三个小字?社会保障术语对知识和理赔意图的影响

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Francisco Perez-Arce, Lila Rabinovich, Joanne Yoong, Laith Alattar
{"title":"三个小字?社会保障术语对知识和理赔意图的影响","authors":"Francisco Perez-Arce, Lila Rabinovich, Joanne Yoong, Laith Alattar","doi":"10.1017/s1474747222000269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We study the impact of changing the existing terminology to describe the rules governing Social Security retirement benefits. We provided respondents from a nationally representative online panel with information pertinent to the decision of when to claim Social Security retirement benefits. The content of the information treatments was identical for all respondents, but some were randomly given an alternative set of terms to refer to the key claiming ages (the experimental treatment group), while others were given the current terms (the control group). Despite the minimal nature of the change, there were significant differences in outcomes. Those in the treatment group spent less time reading the information, but their understanding of the Social Security program improved more than the control group. In addition, the treatment delayed retirement claiming intentions by an average of about two and a half months and increased the recommended claiming age to vignette characters by a similar magnitude. The effects were particularly strong for those with low levels of financial literacy. The relative gains in knowledge persisted several months after the treatment.","PeriodicalId":46635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three little words? The impact of social security terminology on knowledge and claiming intentions\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Perez-Arce, Lila Rabinovich, Joanne Yoong, Laith Alattar\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1474747222000269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We study the impact of changing the existing terminology to describe the rules governing Social Security retirement benefits. We provided respondents from a nationally representative online panel with information pertinent to the decision of when to claim Social Security retirement benefits. The content of the information treatments was identical for all respondents, but some were randomly given an alternative set of terms to refer to the key claiming ages (the experimental treatment group), while others were given the current terms (the control group). Despite the minimal nature of the change, there were significant differences in outcomes. Those in the treatment group spent less time reading the information, but their understanding of the Social Security program improved more than the control group. In addition, the treatment delayed retirement claiming intentions by an average of about two and a half months and increased the recommended claiming age to vignette characters by a similar magnitude. The effects were particularly strong for those with low levels of financial literacy. The relative gains in knowledge persisted several months after the treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747222000269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pension Economics & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747222000269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要我们研究了改变现有术语来描述社会保障退休福利规则的影响。我们为来自全国代表性在线小组的受访者提供了与决定何时申请社会保障退休福利相关的信息。信息处理的内容对所有受访者都是相同的,但有些人被随机给予一组替代术语来指代关键索赔年龄(实验治疗组),而其他人则被给予当前术语(对照组)。尽管变化的性质很小,但结果却有显著差异。治疗组的人花更少的时间阅读信息,但他们对社会保障计划的理解比对照组提高了更多。此外,该治疗将退休申请意愿平均推迟了约两个半月,并将推荐的申请年龄提高了相似的幅度。对于那些金融知识水平较低的人来说,这种影响尤其明显。在治疗后的几个月里,知识方面的相对增长仍在持续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Three little words? The impact of social security terminology on knowledge and claiming intentions
Abstract We study the impact of changing the existing terminology to describe the rules governing Social Security retirement benefits. We provided respondents from a nationally representative online panel with information pertinent to the decision of when to claim Social Security retirement benefits. The content of the information treatments was identical for all respondents, but some were randomly given an alternative set of terms to refer to the key claiming ages (the experimental treatment group), while others were given the current terms (the control group). Despite the minimal nature of the change, there were significant differences in outcomes. Those in the treatment group spent less time reading the information, but their understanding of the Social Security program improved more than the control group. In addition, the treatment delayed retirement claiming intentions by an average of about two and a half months and increased the recommended claiming age to vignette characters by a similar magnitude. The effects were particularly strong for those with low levels of financial literacy. The relative gains in knowledge persisted several months after the treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信