在不确定时期寻找共同点:评估跨大西洋气候变化政策多边主义的前景

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Jakob Wiedekind, Christiane Lemke
{"title":"在不确定时期寻找共同点:评估跨大西洋气候变化政策多边主义的前景","authors":"Jakob Wiedekind, Christiane Lemke","doi":"10.1057/s42738-023-00108-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Climate change policy stands out as a highly salient issue in European and in American public opinion. This article contends that a significant transatlantic consensus supports multilateral action on climate change. Leveraging a broad review of survey data in our time series, the analysis identifies a clear pattern of increasing agreement in public opinion. Yet progress in joint transatlantic climate change action has been rather slow and fragmented. To explain this puzzle, we connect these findings to pitfalls for transatlantic cooperation by weighing partisan polarization and regional differences in the U.S. and country variations in the EU as plausible hurdles to policy consistency. We argue that, beneath broader trends in shared concerns, roadblocks on the national level inhibit the implementation of coherent and effective transatlantic climate change policies.","PeriodicalId":53595,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transatlantic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding common ground in uncertain times: assessing the prospect of multilateralism in transatlantic climate change policy\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Wiedekind, Christiane Lemke\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s42738-023-00108-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Climate change policy stands out as a highly salient issue in European and in American public opinion. This article contends that a significant transatlantic consensus supports multilateral action on climate change. Leveraging a broad review of survey data in our time series, the analysis identifies a clear pattern of increasing agreement in public opinion. Yet progress in joint transatlantic climate change action has been rather slow and fragmented. To explain this puzzle, we connect these findings to pitfalls for transatlantic cooperation by weighing partisan polarization and regional differences in the U.S. and country variations in the EU as plausible hurdles to policy consistency. We argue that, beneath broader trends in shared concerns, roadblocks on the national level inhibit the implementation of coherent and effective transatlantic climate change policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transatlantic Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transatlantic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s42738-023-00108-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transatlantic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s42738-023-00108-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化政策在欧洲和美国公众舆论中都是一个非常突出的问题。本文认为,一个重要的跨大西洋共识支持应对气候变化的多边行动。通过对我们时间序列中调查数据的广泛审查,该分析确定了公众舆论日益一致的明确模式。然而,跨大西洋气候变化联合行动的进展相当缓慢且支离破碎。为了解释这个谜题,我们将这些发现与跨大西洋合作的陷阱联系起来,将美国的党派分化和地区差异以及欧盟的国家差异作为政策一致性的合理障碍进行权衡。我们认为,在共同关注的更广泛趋势下,国家层面的障碍阻碍了跨大西洋气候变化政策连贯有效的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finding common ground in uncertain times: assessing the prospect of multilateralism in transatlantic climate change policy
Abstract Climate change policy stands out as a highly salient issue in European and in American public opinion. This article contends that a significant transatlantic consensus supports multilateral action on climate change. Leveraging a broad review of survey data in our time series, the analysis identifies a clear pattern of increasing agreement in public opinion. Yet progress in joint transatlantic climate change action has been rather slow and fragmented. To explain this puzzle, we connect these findings to pitfalls for transatlantic cooperation by weighing partisan polarization and regional differences in the U.S. and country variations in the EU as plausible hurdles to policy consistency. We argue that, beneath broader trends in shared concerns, roadblocks on the national level inhibit the implementation of coherent and effective transatlantic climate change policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Transatlantic Studies
Journal of Transatlantic Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Transatlantic Studies is the official journal of the Transatlantic Studies Association. It began publication in 2003.    The focus is on the transatlantic region broadly defined to include the Americas and the Caribbean in the west and Europe extending to Russia the Middle East and Africa in the east.The Journal explores and provides multi-disciplinary analysis of this vital region of the world through engagement principally with: -      History -      Literature -      IR and Security Studies -      International Law and Organisation -      Culture and Race -      Slavery and Migration -      Film -      Economics and Business Studies -      Planning and the Environment It is published quarterly and accepts proposals for themed issues as well as individual articles between 5-12,000 words in length. It also has a short book review section. Two peer reviewers evaluate all submissions and any manuscript that divides opinion is then submitted to a third peer reviewer for a final decision. The JTS aims to provide decisions on submissions within 12 weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信