1955年以来荆江三口向洞庭湖引水的变化——基于多因素贡献识别

Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
湖泊科学 Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18307/2023.0545
Zhu Boyuan, Xu Qi, Zhu Lingling, Li Yitian
{"title":"1955年以来荆江三口向洞庭湖引水的变化——基于多因素贡献识别","authors":"Zhu Boyuan, Xu Qi, Zhu Lingling, Li Yitian","doi":"10.18307/2023.0545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"近70年来荆江三口分流持续减少,为分析各历史阶段三口分流变化的驱动因素,根据1955—2021年干支流水文、地形实测资料开展研究,并基于控制变量法识别各驱动因素贡献比例。结果表明:三口分流阶段性减少,且集中在5—11月。长江上游降雨减少导致的干流来流偏枯以及下荆江裁弯、葛洲坝拦沙造成的干流河道冲刷和三口口门淤积对三口分流减少促进作用明显,调弦口堵口对三口分流影响不大,三峡水库蓄水后干流河道与三口口门同步冲刷,三口分流变化不大。长江上游汛期降雨减少明显,对5—11月三口分流减少影响较大,且三口分流主要发生于汛期干流中洪水位时,导致在下荆江裁弯期干流河床大幅下切条件下5—11月分流显著减少;葛洲坝调度、三峡水库初期调度和试验性蓄水调度也集中于5—11月,使得5—11月三口分流量分别减小0.4×10<sup>8</sup>、12.5×10<sup>8</sup>和38.6×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup>。调弦口堵口对三口分流的增大作用远小于降雨的减小作用,贡献比例为负值;下荆江裁弯对三口分流减少的贡献比例达85%;水库运用期降雨对三口分流减少的贡献最大,贡献比例大于50%,葛洲坝调度几乎不产生贡献、下游河道调整贡献比例为21%,三峡水库初期调度贡献比例增大至7%、下游河道调整贡献比例为10%,试验性蓄水期则分别上升至23%和19%。长江上游降雨减少至少持续到本世纪末,三口分流年均值将长期呈减少趋势,而荆江干流与三口口门同步冲刷,干流同流量下三口分流仍将变化不大。;Over the past 70 years, the water diversion at the three outlets of the Jingjiang River has been continuously decreasing. In order to investigate the driving factors at different historical stages, this study used the measured hydrological data of the hydrology and topographic features of the mainstream and tributaries from 1955 to 2021, and identified the contributions of the factors based on the variable control approach. The results showed that the water diversion had gradually decreased, and the decrease had mainly occurred from May to November. The decrease in water diversion was greatly aggravated by the reduced mainstream inflow due to the decrease in precipitation in the upper Yangtze, and the erosion of the mainstream bed and deposition at the three outlets caused by the dam projects in the lower Jingjiang River and the sediment trap in the Gezhouba. However, the Tiaoxiankou dam had little effect on water diversion. Since the damming of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), the mainstream and the three tributaries had experienced synchronous riverbed erosion, resulting in an imperceptible change in water diversion. The reduction in rainfall had been concentrated in the rainy season, which had had a major impact on the reduction in water diversion from May to November. Meanwhile, water diversion was mainly concentrated in the rainy season when the mainstream was at flood level, resulting in a large decrease in water diversion from May to November, while the Lower Jingjiang Cutoff Projects triggered a large lowering of the mainstream riverbed. In addition, the operation of Gezhouba, the initial damming of TGR and the experimental damming of TGR were mainly carried out from May to November, reducing water diversion by 0.4×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, 12.5×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup> and 38.6×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The enabling effect of the Tiaoxiaokou dam on water diversion was far less than the constraining effect of rainfall reduction, resulting in a negative contribution ratio for the dam. In comparison, the contribution ratio of the lower Jingjiang dam projects reached 85%. In the post-dam period, precipitation dominated water diversion reduction with a contribution ratio of more than 50%, while Gezhouba operation hardly played a role and its downstream riverbed adjustment produced a contribution ratio of 21%. During the initial and experimental damming of the TGR, the contribution ratios of its operation increased to 7% and 23%, respectively, while those of its downstream riverbed adjustment were 10% and 19%. As the precipitation decline in the upper Yangtze will continue at least until the end of this century, the annual water diversion will show a long-term downward trend, while the water diversion at a given mainstream flow will change little due to synchronous riverbed erosion between the mainstream and the three outlets.","PeriodicalId":37454,"journal":{"name":"湖泊科学","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variations in water diversion at three outlets to Lake Dongting from Jingjiang River based on the identification of multiple factor contributions since 1955\",\"authors\":\"Zhu Boyuan, Xu Qi, Zhu Lingling, Li Yitian\",\"doi\":\"10.18307/2023.0545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"近70年来荆江三口分流持续减少,为分析各历史阶段三口分流变化的驱动因素,根据1955—2021年干支流水文、地形实测资料开展研究,并基于控制变量法识别各驱动因素贡献比例。