通过当代西班牙电影感知正义:美学,政治,法律通过当代西班牙电影感知正义:美学,政治,法律,Mónica López Lerma,爱丁堡,爱丁堡大学出版社,2021,183页,19.99英镑(平装本),ISBN: 9781474442053

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Javier Krauel
{"title":"通过当代西班牙电影感知正义:美学,政治,法律通过当代西班牙电影感知正义:美学,政治,法律,Mónica López Lerma,爱丁堡,爱丁堡大学出版社,2021,183页,19.99英镑(平装本),ISBN: 9781474442053","authors":"Javier Krauel","doi":"10.1080/17521483.2023.2271709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 Davide Panagia and Jacques Rancière, ‘Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière’ (2000) 30(2) Diacritics 115.2 See Mónica López Lerma and Julen Etxabe, Rancière and Law (Routledge 2018).3 Desmond Manderson, Songs without Music: Aesthetic Dimensions of Law and Justice (University of California Press 2000) 28.4 Mieke Bal, Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide (Toronto University Press 2002) 137.5 Ruth Hertz, ‘Almodóvar’s High Heels Revisited: A Scandalous or Thought-Provoking Portrayal of a Judge?’ (2023) 17(1) Law and Humanities 193.6 Because the democratic potential of film is exclusively framed in terms of Rancière’s thought, which emphasizes moments of rupture, it opens up the problematic of the inscription of political acts. As Aletta Norval observes, one underdeveloped aspect of Rancière’s characterization of democracy is his tendency ‘to refrain from explicitly engaging with the issues that arise after moments of rupture, when previously excluded senses of wrong become visible and alternative ways of doing things need to become institutionalized and thus inscribed into the current order.’ According to Norval, it is important to supplement Rancière’s characterization of democracy as rupture with an account of how this rupture is inscribed onto the larger political horizon. See Arletta Norval, ‘“Writing a Name in the Sky”: Rancière, Cavell, and the Possibility of Egalitarian Inscription’ in Nikolas Kompridis (ed), The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought (Bloomsbury Academic 2014) 194.","PeriodicalId":42313,"journal":{"name":"Law and Humanities","volume":"25 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensing justice through contemporary Spanish cinema: aesthetics, politics, law <b>Sensing justice through contemporary Spanish cinema: aesthetics, politics, law</b> , by Mónica López Lerma, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2021, 183 pp., £19.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9781474442053\",\"authors\":\"Javier Krauel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17521483.2023.2271709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 Davide Panagia and Jacques Rancière, ‘Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière’ (2000) 30(2) Diacritics 115.2 See Mónica López Lerma and Julen Etxabe, Rancière and Law (Routledge 2018).3 Desmond Manderson, Songs without Music: Aesthetic Dimensions of Law and Justice (University of California Press 2000) 28.4 Mieke Bal, Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide (Toronto University Press 2002) 137.5 Ruth Hertz, ‘Almodóvar’s High Heels Revisited: A Scandalous or Thought-Provoking Portrayal of a Judge?’ (2023) 17(1) Law and Humanities 193.6 Because the democratic potential of film is exclusively framed in terms of Rancière’s thought, which emphasizes moments of rupture, it opens up the problematic of the inscription of political acts. As Aletta Norval observes, one underdeveloped aspect of Rancière’s characterization of democracy is his tendency ‘to refrain from explicitly engaging with the issues that arise after moments of rupture, when previously excluded senses of wrong become visible and alternative ways of doing things need to become institutionalized and thus inscribed into the current order.’ According to Norval, it is important to supplement Rancière’s characterization of democracy as rupture with an account of how this rupture is inscribed onto the larger political horizon. See Arletta Norval, ‘“Writing a Name in the Sky”: Rancière, Cavell, and the Possibility of Egalitarian Inscription’ in Nikolas Kompridis (ed), The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought (Bloomsbury Academic 2014) 194.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2023.2271709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17521483.2023.2271709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注1 Davide Panagia和Jacques ranci,“不同的话语:与Jacques ranci的对话”(2000)30(2)Diacritics 115.2参见Mónica López Lerma和Julen Etxabe, ranci和Law (Routledge 2018)戴斯蒙德·曼德森,《没有音乐的歌曲:法律和正义的美学层面》(加州大学出版社2000年);迈克·巴尔,《人文学科中的旅行概念:粗略指南》(多伦多大学出版社2002年);(2023) 17(1)法律与人文(193.6)由于电影的民主潜力完全是根据朗西特的思想来构建的,他强调断裂的时刻,这就打开了政治行为铭文的问题。正如Aletta Norval所观察到的那样,ranci对民主的描述有一个不发达的方面,那就是他倾向于“避免明确地参与在破裂时刻之后出现的问题,当先前被排除在外的错误感变得可见时,做事的替代方式需要制度化,从而融入当前的秩序。”根据诺瓦尔的观点,重要的是补充朗西弗里特将民主描述为破裂的描述,并说明这种破裂是如何被刻在更大的政治视野上的。参见Arletta Norval,“在天空中书写一个名字”:ranci、卡维尔和平等主义铭文的可能性”,载于Nikolas Kompridis(主编),《政治思想中的美学转向》(Bloomsbury Academic 2014) 194。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensing justice through contemporary Spanish cinema: aesthetics, politics, law Sensing justice through contemporary Spanish cinema: aesthetics, politics, law , by Mónica López Lerma, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2021, 183 pp., £19.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9781474442053
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 Davide Panagia and Jacques Rancière, ‘Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière’ (2000) 30(2) Diacritics 115.2 See Mónica López Lerma and Julen Etxabe, Rancière and Law (Routledge 2018).3 Desmond Manderson, Songs without Music: Aesthetic Dimensions of Law and Justice (University of California Press 2000) 28.4 Mieke Bal, Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide (Toronto University Press 2002) 137.5 Ruth Hertz, ‘Almodóvar’s High Heels Revisited: A Scandalous or Thought-Provoking Portrayal of a Judge?’ (2023) 17(1) Law and Humanities 193.6 Because the democratic potential of film is exclusively framed in terms of Rancière’s thought, which emphasizes moments of rupture, it opens up the problematic of the inscription of political acts. As Aletta Norval observes, one underdeveloped aspect of Rancière’s characterization of democracy is his tendency ‘to refrain from explicitly engaging with the issues that arise after moments of rupture, when previously excluded senses of wrong become visible and alternative ways of doing things need to become institutionalized and thus inscribed into the current order.’ According to Norval, it is important to supplement Rancière’s characterization of democracy as rupture with an account of how this rupture is inscribed onto the larger political horizon. See Arletta Norval, ‘“Writing a Name in the Sky”: Rancière, Cavell, and the Possibility of Egalitarian Inscription’ in Nikolas Kompridis (ed), The Aesthetic Turn in Political Thought (Bloomsbury Academic 2014) 194.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Law and Humanities is a peer-reviewed journal, providing a forum for scholarly discourse within the arts and humanities around the subject of law. For this purpose, the arts and humanities disciplines are taken to include literature, history (including history of art), philosophy, theology, classics and the whole spectrum of performance and representational arts. The remit of the journal does not extend to consideration of the laws that regulate practical aspects of the arts and humanities (such as the law of intellectual property). Law and Humanities is principally concerned to engage with those aspects of human experience which are not empirically quantifiable or scientifically predictable. Each issue will carry four or five major articles of between 8,000 and 12,000 words each. The journal will also carry shorter papers (up to 4,000 words) sharing good practice in law and humanities education; reports of conferences; reviews of books, exhibitions, plays, concerts and other artistic publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信