卢克莱修(Deerum natura 5.25)、维吉尔(Georgics 1.181)和贺拉斯(Ars poetica 139)中的 Sus 和 Mus

IF 0.7 2区 历史学 N/A CLASSICS
CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1086/726376
T. H. M. Gellar-Goad
{"title":"卢克莱修(Deerum natura 5.25)、维吉尔(Georgics 1.181)和贺拉斯(Ars poetica 139)中的 Sus 和 Mus","authors":"T. H. M. Gellar-Goad","doi":"10.1086/726376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note argues that the Lucretian hexameter-final monosyllable Arcadius sus (5.25) stands at the beginning of a Roman hexameter tradition of satiric final-monosyllable animals, echoed by Vergil’s exiguus mus at Georgics 1.181 and Horace’s ridiculus mus at Ars poetica 139. Lucretius’ sus, in context, deflates and deglamorizes the boarish Labor of Hercules; Vergil’s mus makes the satiric subtext explicit, and playfully suggests that pest control is a Herculean task; Horace’s mus folds the satiric epic pattern in on itself, by using it to satirize epic.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Sus</i> and <i>Mus</i> in Lucretius (<i>De rerum natura</i> 5.25), Vergil (<i>Georgics</i> 1.181), and Horace (<i>Ars poetica</i> 139)\",\"authors\":\"T. H. M. Gellar-Goad\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note argues that the Lucretian hexameter-final monosyllable Arcadius sus (5.25) stands at the beginning of a Roman hexameter tradition of satiric final-monosyllable animals, echoed by Vergil’s exiguus mus at Georgics 1.181 and Horace’s ridiculus mus at Ars poetica 139. Lucretius’ sus, in context, deflates and deglamorizes the boarish Labor of Hercules; Vergil’s mus makes the satiric subtext explicit, and playfully suggests that pest control is a Herculean task; Horace’s mus folds the satiric epic pattern in on itself, by using it to satirize epic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726376\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本注认为,卢克雷tian的六步诗-尾单音节Arcadius sus(5.25)是罗马六步诗-尾单音节讽刺动物传统的开端,与维吉尔的exiguus mus (Georgics 1.181)和贺勒斯的荒诞mus (Ars poetica 139)相呼应。卢克莱修的sus,在语境中,贬低了大力神的苦役;维吉尔的mus使讽刺的潜台词变得明确,并开玩笑地暗示害虫控制是一项艰巨的任务;贺拉斯的诗把讽刺史诗的模式折叠起来,用它来讽刺史诗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sus and Mus in Lucretius (De rerum natura 5.25), Vergil (Georgics 1.181), and Horace (Ars poetica 139)
This note argues that the Lucretian hexameter-final monosyllable Arcadius sus (5.25) stands at the beginning of a Roman hexameter tradition of satiric final-monosyllable animals, echoed by Vergil’s exiguus mus at Georgics 1.181 and Horace’s ridiculus mus at Ars poetica 139. Lucretius’ sus, in context, deflates and deglamorizes the boarish Labor of Hercules; Vergil’s mus makes the satiric subtext explicit, and playfully suggests that pest control is a Herculean task; Horace’s mus folds the satiric epic pattern in on itself, by using it to satirize epic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信