结果表明:三口分流阶段性减少,且集中在5—11月。长江上游降雨减少导致的干流来流偏枯以及下荆江裁弯、葛洲坝拦沙造成的干流河道冲刷和三口口门淤积对三口分流减少促进作用明显,调弦口堵口对三口分流影响不大,三峡水库蓄水后干流河道与三口口门同步冲刷,三口分流变化不大。长江上游汛期降雨减少明显,对5—11月三口分流减少影响较大,且三口分流主要发生于汛期干流中洪水位时,导致在下荆江裁弯期干流河床大幅下切条件下5—11月分流显著减少;葛洲坝调度、三峡水库初期调度和试验性蓄水调度也集中于5—11月,使得5—11月三口分流量分别减小0.4×10<sup>8</sup>、12.5×10<sup>8</sup>和38.6×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup>。调弦口堵口对三口分流的增大作用远小于降雨的减小作用,贡献比例为负值;下荆江裁弯对三口分流减少的贡献比例达85%;水库运用期降雨对三口分流减少的贡献最大,贡献比例大于50%,葛洲坝调度几乎不产生贡献、下游河道调整贡献比例为21%,三峡水库初期调度贡献比例增大至7%、下游河道调整贡献比例为10%,试验性蓄水期则分别上升至23%和19%。长江上游降雨减少至少持续到本世纪末,三口分流年均值将长期呈减少趋势,而荆江干流与三口口门同步冲刷,干流同流量下三口分流仍将变化不大。;Over the past 70 years, the water diversion at the three outlets of the Jingjiang River has been continuously decreasing. In order to investigate the driving factors at different historical stages, this study used the measured hydrological data of the hydrology and topographic features of the mainstream and tributaries from 1955 to 2021, and identified the contributions of the factors based on the variable control approach. The results showed that the water diversion had gradually decreased, and the decrease had mainly occurred from May to November. The decrease in water diversion was greatly aggravated by the reduced mainstream inflow due to the decrease in precipitation in the upper Yangtze, and the erosion of the mainstream bed and deposition at the three outlets caused by the dam projects in the lower Jingjiang River and the sediment trap in the Gezhouba. However, the Tiaoxiankou dam had little effect on water diversion. Since the damming of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), the mainstream and the three tributaries had experienced synchronous riverbed erosion, resulting in an imperceptible change in water diversion. The reduction in rainfall had been concentrated in the rainy season, which had had a major impact on the reduction in water diversion from May to November. Meanwhile, water diversion was mainly concentrated in the rainy season when the mainstream was at flood level, resulting in a large decrease in water diversion from May to November, while the Lower Jingjiang Cutoff Projects triggered a large lowering of the mainstream riverbed. In addition, the operation of Gezhouba, the initial damming of TGR and the experimental damming of TGR were mainly carried out from May to November, reducing water diversion by 0.4×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, 12.5×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup> and 38.6×10<sup>8</sup> m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. The enabling effect of the Tiaoxiaokou dam on water diversion was far less than the constraining effect of rainfall reduction, resulting in a negative contribution ratio for the dam. In comparison, the contribution ratio of the lower Jingjiang dam projects reached 85%. In the post-dam period, precipitation dominated water diversion reduction with a contribution ratio of more than 50%, while Gezhouba operation hardly played a role and its downstream riverbed adjustment produced a contribution ratio of 21%. During the initial and experimental damming of the TGR, the contribution ratios of its operation increased to 7% and 23%, respectively, while those of its downstream riverbed adjustment were 10% and 19%. As the precipitation decline in the upper Yangtze will continue at least until the end