的影响。他展示了20世纪10年代墨西哥革命的影响如何推动德克萨斯社会主义者采取更激进的土地政策,强调佃农的困境,这反过来迫使他们面对之前对白人至上主义政治的安逸。到1915年,德州社会主义者是该党左翼的先锋,他们对资本主义提出了激进的批评,并强烈反对美国对墨西哥和欧洲的军事干预。1917年布尔什维克革命的例子只是加速了这一政治轨迹。Alter认为,这些跨国来源使德克萨斯州的农民-劳工激进分子成为“资本主义民族国家的严重威胁”(171)。Alter的广泛方法使得《走向合作的联邦》成为美国农业激进主义文献的重要补充。虽然许多读者会从詹姆斯·格林、马克·劳斯、劳伦斯·古德温和凯尔·威尔金森等人的作品中认出他的部分故事,但奥尔特令人信服地证明,农民-劳工集团是一个连贯的、长达数十年的政治谱系,包含了学者们通常认为是离散的运动,如民粹主义和社会主义。他还表明,在工业资本主义存在期间,农民-劳工集团追求一种前瞻性的激进替代方案,从而为那些将农业政治描述为无可救药的落后或农业综合企业的温床的学者提供了有力的反驳。
Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth: The Transplanted Roots of Farmer-Labor Radicalism in Texas
Thomas Alter II uses a multigenerational biography to recover a long history of agrarian challenges to capitalism in Texas and beyond that makes bold arguments about the genealogy of working-class radicalism in the United States and offers critical lessons for the American left today. Alter sheds new light on familiar subjects in the history of US agrarian radicalism—the Farmers Alliance, People's Party, and Socialist Party of America—by situating them in the transnational context of revolution: Germany in 1848, Mexico in 1910, and Russia in 1917. Focusing on three generations of the German American Meitzen family, who first arrived in Texas from Silesia in 1849 and became leading radical activists, Alter “demonstrates the existence of a decades-long farmer-labor bloc” that ran from the Greenback Party in the 1870s to the Farm-Labor Union of America in the 1920s (2). This farmer-labor bloc, he argues, “moved the political spectrum of US political culture both substantively and ideologically to the left” (2). While Alter sees the reforms of the Progressive Era and the New Deal as weak derivatives of farmer-labor bloc demands, he argues that these measures would not have happened without the agrarian radicalism kept alive by activists like the Meitzens. The farmer-labor bloc they helped build was at its most influential, he contends, when organized for independent political action, not when working within the partisan mainstream. Here Alter sees a clear lesson for the US left today: “Working-class protest movements have more success achieving their demands when they politically organize themselves as a partisan party independent of the two-party system” (3).Alter's through line is a biographical study of three generations of the Meitzen family whose members played leading roles in the development of the farmer-labor bloc, particularly in Texas. He follows their story, with its long pattern of involvement in radical politics, back to Silesia in the early nineteenth century. Here Alter finds the “roots” of the idea for a political movement to serve the needs of farmers and laborers that would later animate the Populist and Socialist movements, and the German immigrants, including the Meitzens among many others, who would actively transplant that idea after violent suppression of the 1848 German revolution forced their immigration to the United States. Arriving in Texas, the Meitzens helped lead a succession of working-class organizations—cooperatives, unions, and political parties among them—that sought to build a political coalition of farmers and wage workers to challenge the growing power of industrial capitalism. Alter uses their multigenerational activism to demonstrate the continuous development of the farmer-labor bloc through myriad linked and generally successive groups, including the Texas People's Party (1873), Greenback Party, Greenback-Labor Party, Grange, Farmers Alliance, People's Party, Farmers’ Union, Socialist Party, Nonpartisan League, American Party, Workers Party, Texas Labor Party, Farmer Labor Party, and more. In each case, Alter analyzes the movement through the lens of the Meitzens, whose long lives of committed action open up a wide-ranging intellectual and political history of American radicalism.Alter's transnational analysis not only extends his argument chronologically but also deepens it, particularly regarding Mexican influence on the American farmer-labor bloc. He shows how the influence of the Mexican Revolution in the 1910s helped push Texas Socialists toward a more radical land policy that emphasized the plight of tenant farmers, which in turn forced them to confront their previous comfort with white supremacist politics. By 1915, Texas Socialists were at the vanguard of the party's left that advanced a radical critique of capitalism and robust opposition to US military intervention in Mexico and Europe. The example of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution only accelerated that political trajectory. These transnational sources, Alter argues, made Texas farmer-labor radicals a “serious threat to the capitalist nation-state” (171).Alter's expansive approach makes Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth a significant addition to the literature on agrarian radicalism in the United States. While many readers will recognize parts of his story from the work of James Green, Mark Lause, Lawrence Goodwyn, and Kyle Wilkison, among others, Alter persuasively demonstrates that the farmer-labor bloc was a coherent, decades-long political lineage that subsumed movements that scholars generally treat as discrete, such as Populism and Socialism. He also shows that the farmer-labor bloc pursued a forward-looking radical alternative to industrial capitalism during its existence, thus offering a powerful counterargument to scholars who portray agrarian politics either as hopelessly backward or as an agribusiness seedbed. Importantly, Alter demonstrates the reach of the farmer-labor bloc well into the 1920s, a relatively understudied period of farmer and labor organizing, through the Nonpartisan League, Robert La Follette's 1924 presidential campaign, and the support from aging agrarian radicals that helped make Franklin D. Roosevelt the standard-bearer of the Democratic Party. Like all scholars of agrarian radicalism, Alter urges historians of urban, industrial working-class movements to take “these country bumpkins” seriously because without them, he asserts, “we might never have left the Gilded Age” (11).While Alter concludes that the Meitzens themselves do not make a great model for contemporary activists on the left because of their frequent willingness to tolerate the dictates of white supremacy, he does identify strategic political lessons from the farmer-labor bloc. The bloc was most successful, he concludes, when it organized independent political action in opposition to the two mainstream parties. Rather than work within the contemporary Democratic Party, Alter argues, working-class activists today should follow the example of the farmer-labor bloc's successes by creating a new political coalition “dedicated to radical economic reform and functioning outside the two-party system” (217).Toward a Cooperative Commonwealth is both provocative and compelling. Alter's crisply written and well-researched account is necessary reading for scholars of labor and left politics, as well as for activists and organizers who seek a better future for working people.