检察官参与民事诉讼的若干问题

E. V. Mikhailova
{"title":"检察官参与民事诉讼的若干问题","authors":"E. V. Mikhailova","doi":"10.21639/2313-6715.2023.2.8.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article raises the problem of the prosecutor's participation in the so-called «civil process». It is shown that in the framework of civil and arbitration proceedings, a significant number of cases are considered in which the subject of protection is the state interest. At the same time, traditionally, the participation of the prosecutor in the judicial review and resolution of civil cases is reduced to two forms: initiative (initiation of proceedings) and participation in the case for giving an opinion. The scientific literature usually focuses on the fact that in any case, the prosecutor does not protect the interests of a particular person, but implements the function of supervising the legality, including initiating civil cases and participating in them. However, when the State is a party to the case, and the subject of protection is the state interest, the procedural status of the prosecutor should be different. His role in the consideration and resolution of civil cases is similar to the role of the plaintiff, and in this case, being part of the state apparatus, its official, he acts not as a «procedural plaintiff», but as a participant in a legal conflict. It is proved that in civil cases with the participation of the state, the prosecutor should be considered as a «full-fledged» party in the case, with the granting of the whole complex of procedural rights, including special (administrative) rights. The current procedural and legal regulation of the status of the prosecutor's opinion in the civil process, the lack of the prosecutor's right to initiate proceedings in the arbitration court in defense of the rights and interests of subjects of entrepreneurial and other economic activity is criticized. In modern conditions, the interests of protection and state support of entrepreneurship require that small and medium-sized businesses, peasant (farmer) farms and other entities engaged in entrepreneurial and other economic activities can exercise their constitutional right to receive qualified legal assistance. At the same time, the Prosecutor's office should monitor compliance with the legislation regulating entrepreneurial activity, including when considering cases in court. Proposals have been made to improve the current procedural legislation in terms of improving the procedural and legal position of the prosecutor in arbitration and civil proceedings, as well as giving him the legal status of a party in cases involving the state.","PeriodicalId":471931,"journal":{"name":"Пролог","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Problems of the Participation of the Prosecutor in the Civil Process\",\"authors\":\"E. V. Mikhailova\",\"doi\":\"10.21639/2313-6715.2023.2.8.\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article raises the problem of the prosecutor's participation in the so-called «civil process». It is shown that in the framework of civil and arbitration proceedings, a significant number of cases are considered in which the subject of protection is the state interest. At the same time, traditionally, the participation of the prosecutor in the judicial review and resolution of civil cases is reduced to two forms: initiative (initiation of proceedings) and participation in the case for giving an opinion. The scientific literature usually focuses on the fact that in any case, the prosecutor does not protect the interests of a particular person, but implements the function of supervising the legality, including initiating civil cases and participating in them. However, when the State is a party to the case, and the subject of protection is the state interest, the procedural status of the prosecutor should be different. His role in the consideration and resolution of civil cases is similar to the role of the plaintiff, and in this case, being part of the state apparatus, its official, he acts not as a «procedural plaintiff», but as a participant in a legal conflict. It is proved that in civil cases with the participation of the state, the prosecutor should be considered as a «full-fledged» party in the case, with the granting of the whole complex of procedural rights, including special (administrative) rights. The current procedural and legal regulation of the status of the prosecutor's opinion in the civil process, the lack of the prosecutor's right to initiate proceedings in the arbitration court in defense of the rights and interests of subjects of entrepreneurial and other economic activity is criticized. In modern conditions, the interests of protection and state support of entrepreneurship require that small and medium-sized businesses, peasant (farmer) farms and other entities engaged in entrepreneurial and other economic activities can exercise their constitutional right to receive qualified legal assistance. At the same time, the Prosecutor's office should monitor compliance with the legislation regulating entrepreneurial activity, including when considering cases in court. Proposals have been made to improve the current procedural legislation in terms of improving the procedural and legal position of the prosecutor in arbitration and civil proceedings, as well as giving him the legal status of a party in cases involving the state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Пролог\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Пролог\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2023.2.8.\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Пролог","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21639/2313-6715.2023.2.8.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该条提出了检察官参与所谓“民事程序”的问题。结果表明,在民事和仲裁程序的框架中,考虑到保护主体是国家利益的大量案例。同时,传统上,检察官参与民事案件的司法审查和解决被简化为两种形式:主动(提起诉讼)和参与案件提出意见。科学文献通常关注的是,在任何情况下,检察官都不是维护特定个人的利益,而是履行监督民事诉讼合法性的职能,包括提起民事诉讼和参与民事诉讼。但是,当国家是案件的当事人,保护的主体是国家利益时,检察官的诉讼地位就应该有所不同。他在审议和解决民事案件中的角色类似于原告的角色,在这种情况下,作为国家机器的一部分,其官员,他不是作为“程序性原告”,而是作为法律冲突的参与者。事实证明,在有国家参与的民事案件中,检察官应被视为案件的“完全”当事人,享有整个复杂的程序权利,包括特别(行政)权利。现行程序和法律规定的检察官在民事诉讼中的地位,缺乏检察官在仲裁法庭提起诉讼以捍卫创业等经济活动主体权益的权利受到批评。在现代条件下,保护和国家支持创业的利益要求中小企业、农民农场和其他从事创业和其他经济活动的实体能够行使宪法赋予的获得合格法律援助的权利。与此同时,检察官办公室应监测对管理企业活动的立法的遵守情况,包括在法庭审理案件时。已提出建议,以改进目前的程序法,改善检察官在仲裁和民事诉讼中的程序和法律地位,并使他在涉及国家的案件中具有当事人的法律地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some Problems of the Participation of the Prosecutor in the Civil Process
The article raises the problem of the prosecutor's participation in the so-called «civil process». It is shown that in the framework of civil and arbitration proceedings, a significant number of cases are considered in which the subject of protection is the state interest. At the same time, traditionally, the participation of the prosecutor in the judicial review and resolution of civil cases is reduced to two forms: initiative (initiation of proceedings) and participation in the case for giving an opinion. The scientific literature usually focuses on the fact that in any case, the prosecutor does not protect the interests of a particular person, but implements the function of supervising the legality, including initiating civil cases and participating in them. However, when the State is a party to the case, and the subject of protection is the state interest, the procedural status of the prosecutor should be different. His role in the consideration and resolution of civil cases is similar to the role of the plaintiff, and in this case, being part of the state apparatus, its official, he acts not as a «procedural plaintiff», but as a participant in a legal conflict. It is proved that in civil cases with the participation of the state, the prosecutor should be considered as a «full-fledged» party in the case, with the granting of the whole complex of procedural rights, including special (administrative) rights. The current procedural and legal regulation of the status of the prosecutor's opinion in the civil process, the lack of the prosecutor's right to initiate proceedings in the arbitration court in defense of the rights and interests of subjects of entrepreneurial and other economic activity is criticized. In modern conditions, the interests of protection and state support of entrepreneurship require that small and medium-sized businesses, peasant (farmer) farms and other entities engaged in entrepreneurial and other economic activities can exercise their constitutional right to receive qualified legal assistance. At the same time, the Prosecutor's office should monitor compliance with the legislation regulating entrepreneurial activity, including when considering cases in court. Proposals have been made to improve the current procedural legislation in terms of improving the procedural and legal position of the prosecutor in arbitration and civil proceedings, as well as giving him the legal status of a party in cases involving the state.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信