公元前一世纪最早的游学家和旧学院:被忽视的安提阿基亚遗产

IF 0.7 2区历史学 N/A CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1086/726410

Tianqin Ge

{"title":"公元前一世纪最早的游学家和旧学院:被忽视的安提阿基亚遗产","authors":"Tianqin Ge","doi":"10.1086/726410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the references to the members of the Old Academy in Andronicus and Boethus. I defend the proposition that these earliest Peripatetic commentators’ use of Speusippus and Xenocrates is indicative of their notion of “the ancients” and “the recent authors.” These first-century BCE Peripatetics attempt to return to “the ancients” or their philosophical authorities, namely Plato’s first pupils: Aristotle, Speusippus, and Xenocrates. Furthermore, it is argued that this philosophical agenda is indicative of the Antiochean influence, which enables us to reevaluate the philosophical exchanges between different philosophical schools in the first century BCE.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Earliest Peripatetic Commentators in the First Century BCE and the Old Academy: A Neglected Antiochean Legacy\",\"authors\":\"Tianqin Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the references to the members of the Old Academy in Andronicus and Boethus. I defend the proposition that these earliest Peripatetic commentators’ use of Speusippus and Xenocrates is indicative of their notion of “the ancients” and “the recent authors.” These first-century BCE Peripatetics attempt to return to “the ancients” or their philosophical authorities, namely Plato’s first pupils: Aristotle, Speusippus, and Xenocrates. Furthermore, it is argued that this philosophical agenda is indicative of the Antiochean influence, which enables us to reevaluate the philosophical exchanges between different philosophical schools in the first century BCE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726410\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726410","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了安德洛尼克斯和博厄斯对旧学院成员的引用。我认为，这些最早的逍遥游评论者使用斯培西普斯和Xenocrates，表明了他们对“古人”和“近代作者”的看法。这些公元前一世纪的《游学》试图回到“古人”或他们的哲学权威，即柏拉图的第一批学生:亚里士多德、斯培西普斯和Xenocrates。此外，本文认为这一哲学议程反映了安提阿契亚的影响，使我们能够重新评估公元前一世纪不同哲学流派之间的哲学交流。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Earliest Peripatetic Commentators in the First Century BCE and the Old Academy: A Neglected Antiochean Legacy

This paper examines the references to the members of the Old Academy in Andronicus and Boethus. I defend the proposition that these earliest Peripatetic commentators’ use of Speusippus and Xenocrates is indicative of their notion of “the ancients” and “the recent authors.” These first-century BCE Peripatetics attempt to return to “the ancients” or their philosophical authorities, namely Plato’s first pupils: Aristotle, Speusippus, and Xenocrates. Furthermore, it is argued that this philosophical agenda is indicative of the Antiochean influence, which enables us to reevaluate the philosophical exchanges between different philosophical schools in the first century BCE.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.