《联合国灭绝种族罪公约》及其如何在缔约国的刑法中执行

IF 1.3 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Zhaisanbek Amanzholov, Aigul Nukusheva, Aizhan Satbayeva, Gulzira Baisalova, Binur Taitorina
{"title":"《联合国灭绝种族罪公约》及其如何在缔约国的刑法中执行","authors":"Zhaisanbek Amanzholov, Aigul Nukusheva, Aizhan Satbayeva, Gulzira Baisalova, Binur Taitorina","doi":"10.1080/10999922.2023.2268901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe issue of developing effective mechanisms to prevent and punish the crime of genocide remains relevant in the modern world. Over the years, the UN has been trying to fulfil the mandate to ensure international security through the prevention of crimes against humanity. In this context, the study of the mechanisms of legal qualification and prosecution for these acts is of particular relevance. At present, the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide remains the main instrument regulating the responsibility for crimes that can be qualified as genocide. The purpose of this study is to analyze the practice of incorporating the provisions of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the problems of their criminal law regulation and modernization. The results are made up of interconnected target, procedural, and evaluation elements, which are based on the method of legal analysis of the legislative practice of countries with different approaches to the issue of genocide. All the examples given in the work show that the process of introducing effective mechanisms of prosecution for genocide by states, among which national courts can be named first, is ongoing, but it is happening very slowly.Keywords: Criminal codes and special laws of state partiesmeans of implementationexpansive interpretationprotected demographic groupsUN Genocide Convention Disclosure statementAuthors declare that they have no conflict of interests.Data availability statementData will be available on request.Notes1 Article 7 of the Criminal Law of the PRC stipulates: “This Law is applicable to the citizens of the People's Republic of China who commit crimes prescribed in this Law outside the territory of the People's Republic of China; however, they may not be investigated if for those crimes this Law prescribes a maximum punishment of fixed-term imprisonment of not more than 3 years. This Law is applicable to state functionaries and servicemen of the People's Republic of China who commit crimes outside the territory of the People's Republic of China.” Article 9 of the Criminal Law of the PRC stipulates: “This Law is applicable to the crimes prescribed in the international treaties concluded or acceded to by the People's Republic of China and over which the People's Republic of China has criminal jurisdiction within its obligation in accordance with the treaties.” http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/cen/laws/clotproc361/#:∼:text=The%20tasks%20of%20the%20Criminal,the%20State%20and%20the%20propertyAdditional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.","PeriodicalId":51805,"journal":{"name":"Public Integrity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The United Nations Convention on Genocide and How It Can Be Implemented in Criminal Codes of State Parties\",\"authors\":\"Zhaisanbek Amanzholov, Aigul Nukusheva, Aizhan Satbayeva, Gulzira Baisalova, Binur Taitorina\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10999922.2023.2268901\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe issue of developing effective mechanisms to prevent and punish the crime of genocide remains relevant in the modern world. Over the years, the UN has been trying to fulfil the mandate to ensure international security through the prevention of crimes against humanity. In this context, the study of the mechanisms of legal qualification and prosecution for these acts is of particular relevance. At present, the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide remains the main instrument regulating the responsibility for crimes that can be qualified as genocide. The purpose of this study is to analyze the practice of incorporating the provisions of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the problems of their criminal law regulation and modernization. The results are made up of interconnected target, procedural, and evaluation elements, which are based on the method of legal analysis of the legislative practice of countries with different approaches to the issue of genocide. All the examples given in the work show that the process of introducing effective mechanisms of prosecution for genocide by states, among which national courts can be named first, is ongoing, but it is happening very slowly.Keywords: Criminal codes and special laws of state partiesmeans of implementationexpansive interpretationprotected demographic groupsUN Genocide Convention Disclosure statementAuthors declare that they have no conflict of interests.Data availability statementData will be available on request.Notes1 Article 