COVID-19和流感疫苗接种后静脉血栓栓塞结局的比较

Manila Gaddh, David Scott, Waldemar E. Wysokinski, Robert D. McBane, Ana I Casanegra, Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Damon Houghton
{"title":"COVID-19和流感疫苗接种后静脉血栓栓塞结局的比较","authors":"Manila Gaddh, David Scott, Waldemar E. Wysokinski, Robert D. McBane, Ana I Casanegra, Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Damon Houghton","doi":"10.1055/a-2183-5269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Published data on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with COVID-19 vaccines is scarce and inconclusive, leading to an unmet need for further studies. Methods: Retrospective, multicentered study of adult patients vaccinated for one of the three approved COVID-19 vaccines in the United States of America and a pre-COVID-19 cohort of patients vaccinated for influenza at two institutions: Mayo Clinic Enterprise sites and the Medical College of Wisconsin, looking at rate of VTE over 90 days. VTE was identified by applying validated natural language processing algorithms to relevant imaging studies. Kaplan-Meier Curves were used to evaluate rate of VTE and Cox proportional hazard models for incident VTE after vaccinations. Sensitivity analyses were performed for age, sex, outpatient vs inpatient status and type of COVID-19 vaccine. Results: 911,381 study subjects received COVID-19 vaccine [mean age 56.8 (SD 18.3) years, 55.3% females] and 442,612 received influenza vaccine [mean age 56.5 (SD 18.3) years, 58.7% females]. VTE occurred within 90 days in 1,498 (0.11%) of the total 1,353,993 vaccinations: 882 (0.10%) in the COVID-19 and 616 (0.14%) in the influenza vaccination cohort. After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no difference in VTE event rate after COVID-19 vaccination compared to influenza vaccination [adjusted hazard ratio 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.05)]. No significant difference in VTE rates was observed between the two cohorts on sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: In this large cohort of COVID-19 vaccinated patients, risk of VTE at 90-days was low and no different than a pre-COVID-19 cohort of influenza vaccinated patients.","PeriodicalId":94220,"journal":{"name":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Venous Thromboembolism Outcomes after COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccinations\",\"authors\":\"Manila Gaddh, David Scott, Waldemar E. Wysokinski, Robert D. McBane, Ana I Casanegra, Lisa Baumann Kreuziger, Damon Houghton\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2183-5269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Published data on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with COVID-19 vaccines is scarce and inconclusive, leading to an unmet need for further studies. Methods: Retrospective, multicentered study of adult patients vaccinated for one of the three approved COVID-19 vaccines in the United States of America and a pre-COVID-19 cohort of patients vaccinated for influenza at two institutions: Mayo Clinic Enterprise sites and the Medical College of Wisconsin, looking at rate of VTE over 90 days. VTE was identified by applying validated natural language processing algorithms to relevant imaging studies. Kaplan-Meier Curves were used to evaluate rate of VTE and Cox proportional hazard models for incident VTE after vaccinations. Sensitivity analyses were performed for age, sex, outpatient vs inpatient status and type of COVID-19 vaccine. Results: 911,381 study subjects received COVID-19 vaccine [mean age 56.8 (SD 18.3) years, 55.3% females] and 442,612 received influenza vaccine [mean age 56.5 (SD 18.3) years, 58.7% females]. VTE occurred within 90 days in 1,498 (0.11%) of the total 1,353,993 vaccinations: 882 (0.10%) in the COVID-19 and 616 (0.14%) in the influenza vaccination cohort. After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no difference in VTE event rate after COVID-19 vaccination compared to influenza vaccination [adjusted hazard ratio 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.05)]. No significant difference in VTE rates was observed between the two cohorts on sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: In this large cohort of COVID-19 vaccinated patients, risk of VTE at 90-days was low and no different than a pre-COVID-19 cohort of influenza vaccinated patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2183-5269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2183-5269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于COVID-19疫苗静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险的已发表数据很少且不确定,导致进一步研究的需求未得到满足。方法:回顾性、多中心研究,在美国接种了三种已批准的COVID-19疫苗之一的成年患者,以及在梅奥企业诊所和威斯康星医学院两家机构接种了COVID-19前流感疫苗的患者队列,观察90天内静脉血栓栓塞的发生率。通过将经过验证的自然语言处理算法应用于相关成像研究来识别VTE。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线评价接种后VTE发生率,采用Cox比例风险模型评价接种后VTE发生率。对年龄、性别、门诊与住院情况以及COVID-19疫苗类型进行敏感性分析。结果:共有911,381名研究对象接种了COVID-19疫苗[平均年龄56.8 (SD 18.3)岁,女性占55.3%],442,612名研究对象接种了流感疫苗[平均年龄56.5 (SD 18.3)岁,女性占58.7%]。在13353993例疫苗接种中,1498例(0.11%)在90天内发生静脉血栓栓塞,其中882例(0.10%)发生在COVID-19疫苗接种组,616例(0.14%)发生在流感疫苗接种组。校正混杂变量后,COVID-19疫苗接种后VTE事件发生率与流感疫苗接种后无差异[校正风险比0.95(95%可信区间0.85-1.05)]。在敏感性分析中,没有观察到两个队列之间VTE发生率的显著差异。结论:在这个COVID-19疫苗接种患者的大型队列中,90天静脉血栓栓塞的风险较低,与COVID-19前流感疫苗接种患者队列没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Venous Thromboembolism Outcomes after COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccinations
Background: Published data on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with COVID-19 vaccines is scarce and inconclusive, leading to an unmet need for further studies. Methods: Retrospective, multicentered study of adult patients vaccinated for one of the three approved COVID-19 vaccines in the United States of America and a pre-COVID-19 cohort of patients vaccinated for influenza at two institutions: Mayo Clinic Enterprise sites and the Medical College of Wisconsin, looking at rate of VTE over 90 days. VTE was identified by applying validated natural language processing algorithms to relevant imaging studies. Kaplan-Meier Curves were used to evaluate rate of VTE and Cox proportional hazard models for incident VTE after vaccinations. Sensitivity analyses were performed for age, sex, outpatient vs inpatient status and type of COVID-19 vaccine. Results: 911,381 study subjects received COVID-19 vaccine [mean age 56.8 (SD 18.3) years, 55.3% females] and 442,612 received influenza vaccine [mean age 56.5 (SD 18.3) years, 58.7% females]. VTE occurred within 90 days in 1,498 (0.11%) of the total 1,353,993 vaccinations: 882 (0.10%) in the COVID-19 and 616 (0.14%) in the influenza vaccination cohort. After adjusting for confounding variables, there was no difference in VTE event rate after COVID-19 vaccination compared to influenza vaccination [adjusted hazard ratio 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.85-1.05)]. No significant difference in VTE rates was observed between the two cohorts on sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: In this large cohort of COVID-19 vaccinated patients, risk of VTE at 90-days was low and no different than a pre-COVID-19 cohort of influenza vaccinated patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信