利用环境传感器估算占用率:可能性与局限性

Q1 Engineering
{"title":"利用环境传感器估算占用率:可能性与局限性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Occupancy detection and estimation in buildings paves the way to improve the utilization of lighting and HVAC systems, induce energy savings and enhance the well-being of the occupants. This paper presents a comparative study of state-of-art machine learning techniques that solve two different occupancy monitoring problems using environmental sensor data. One is the regression problem that estimates the actual count of occupants while the other is the classification problem which estimates the level of occupancy (empty, sparse, full). The results of the best performing machine learning techniques that solve both problems for the open dataset from the University of Southern Denmark, Odense are presented to compare the accuracy of both approaches and the ease of implementation. The impact of <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span>, temperature, and humidity features on the occupancy count/levels and detection accuracy (occupied versus unoccupied) are studied. Comprehensive analysis with different combinations of environmental features and other free features such as time-of-day along with different sampling techniques for training and testing are performed to understand how such models can be adapted for actual deployment. Our results indicate detection accuracy between 66% to 82% for different sampling schemes; with day-based sampling showing a better performance while random sampling generically showcasing lower accuracy (66.2%). The occupancy estimation (levels or counts) has accuracy in the range of 69% to 79% for random sampling and 71% to 80% for day-based sampling. Finally, results demonstrate that models based single environmental sensor data streams do not perform as well as the models with sensor fusion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33659,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Built Environment","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 96-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323000831/pdfft?md5=b581cee0e821027ac255c75ec978aca4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666123323000831-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupancy estimation with environmental sensors: The possibilities and limitations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Occupancy detection and estimation in buildings paves the way to improve the utilization of lighting and HVAC systems, induce energy savings and enhance the well-being of the occupants. This paper presents a comparative study of state-of-art machine learning techniques that solve two different occupancy monitoring problems using environmental sensor data. One is the regression problem that estimates the actual count of occupants while the other is the classification problem which estimates the level of occupancy (empty, sparse, full). The results of the best performing machine learning techniques that solve both problems for the open dataset from the University of Southern Denmark, Odense are presented to compare the accuracy of both approaches and the ease of implementation. The impact of <span><math><mrow><mi>C</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></math></span>, temperature, and humidity features on the occupancy count/levels and detection accuracy (occupied versus unoccupied) are studied. Comprehensive analysis with different combinations of environmental features and other free features such as time-of-day along with different sampling techniques for training and testing are performed to understand how such models can be adapted for actual deployment. Our results indicate detection accuracy between 66% to 82% for different sampling schemes; with day-based sampling showing a better performance while random sampling generically showcasing lower accuracy (66.2%). The occupancy estimation (levels or counts) has accuracy in the range of 69% to 79% for random sampling and 71% to 80% for day-based sampling. Finally, results demonstrate that models based single environmental sensor data streams do not perform as well as the models with sensor fusion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 96-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323000831/pdfft?md5=b581cee0e821027ac255c75ec978aca4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666123323000831-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323000831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323000831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑物内的占用率检测和估算为提高照明和暖通空调系统的利用率、节约能源和改善居住者的舒适度铺平了道路。本文对最先进的机器学习技术进行了比较研究,这些技术利用环境传感器数据解决了两种不同的占用监测问题。一个是估计实际占用人数的回归问题,另一个是估计占用水平(空、稀、满)的分类问题。本文介绍了针对南丹麦欧登塞大学开放数据集解决这两个问题的最佳机器学习技术的结果,以比较这两种方法的准确性和实施难易程度。研究了二氧化碳、温度和湿度特征对占用人数/水平和检测精度(占用与未占用)的影响。对环境特征和其他自由特征(如时间-日期)的不同组合以及用于训练和测试的不同采样技术进行了综合分析,以了解如何将这些模型用于实际部署。我们的结果表明,不同采样方案的检测准确率在 66% 到 82% 之间;以天为单位的采样表现较好,而随机采样的准确率一般较低(66.2%)。随机取样的占用率估计(水平或计数)准确率在 69% 至 79% 之间,按日取样的准确率在 71% 至 80% 之间。最后,结果表明,基于单一环境传感器数据流的模型不如传感器融合模型表现出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Occupancy estimation with environmental sensors: The possibilities and limitations

Occupancy estimation with environmental sensors: The possibilities and limitations

Occupancy detection and estimation in buildings paves the way to improve the utilization of lighting and HVAC systems, induce energy savings and enhance the well-being of the occupants. This paper presents a comparative study of state-of-art machine learning techniques that solve two different occupancy monitoring problems using environmental sensor data. One is the regression problem that estimates the actual count of occupants while the other is the classification problem which estimates the level of occupancy (empty, sparse, full). The results of the best performing machine learning techniques that solve both problems for the open dataset from the University of Southern Denmark, Odense are presented to compare the accuracy of both approaches and the ease of implementation. The impact of CO2, temperature, and humidity features on the occupancy count/levels and detection accuracy (occupied versus unoccupied) are studied. Comprehensive analysis with different combinations of environmental features and other free features such as time-of-day along with different sampling techniques for training and testing are performed to understand how such models can be adapted for actual deployment. Our results indicate detection accuracy between 66% to 82% for different sampling schemes; with day-based sampling showing a better performance while random sampling generically showcasing lower accuracy (66.2%). The occupancy estimation (levels or counts) has accuracy in the range of 69% to 79% for random sampling and 71% to 80% for day-based sampling. Finally, results demonstrate that models based single environmental sensor data streams do not perform as well as the models with sensor fusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Built Environment
Energy and Built Environment Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信