7 of the Criminal Law of the PRC stipulates: “This Law is applicable to the citizens of the People's Republic of China who commit crimes prescribed in this Law outside the territory of the People's Republic of China; however, they may not be investigated if for those crimes this Law prescribes a maximum punishment of fixed-term imprisonment of not more than 3 years. This Law is applicable to state functionaries and servicemen of the People's Republic of China who commit crimes outside the territory of the People's Republic of China.” Article 9 of the Criminal Law of the PRC stipulates: “This Law is applicable to the crimes prescribed in the international treaties concluded or acceded to by the People's Republic of China and over which the People's Republic of China has criminal jurisdiction within its obligation in accordance with the treaties.” http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/cen/laws/clotproc361/#:∼:text=The%20tasks%20of%20the%20Criminal,the%20State%20and%20the%20propertyAdditional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Integrity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Integrity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2023.2268901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2023.2268901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要建立预防和惩治灭绝种族罪的有效机制是当今世界面临的重要问题。多年来,联合国一直努力履行其使命,通过预防危害人类罪来确保国际安全。在这方面,研究这些行为的法律资格和起诉机制是特别重要的。目前,1948年的《防止及惩治灭绝种族罪公约》仍然是规定可被定为灭绝种族罪的罪行的责任的主要文书。本研究的目的是分析纳入1948年《灭绝种族罪公约》条款的做法及其刑法规制和现代化的问题。结果由相互关联的目标、程序和评估要素组成,这些要素基于对对种族灭绝问题采取不同方法的国家立法实践的法律分析方法。报告中列举的所有例子都表明,各国正在建立起诉种族灭绝的有效机制,其中首先要提到的是国家法院,但进展非常缓慢。关键词:缔约国刑法和特别法实施手段广义解释受保护的人口群体种族灭绝公约披露声明作者声明无利益冲突数据可用性声明数据可应要求提供。注1《中华人民共和国刑法》第七条规定:“中华人民共和国公民在中华人民共和国领域外犯本法规定之罪的,适用本法;但是,本法规定的最高刑罚为三年以下有期徒刑的,可以不予追究。中华人民共和国国家工作人员和军人在中华人民共和国领域外犯罪的,适用本法。《中华人民共和国刑法》第九条规定:“中华人民共和国缔结或者参加的国际条约所规定的犯罪,中华人民共和国按照条约规定的义务负有刑事管辖权的,适用本法。http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/cen/laws/clotproc361/#: ~:text= %20tasks%20of%20the% 20the% 20the criminal, %20State和%20the% 20the property附加信息资金本研究没有从公共、商业或非营利部门的资助机构获得任何特定的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The United Nations Convention on Genocide and How It Can Be Implemented in Criminal Codes of State Parties
AbstractThe issue of developing effective mechanisms to prevent and punish the crime of genocide remains relevant in the modern world. Over the years, the UN has been trying to fulfil the mandate to ensure international security through the prevention of crimes against humanity. In this context, the study of the mechanisms of legal qualification and prosecution for these acts is of particular relevance. At present, the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide remains the main instrument regulating the responsibility for crimes that can be qualified as genocide. The purpose of this study is to analyze the practice of incorporating the provisions of the 1948 Genocide Convention and the problems of their criminal law regulation and modernization. The results are made up of interconnected target, procedural, and evaluation elements, which are based on the method of legal analysis of the legislative practice of countries with different approaches to the issue of genocide. All the examples given in the work show that the process of introducing effective mechanisms of prosecution for genocide by states, among which national courts can be named first, is ongoing, but it is happening very slowly.Keywords: Criminal codes and special laws of state partiesmeans of implementationexpansive interpretationprotected demographic groupsUN Genocide Convention Disclosure statementAuthors declare that they have no conflict of interests.Data availability statementData will be available on request.Notes1 Article 7 of the Criminal Law of the PRC stipulates: “This Law is applicable to the citizens of the People's Republic of China who commit crimes prescribed in this Law outside the territory of the People's Republic of China; however, they may not be investigated if for those crimes this Law prescribes a maximum punishment of fixed-term imprisonment of not more than 3 years. This Law is applicable to state functionaries and servicemen of the People's Republic of China who commit crimes outside the territory of the People's Republic of China.” Article 9 of the Criminal Law of the PRC stipulates: “This Law is applicable to the crimes prescribed in the international treaties concluded or acceded to by the People's Republic of China and over which the People's Republic of China has criminal jurisdiction within its obligation in accordance with the treaties.” http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/cen/laws/clotproc361/#:∼:text=The%20tasks%20of%20the%20Criminal,the%20State%20and%20the%20propertyAdditional informationFundingThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Public Integrity
Public Integrity PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
85
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信