阿尔西达玛斯与文学史观念:P.密契。2754年发票。

IF 0.7 2区历史学 0 CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1086/726374

Henry L. Spelman

{"title":"阿尔西达玛斯与文学史观念:P.密契。2754年发票。","authors":"Henry L. Spelman","doi":"10.1086/726374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problematic and important P. Mich. Inv. 2754 is generally agreed to preserve part of Alcidamas’ Mouseion, and that work is in turn generally agreed to lie behind the extant Contest of Homer and Hesiod. Building on and sometimes diverging from James Porter’s recent contribution in this journal, this essay offers new answers to long-standing problems. Section 1 interprets the difficult final lines of the Michigan papyrus. Section 2 adduces corroborating evidence by drawing parallels with the Contest. Section 3 argues that the papyrus preserves the end of Alcidamas’ Mouseion, which was also known as his On Homer. Section 4 offers a more holistic interpretation of the Mouseion and its epilogue.","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alcidamas and the Idea of Literary History: P. Mich. Inv. 2754\",\"authors\":\"Henry L. Spelman\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problematic and important P. Mich. Inv. 2754 is generally agreed to preserve part of Alcidamas’ Mouseion, and that work is in turn generally agreed to lie behind the extant Contest of Homer and Hesiod. Building on and sometimes diverging from James Porter’s recent contribution in this journal, this essay offers new answers to long-standing problems. Section 1 interprets the difficult final lines of the Michigan papyrus. Section 2 adduces corroborating evidence by drawing parallels with the Contest. Section 3 argues that the papyrus preserves the end of Alcidamas’ Mouseion, which was also known as his On Homer. Section 4 offers a more holistic interpretation of the Mouseion and its epilogue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726374\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

有问题的和重要的p。人们普遍认为，公元前2754年保存了阿尔西达马斯的《缪西翁》的一部分，而这部作品又被普遍认为是现存的荷马与赫西奥德之争的背后。本文以詹姆斯·波特(James Porter)最近在本刊上发表的文章为基础，对长期存在的问题提供了新的答案。第1节解释了密歇根莎草纸上难懂的最后几行。第2节通过与比赛进行类比，引证了确凿的证据。第三部分认为，纸莎草纸保存了阿尔西达马斯的《缪西翁》的结尾，也被称为《论荷马》。第4节提供了一个更全面的解释Mouseion和它的后记。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Alcidamas and the Idea of Literary History: P. Mich. Inv. 2754

The problematic and important P. Mich. Inv. 2754 is generally agreed to preserve part of Alcidamas’ Mouseion, and that work is in turn generally agreed to lie behind the extant Contest of Homer and Hesiod. Building on and sometimes diverging from James Porter’s recent contribution in this journal, this essay offers new answers to long-standing problems. Section 1 interprets the difficult final lines of the Michigan papyrus. Section 2 adduces corroborating evidence by drawing parallels with the Contest. Section 3 argues that the papyrus preserves the end of Alcidamas’ Mouseion, which was also known as his On Homer. Section 4 offers a more holistic interpretation of the Mouseion and its epilogue.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.