of this century, the annual water diversion will show a long-term downward trend, while the water diversion at a given mainstream flow will change little due to synchronous riverbed erosion between the mainstream and the three outlets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"湖泊科学\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"湖泊科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18307/2023.0545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"湖泊科学","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18307/2023.0545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近70年来荆江三口分流持续减少,为分析各历史阶段三口分流变化的驱动因素,根据1955—2021年干支流水文、地形实测资料开展研究,并基于控制变量法识别各驱动因素贡献比例。结果表明:三口分流阶段性减少,且集中在5—11月。长江上游降雨减少导致的干流来流偏枯以及下荆江裁弯、葛洲坝拦沙造成的干流河道冲刷和三口口门淤积对三口分流减少促进作用明显,调弦口堵口对三口分流影响不大,三峡水库蓄水后干流河道与三口口门同步冲刷,三口分流变化不大。长江上游汛期降雨减少明显,对5—11月三口分流减少影响较大,且三口分流主要发生于汛期干流中洪水位时,导致在下荆江裁弯期干流河床大幅下切条件下5—11月分流显著减少;葛洲坝调度、三峡水库初期调度和试验性蓄水调度也集中于5—11月,使得5—11月三口分流量分别减小0.4×108、12.5×108和38.6×108 m3。调弦口堵口对三口分流的增大作用远小于降雨的减小作用,贡献比例为负值;下荆江裁弯对三口分流减少的贡献比例达85%;水库运用期降雨对三口分流减少的贡献最大,贡献比例大于50%,葛洲坝调度几乎不产生贡献、下游河道调整贡献比例为21%,三峡水库初期调度贡献比例增大至7%、下游河道调整贡献比例为10%,试验性蓄水期则分别上升至23%和19%。长江上游降雨减少至少持续到本世纪末,三口分流年均值将长期呈减少趋势,而荆江干流与三口口门同步冲刷,干流同流量下三口分流仍将变化不大。;Over the past 70 years, the water diversion at the three outlets of the Jingjiang River has been continuously decreasing. In order to investigate the driving factors at different historical stages, this study used the measured hydrological data of the hydrology and topographic features of the mainstream and tributaries from 1955 to 2021, and identified the contributions of the factors based on the variable control approach. The results showed that the water diversion had gradually decreased, and the decrease had mainly occurred from May to November. The decrease in water diversion was greatly aggravated by the reduced mainstream inflow due to the decrease in precipitation in the upper Yangtze, and the erosion of the mainstream bed and deposition at the three outlets caused by the dam projects in the lower Jingjiang River and the sediment trap in the Gezhouba. However, the Tiaoxiankou dam had little effect on water diversion. Since the damming of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), the mainstream and the three tributaries had experienced synchronous riverbed erosion, resulting in an imperceptible change in water diversion. The reduction in rainfall had been concentrated in the rainy season, which had had a major impact on the reduction in water diversion from May to November. Meanwhile, water diversion was mainly concentrated in the rainy season when the mainstream was at flood level, resulting in a large decrease in water diversion from May to November, while the Lower Jingjiang Cutoff Projects triggered a large lowering of the mainstream riverbed. In addition, the operation of Gezhouba, the initial damming of TGR and the experimental damming of TGR were mainly carried out from May to November, reducing water diversion by 0.4×108 m3, 12.5×108 m3 and 38.6×108 m3, respectively. The enabling effect of the Tiaoxiaokou dam on water diversion was far less than the constraining effect of rainfall reduction, resulting in a negative contribution ratio for the dam. In comparison, the contribution ratio of the lower Jingjiang dam projects reached 85%. In the post-dam period, precipitation dominated water diversion reduction with a contribution ratio of more than 50%, while Gezhouba operation hardly played a role and its downstream riverbed adjustment produced a contribution ratio of 21%. During the initial and experimental damming of the TGR, the contribution ratios of its operation increased to 7% and 23%, respectively, while those of its downstream riverbed adjustment were 10% and 19%. As the precipitation decline in the upper Yangtze will continue at least until the end of this century, the annual water diversion will show a long-term downward trend, while the water diversion at a given mainstream flow will change little due to synchronous riverbed erosion between the mainstream and the three outlets.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variations in water diversion at three outlets to Lake Dongting from Jingjiang River based on the identification of multiple factor contributions since 1955
