教师对批判性公民身份的定量推理的观点

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gregory D. Foley, Deependra Budhathoki, Amrit B. Thapa, Harman P. Aryal
{"title":"教师对批判性公民身份的定量推理的观点","authors":"Gregory D. Foley, Deependra Budhathoki, Amrit B. Thapa, Harman P. Aryal","doi":"10.1007/s11858-023-01520-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A tertiary course in Quantitative Reasoning (QR) has the potential to develop key practical and intellectual skills for citizenship, such as critical thinking, problem solving, quantitative literacy, and oral and written communication. In this article, we present research conducted on four instructors of such a QR course for students enrolled in a wide variety of nonscience degree programs at a university in the United States. The course used a student-inquiry approach to proportional reasoning, probability, statistical reasoning, and mathematical modeling. The findings are framed by a 5 C model of QR, which entails C ritical thinking to link real-world C ontexts to mathematical C oncepts supported by student C ollaboration and QR C ompetencies. The research addressed the questions of how university instructors support student development of the skills needed for critical citizenship and how this support relates to the 5 C model. We found that three of the four instructors viewed critical thinking as a central goal of the QR course and as supporting citizenship education. All four engaged students in tasks designed to develop a combination of skills associated citizenship, including critical thinking, self-questioning, collaboration, and communication. The discussion addresses such issues as the course’s merits and challenges, student engagement, the relative importance of the five Cs, the importance of instructional autonomy, and recommendations for related professional development and future research.","PeriodicalId":51441,"journal":{"name":"Zdm-Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instructor perspectives on quantitative reasoning for critical citizenship\",\"authors\":\"Gregory D. Foley, Deependra Budhathoki, Amrit B. Thapa, Harman P. Aryal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11858-023-01520-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A tertiary course in Quantitative Reasoning (QR) has the potential to develop key practical and intellectual skills for citizenship, such as critical thinking, problem solving, quantitative literacy, and oral and written communication. In this article, we present research conducted on four instructors of such a QR course for students enrolled in a wide variety of nonscience degree programs at a university in the United States. The course used a student-inquiry approach to proportional reasoning, probability, statistical reasoning, and mathematical modeling. The findings are framed by a 5 C model of QR, which entails C ritical thinking to link real-world C ontexts to mathematical C oncepts supported by student C ollaboration and QR C ompetencies. The research addressed the questions of how university instructors support student development of the skills needed for critical citizenship and how this support relates to the 5 C model. We found that three of the four instructors viewed critical thinking as a central goal of the QR course and as supporting citizenship education. All four engaged students in tasks designed to develop a combination of skills associated citizenship, including critical thinking, self-questioning, collaboration, and communication. The discussion addresses such issues as the course’s merits and challenges, student engagement, the relative importance of the five Cs, the importance of instructional autonomy, and recommendations for related professional development and future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdm-Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdm-Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01520-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdm-Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01520-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

定量推理(QR)的高等教育课程有潜力培养公民的关键实践和智力技能,如批判性思维,解决问题,定量素养,口头和书面沟通。在本文中,我们介绍了对美国一所大学招收各种非科学学位课程的学生的QR课程的四名教师进行的研究。该课程采用学生探究的方法来学习比例推理、概率、统计推理和数学建模。这一发现是由一个5c的QR模型构成的,该模型需要批判性的C思维,将现实世界的C环境与学生C协作和QR C能力支持的数学C概念联系起来。该研究解决了大学教师如何支持学生培养批判性公民所需技能的问题,以及这种支持如何与5c模型相关联。我们发现,四名教师中有三名将批判性思维视为QR课程的中心目标,并将其视为公民教育的支持。这四门课程都让学生参与到培养与公民身份相关的技能的任务中,包括批判性思维、自我质疑、协作和沟通。讨论涉及课程的优点和挑战、学生参与、五个c的相对重要性、教学自主的重要性以及相关专业发展和未来研究的建议等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Instructor perspectives on quantitative reasoning for critical citizenship

Instructor perspectives on quantitative reasoning for critical citizenship
Abstract A tertiary course in Quantitative Reasoning (QR) has the potential to develop key practical and intellectual skills for citizenship, such as critical thinking, problem solving, quantitative literacy, and oral and written communication. In this article, we present research conducted on four instructors of such a QR course for students enrolled in a wide variety of nonscience degree programs at a university in the United States. The course used a student-inquiry approach to proportional reasoning, probability, statistical reasoning, and mathematical modeling. The findings are framed by a 5 C model of QR, which entails C ritical thinking to link real-world C ontexts to mathematical C oncepts supported by student C ollaboration and QR C ompetencies. The research addressed the questions of how university instructors support student development of the skills needed for critical citizenship and how this support relates to the 5 C model. We found that three of the four instructors viewed critical thinking as a central goal of the QR course and as supporting citizenship education. All four engaged students in tasks designed to develop a combination of skills associated citizenship, including critical thinking, self-questioning, collaboration, and communication. The discussion addresses such issues as the course’s merits and challenges, student engagement, the relative importance of the five Cs, the importance of instructional autonomy, and recommendations for related professional development and future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zdm-Mathematics Education
Zdm-Mathematics Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: ZDM – Mathematics Education is one of the oldest mathematics education research journals. The papers appearing in the seven themed issues per year are strictly by invitation only followed by internal peer review by the guest-editors and external review by invited experts. The journal exists to survey, discuss and extend current research-based and theoretical perspectives as well as to create a forum for critical analyses of issues within mathematics education. The audience is pre-dominantly mathematics education researchers around the world interested in current developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信