{"title":"破碎和断层","authors":"Stefan Keym","doi":"10.52412/mf.2023.h3.3093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"
 
 
 The article discusses features of (dis-)continuity between the three German musicological societies which existed before the foundation of the current “Gesellschaft für Musikforschung” (GfM). When the GfM was founded by Friedrich Blume in 1946/1947, it adopted the name of the first German-language musi- cological society: Robert Eitner’s “Gesellschaft für Musikforschung” (1868–1905). However, it has much more in common with its later predecessors: the “Internationale Musikgesellschaft” (1899–1914) and the “Deutsche Musikgesellschaft” (1918–1939). These societies established precedents for the structure of musicological societies, their congresses and journals. Even the close cooperation with a music publisher was continued by the new GfM, although Blume changed the partner from Breitkopf & Härtel to Bärenreiter. Furthermore, all three societies faced similar challenges: the relationship between musicological research and musical life, the tension between nationalist agendas and international cooperation, and the fluctuating forms of organization, which were easily destabilised in times of political turmoil.
 
 
","PeriodicalId":42161,"journal":{"name":"MUSIKFORSCHUNG","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brüche und Kontinuitäten\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Keym\",\"doi\":\"10.52412/mf.2023.h3.3093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"
 
 
 The article discusses features of (dis-)continuity between the three German musicological societies which existed before the foundation of the current “Gesellschaft für Musikforschung” (GfM). When the GfM was founded by Friedrich Blume in 1946/1947, it adopted the name of the first German-language musi- cological society: Robert Eitner’s “Gesellschaft für Musikforschung” (1868–1905). However, it has much more in common with its later predecessors: the “Internationale Musikgesellschaft” (1899–1914) and the “Deutsche Musikgesellschaft” (1918–1939). These societies established precedents for the structure of musicological societies, their congresses and journals. Even the close cooperation with a music publisher was continued by the new GfM, although Blume changed the partner from Breitkopf & Härtel to Bärenreiter. Furthermore, all three societies faced similar challenges: the relationship between musicological research and musical life, the tension between nationalist agendas and international cooperation, and the fluctuating forms of organization, which were easily destabilised in times of political turmoil.
 
 
\",\"PeriodicalId\":42161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSIKFORSCHUNG\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSIKFORSCHUNG\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52412/mf.2023.h3.3093\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSIKFORSCHUNG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52412/mf.2023.h3.3093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
& # x0D;& # x0D;& # x0D;本文讨论了在当前的“德国音乐协会”(GfM)成立之前存在的三个德国音乐学会之间(不)连续性的特征。当弗里德里希·布鲁姆于1946/1947年创立GfM时,它采用了第一个德语音乐生态学会的名称:罗伯特·艾特纳的“Gesellschaft f r Musikforschung”(1868-1905)。然而,它与后来的前辈有更多的共同之处:“国际音乐协会”(1899-1914)和“德国音乐协会”(1918-1939)。这些学会为音乐学学会的结构、代表大会和期刊建立了先例。即使是与音乐出版商的密切合作也被新的GfM所延续,尽管布鲁姆将合作伙伴从Breitkopf &Härtel到Bärenreiter。此外,这三个社会都面临着类似的挑战:音乐学研究与音乐生活之间的关系,民族主义议程与国际合作之间的紧张关系,以及组织形式的波动,这些形式在政治动荡时期很容易不稳定。& # x0D;& # x0D;
The article discusses features of (dis-)continuity between the three German musicological societies which existed before the foundation of the current “Gesellschaft für Musikforschung” (GfM). When the GfM was founded by Friedrich Blume in 1946/1947, it adopted the name of the first German-language musi- cological society: Robert Eitner’s “Gesellschaft für Musikforschung” (1868–1905). However, it has much more in common with its later predecessors: the “Internationale Musikgesellschaft” (1899–1914) and the “Deutsche Musikgesellschaft” (1918–1939). These societies established precedents for the structure of musicological societies, their congresses and journals. Even the close cooperation with a music publisher was continued by the new GfM, although Blume changed the partner from Breitkopf & Härtel to Bärenreiter. Furthermore, all three societies faced similar challenges: the relationship between musicological research and musical life, the tension between nationalist agendas and international cooperation, and the fluctuating forms of organization, which were easily destabilised in times of political turmoil.