{"title":"四参数与五参数物流方程测定赭曲霉毒素A检出限的比较","authors":"Siti Noraini Bunawan, Noor Azlina Masdor","doi":"10.54987/bstr.v11i1.831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ochratoxin A, a type of mycotoxin, was detected in plant sample matrices using the \"optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy\" (OWLS) method. The calibration curve for the detection of ochratoxin A utilizing \"optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy\" (OWLS) displayed a sigmoidal shape; hence, the 5-parameter logistics (5-PL) or 4-parameters logistics (4-PL) model should be used to fit the data rather than a linear model. Through the use of error function analysis and various functions such as Bias Factor, corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc), adjusted correlation coefficient (adjR2), Hannan–Quinn information criterion (HQC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Accuracy Factor, the distinction between the 5-PL and 4-PL models is found to be inconsistent. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) confidence intervals overlapped, indicating no difference between the two methods; the 4-PL model was chosen because of its fewer parameters. The Limits of Detection (LOD) calculated using the 4-PL equation was 0.818 ng/mL, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.526-1.143 ng/mL. This value falls within the estimated range of 0.5 to 10 ng/mL found in the first investigation. Not only was the linear component of the data curve successfully represented by this study's use of the 4-PL model, but the model was also successful in representing the entire date curve.","PeriodicalId":436607,"journal":{"name":"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between the Four-parameter and Five-parameter Logistics Equations in the Determination of the Limits of Detection of Ochratoxin A\",\"authors\":\"Siti Noraini Bunawan, Noor Azlina Masdor\",\"doi\":\"10.54987/bstr.v11i1.831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ochratoxin A, a type of mycotoxin, was detected in plant sample matrices using the \\\"optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy\\\" (OWLS) method. The calibration curve for the detection of ochratoxin A utilizing \\\"optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy\\\" (OWLS) displayed a sigmoidal shape; hence, the 5-parameter logistics (5-PL) or 4-parameters logistics (4-PL) model should be used to fit the data rather than a linear model. Through the use of error function analysis and various functions such as Bias Factor, corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc), adjusted correlation coefficient (adjR2), Hannan–Quinn information criterion (HQC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Accuracy Factor, the distinction between the 5-PL and 4-PL models is found to be inconsistent. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) confidence intervals overlapped, indicating no difference between the two methods; the 4-PL model was chosen because of its fewer parameters. The Limits of Detection (LOD) calculated using the 4-PL equation was 0.818 ng/mL, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.526-1.143 ng/mL. This value falls within the estimated range of 0.5 to 10 ng/mL found in the first investigation. Not only was the linear component of the data curve successfully represented by this study's use of the 4-PL model, but the model was also successful in representing the entire date curve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54987/bstr.v11i1.831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioremediation Science and Technology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54987/bstr.v11i1.831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用“光波导光模光谱法”(owl)对植物样品基质中的赭曲霉毒素A进行了检测。光波导光模光谱法检测赭曲霉毒素A的校准曲线呈s形;因此,应该使用5参数物流(5-PL)或4参数物流(4-PL)模型来拟合数据,而不是线性模型。通过误差函数分析以及Bias Factor、corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc)、adjusted correlation coefficient (adjR2)、Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion (HQC)、Root Mean Square error (RMSE)、Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)、Accuracy Factor等函数,发现5-PL和4-PL模型之间的区别并不一致。半数最大有效浓度(EC50)置信区间重叠,说明两种方法无差异;选择4-PL模型是因为其参数较少。采用4-PL方程计算的检出限(LOD)为0.818 ng/mL, 95%置信区间为0.526 ~ 1.143 ng/mL。该值落在第一次调查中发现的0.5至10 ng/mL的估计范围内。本研究使用4-PL模型不仅成功地表示了数据曲线的线性分量,而且该模型还成功地表示了整个数据曲线。
Comparison between the Four-parameter and Five-parameter Logistics Equations in the Determination of the Limits of Detection of Ochratoxin A
Ochratoxin A, a type of mycotoxin, was detected in plant sample matrices using the "optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy" (OWLS) method. The calibration curve for the detection of ochratoxin A utilizing "optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy" (OWLS) displayed a sigmoidal shape; hence, the 5-parameter logistics (5-PL) or 4-parameters logistics (4-PL) model should be used to fit the data rather than a linear model. Through the use of error function analysis and various functions such as Bias Factor, corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc), adjusted correlation coefficient (adjR2), Hannan–Quinn information criterion (HQC), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Accuracy Factor, the distinction between the 5-PL and 4-PL models is found to be inconsistent. The half maximal effective concentration (EC50) confidence intervals overlapped, indicating no difference between the two methods; the 4-PL model was chosen because of its fewer parameters. The Limits of Detection (LOD) calculated using the 4-PL equation was 0.818 ng/mL, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.526-1.143 ng/mL. This value falls within the estimated range of 0.5 to 10 ng/mL found in the first investigation. Not only was the linear component of the data curve successfully represented by this study's use of the 4-PL model, but the model was also successful in representing the entire date curve.