在引入专业法规后,对澳大利亚护理人员的看法和经验的探索

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Buck Reed, Leanne Cowin, Peter O'Meara, Christine Metusela, Ian Wilson
{"title":"在引入专业法规后,对澳大利亚护理人员的看法和经验的探索","authors":"Buck Reed, Leanne Cowin, Peter O'Meara, Christine Metusela, Ian Wilson","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-02-2023-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Since 2018, Australian paramedics have been regulated under the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (NRAS) for health practitioners. Established professions have been regulated in Australia for some time, so there is limited knowledge of their entry to regulation. However, as paramedicine has not been previously centrally regulated, this provides a unique case study to explore the transition to regulated practice. Design/methodology/approach Australian paramedics undertook two surveys: pre- and post-introduction of registration. The first survey was in the month leading up to the commencement of registration ( N = 419), and the second survey took place 31 months after registration ( N = 407). This paper presents the results of statistical analyses of the post-registration survey including comparisons to the pre-registration survey. Findings Although support for regulation has increased over time, there remains strong dissent consistent with 2018 levels. After 31 months of regulation, respondents reported increasing knowledge of the scheme and greater ease of navigation. The impacts of regulation are more nuanced and less polarised than in the first survey. Identity is again canvassed, and results suggest a shift from employment status and qualifications as key elements of identity to a community of practice and registration. Originality/value Paramedics' experiences and understanding of the rationale for registration are developing. Further support is needed to assist with the emerging professional identity and behaviours. Regulation is one of many occupational factors influencing professional identity and professionalism. Exploring the experience of regulation potentially assists regulators in better supporting practitioners and helps better understand professional evolution.","PeriodicalId":42859,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Governance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploration of perceptions and experiences of Australian paramedics following the introduction of professional regulation\",\"authors\":\"Buck Reed, Leanne Cowin, Peter O'Meara, Christine Metusela, Ian Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijhg-02-2023-0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Since 2018, Australian paramedics have been regulated under the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (NRAS) for health practitioners. Established professions have been regulated in Australia for some time, so there is limited knowledge of their entry to regulation. However, as paramedicine has not been previously centrally regulated, this provides a unique case study to explore the transition to regulated practice. Design/methodology/approach Australian paramedics undertook two surveys: pre- and post-introduction of registration. The first survey was in the month leading up to the commencement of registration ( N = 419), and the second survey took place 31 months after registration ( N = 407). This paper presents the results of statistical analyses of the post-registration survey including comparisons to the pre-registration survey. Findings Although support for regulation has increased over time, there remains strong dissent consistent with 2018 levels. After 31 months of regulation, respondents reported increasing knowledge of the scheme and greater ease of navigation. The impacts of regulation are more nuanced and less polarised than in the first survey. Identity is again canvassed, and results suggest a shift from employment status and qualifications as key elements of identity to a community of practice and registration. Originality/value Paramedics' experiences and understanding of the rationale for registration are developing. Further support is needed to assist with the emerging professional identity and behaviours. Regulation is one of many occupational factors influencing professional identity and professionalism. Exploring the experience of regulation potentially assists regulators in better supporting practitioners and helps better understand professional evolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Governance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-02-2023-0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijhg-02-2023-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自2018年以来,澳大利亚护理人员受到卫生从业人员国家注册和认证计划(NRAS)的监管。在澳大利亚,成熟的专业已经被监管了一段时间,所以对他们进入监管的了解有限。然而,由于辅助医疗以前没有受到中央监管,这为探索向监管实践的过渡提供了一个独特的案例研究。设计/方法/方法澳大利亚护理人员进行了两项调查:注册前和注册后。第一次调查是在注册开始前一个月进行的(N = 419),第二次调查是在注册后31个月进行的(N = 407)。本文介绍了注册后调查的统计分析结果,包括与注册前调查的比较。尽管随着时间的推移,对监管的支持有所增加,但仍存在与2018年水平一致的强烈反对意见。经过31个月的监管,受访者表示对该计划的了解有所增加,并且更容易导航。与第一次调查相比,监管的影响更加微妙,两极分化程度也更低。身份再次被审视,结果表明,从就业状况和资格作为身份的关键因素,到实践和注册社区的转变。独创性/价值护理人员的经验和对注册基本原理的理解正在发展。需要进一步的支持来协助新出现的专业身份和行为。规范是影响职业认同和职业精神的诸多职业因素之一。探索监管经验可能有助于监管机构更好地支持从业者,并有助于更好地理解专业发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An exploration of perceptions and experiences of Australian paramedics following the introduction of professional regulation
Purpose Since 2018, Australian paramedics have been regulated under the National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (NRAS) for health practitioners. Established professions have been regulated in Australia for some time, so there is limited knowledge of their entry to regulation. However, as paramedicine has not been previously centrally regulated, this provides a unique case study to explore the transition to regulated practice. Design/methodology/approach Australian paramedics undertook two surveys: pre- and post-introduction of registration. The first survey was in the month leading up to the commencement of registration ( N = 419), and the second survey took place 31 months after registration ( N = 407). This paper presents the results of statistical analyses of the post-registration survey including comparisons to the pre-registration survey. Findings Although support for regulation has increased over time, there remains strong dissent consistent with 2018 levels. After 31 months of regulation, respondents reported increasing knowledge of the scheme and greater ease of navigation. The impacts of regulation are more nuanced and less polarised than in the first survey. Identity is again canvassed, and results suggest a shift from employment status and qualifications as key elements of identity to a community of practice and registration. Originality/value Paramedics' experiences and understanding of the rationale for registration are developing. Further support is needed to assist with the emerging professional identity and behaviours. Regulation is one of many occupational factors influencing professional identity and professionalism. Exploring the experience of regulation potentially assists regulators in better supporting practitioners and helps better understand professional evolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Governance
International Journal of Health Governance HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: International Journal of Health Governance (IJHG) is oriented to serve those at the policy and governance levels within government, healthcare systems or healthcare organizations. It bridges the academic, public and private sectors, presenting case studies, research papers, reviews and viewpoints to provide an understanding of health governance that is both practical and actionable for practitioners, managers and policy makers. Policy and governance to promote, maintain or restore health extends beyond the clinical care aspect alone.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信