校正商用分光比色计时,参数统计在计算不确定度时的错误应用

IF 1.2 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Sandra Eloísa Balderas-Mata, O. Ramos Soto, J. Medina Márquez
{"title":"校正商用分光比色计时,参数统计在计算不确定度时的错误应用","authors":"Sandra Eloísa Balderas-Mata, O. Ramos Soto, J. Medina Márquez","doi":"10.31349/revmexfis.69.061304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, when calibrating spectrocolorimeters, the uncertainties are calculated based on the premise that the obtained measurements have a Gaussian distribution, but there is no certainty that the latter is completely true. The aim of this work is to show that, when measuring reference materials with different spectrocolorimeters, most of the results do not have, for all the points in the visible spectrum of the spectral curve, a Gaussian distribution. Also, this distribution is not present in measurements of the chromatic coordinates of these materials. These measurements were performed with two integrating sphere spectrocolorimeters; a Minolta 2600d r (portable) and a Gretag Macbeth 7000 r (bench) equipment, under the same measurement parameters and conditions of repeatability, as well as controlled environmental conditions, i.e., 20 ± 1 ◦C. Since a Gaussian distribution is needed to use parametric statistics to calculate the combined uncertainties and consequently, the expanded ones, the statistical method currently used is erroneous. Thus, parametric statistics should not be used to calculate the spectrocolorimeters’ uncertainties.","PeriodicalId":21538,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana De Fisica","volume":"77 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Misapplication of the parametric statistics to calculate the uncertainties when calibrating commercial spectrocolorimeters\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Eloísa Balderas-Mata, O. Ramos Soto, J. Medina Márquez\",\"doi\":\"10.31349/revmexfis.69.061304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, when calibrating spectrocolorimeters, the uncertainties are calculated based on the premise that the obtained measurements have a Gaussian distribution, but there is no certainty that the latter is completely true. The aim of this work is to show that, when measuring reference materials with different spectrocolorimeters, most of the results do not have, for all the points in the visible spectrum of the spectral curve, a Gaussian distribution. Also, this distribution is not present in measurements of the chromatic coordinates of these materials. These measurements were performed with two integrating sphere spectrocolorimeters; a Minolta 2600d r (portable) and a Gretag Macbeth 7000 r (bench) equipment, under the same measurement parameters and conditions of repeatability, as well as controlled environmental conditions, i.e., 20 ± 1 ◦C. Since a Gaussian distribution is needed to use parametric statistics to calculate the combined uncertainties and consequently, the expanded ones, the statistical method currently used is erroneous. Thus, parametric statistics should not be used to calculate the spectrocolorimeters’ uncertainties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Mexicana De Fisica\",\"volume\":\"77 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Mexicana De Fisica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.69.061304\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana De Fisica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31349/revmexfis.69.061304","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,在标定分光比色仪时,不确定度的计算是以得到的测量值服从高斯分布为前提的,但不确定高斯分布是否完全正确。本工作的目的是表明,当用不同的分光比色仪测量标准物质时,大多数结果并不具有光谱曲线中可见光谱中的所有点的高斯分布。同样,这种分布在测量这些材料的色坐标时也不存在。这些测量是用两个积分球分光比色仪进行的;一台Minolta 2600d r(便携式)和一台Gretag Macbeth 7000 r(台式)设备,在相同的测量参数和可重复性条件下,以及受控的环境条件,即20±1◦C。由于高斯分布需要使用参数统计来计算组合不确定性,因此需要使用扩展的不确定性,因此目前使用的统计方法是错误的。因此,不应使用参数统计来计算分光比色计的不确定度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Misapplication of the parametric statistics to calculate the uncertainties when calibrating commercial spectrocolorimeters
Nowadays, when calibrating spectrocolorimeters, the uncertainties are calculated based on the premise that the obtained measurements have a Gaussian distribution, but there is no certainty that the latter is completely true. The aim of this work is to show that, when measuring reference materials with different spectrocolorimeters, most of the results do not have, for all the points in the visible spectrum of the spectral curve, a Gaussian distribution. Also, this distribution is not present in measurements of the chromatic coordinates of these materials. These measurements were performed with two integrating sphere spectrocolorimeters; a Minolta 2600d r (portable) and a Gretag Macbeth 7000 r (bench) equipment, under the same measurement parameters and conditions of repeatability, as well as controlled environmental conditions, i.e., 20 ± 1 ◦C. Since a Gaussian distribution is needed to use parametric statistics to calculate the combined uncertainties and consequently, the expanded ones, the statistical method currently used is erroneous. Thus, parametric statistics should not be used to calculate the spectrocolorimeters’ uncertainties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Mexicana De Fisica
Revista Mexicana De Fisica 物理-物理:综合
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Durante los últimos años, los responsables de la Revista Mexicana de Física, la Revista Mexicana de Física E y la Revista Mexicana de Física S, hemos realizado esfuerzos para fortalecer la presencia de estas publicaciones en nuestra página Web ( http://rmf.smf.mx).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信