近70年来荆江三口分流持续减少,为分析各历史阶段三口分流变化的驱动因素,根据1955—2021年干支流水文、地形实测资料开展研究,并基于控制变量法识别各驱动因素贡献比例。结果表明:三口分流阶段性减少,且集中在5—11月。长江上游降雨减少导致的干流来流偏枯以及下荆江裁弯、葛洲坝拦沙造成的干流河道冲刷和三口口门淤积对三口分流减少促进作用明显,调弦口堵口对三口分流影响不大,三峡水库蓄水后干流河道与三口口门同步冲刷,三口分流变化不大。长江上游汛期降雨减少明显,对5—11月三口分流减少影响较大,且三口分流主要发生于汛期干流中洪水位时,导致在下荆江裁弯期干流河床大幅下切条件下5—11月分流显著减少;葛洲坝调度、三峡水库初期调度和试验性蓄水调度也集中于5—11月,使得5—11月三口分流量分别减小0.4×108、12.5×108和38.6×108 m3。调弦口堵口对三口分流的增大作用远小于降雨的减小作用,贡献比例为负值;下荆江裁弯对三口分流减少的贡献比例达85%;水库运用期降雨对三口分流减少的贡献最大,贡献比例大于50%,葛洲坝调度几乎不产生贡献、下游河道调整贡献比例为21%,三峡水库初期调度贡献比例增大至7%、下游河道调整贡献比例为10%,试验性蓄水期则分别上升至23%和19%。长江上游降雨减少至少持续到本世纪末,三口分流年均值将长期呈减少趋势,而荆江干流与三口口门同步冲刷,干流同流量下三口分流仍将变化不大。;Over the past 70 years, the water diversion at the three outlets of the Jingjiang River has been continuously decreasing. In order to investigate the driving factors at different historical stages, this study used the measured hydrological data of the hydrology and topographic features of the mainstream and tributaries from 1955 to 2021, and identified the contributions of the factors based on the variable control approach. The results showed that the water diversion had gradually decreased, and the decrease had mainly occurred from May to November. The decrease in water diversion was greatly aggravated by the reduced mainstream inflow due to the decrease in precipitation in the upper Yangtze, and the erosion of the mainstream bed and deposition at the three outlets caused by the dam projects in the lower Jingjiang River and the sediment trap in the Gezhouba. However, the Tiaoxiankou dam had little effect on water diversion. Since the damming of the Three Gorges Reservoir (TGR), the mainstream and the three tributaries had experienced synchronous riverbed erosion, resulting in an imperceptible change in water diversion. The reduction in rainfall had been concentrated in the rainy season, which had had a major impact on the reduction in water diversion from May to November. Meanwhile, water diversion was mainly concentrated in the rainy season when the mainstream was at flood level, resulting in a large decrease in water diversion from May to November, while the Lower Jingjiang Cutoff Projects triggered a large lowering of the mainstream riverbed. In addition, the operation of Gezhouba, the initial damming of TGR and the experimental damming of TGR were mainly carried out from May to November, reducing water diversion by 0.4×108 m3, 12.5×108 m3 and 38.6×108 m3, respectively. The enabling effect of the Tiaoxiaokou dam on water diversion was far less than the constraining effect of rainfall reduction, resulting in a negative contribution ratio for the dam. In comparison, the contribution ratio of the lower Jingjiang dam projects reached 85%. In the post-dam period, precipitation dominated water diversion reduction with a contribution ratio of more than 50%, while Gezhouba operation hardly played a role and its downstream riverbed adjustment produced a contribution ratio of 21%. During the initial and experimental damming of the TGR, the contribution ratios of its operation increased to 7% and 23%, respectively, while those of its downstream riverbed adjustment were 10% and 19%. As the precipitation decline in the upper Yangtze will continue at least until the end of this century, the annual water diversion will show a long-term downward trend, while the water diversion at a given mainstream flow will change little due to synchronous riverbed erosion between the mainstream and the three outlets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
湖泊科学
湖泊科学 Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3253
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信