儿科医学生多项选择评估项目特征与统计表现之间的关系

Isabelle Bosi, Deborah O'Mara, Tyler Clark, Nounu Sarukkali Patabendige, Sean E. Kennedy, Hasantha Gunasekera
{"title":"儿科医学生多项选择评估项目特征与统计表现之间的关系","authors":"Isabelle Bosi, Deborah O'Mara, Tyler Clark, Nounu Sarukkali Patabendige, Sean E. Kennedy, Hasantha Gunasekera","doi":"10.12688/mep.19764.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<ns4:p><ns4:bold>Background:</ns4:bold> Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are commonly used in medical student assessments but often prepared by clinicians without formal education qualifications. This study aimed to inform the question writing process by investigating the association between MCQ characteristics and commonly used statistical measures of individual item quality for a paediatric medical term.</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods:</ns4:bold> Item characteristics and statistics for five consecutive annual barrier paediatric medical student assessments (each n=60 items) were examined retrospectively. Items were characterised according to format (single best answer vs. extended matching); stem and option length; vignette presence and whether required to answer the question, inclusion of images/tables; clinical skill assessed; paediatric speciality; clinical relevance/applicability; Bloom’s taxonomy domain and item flaws. For each item, we recorded the facility (proportion of students answering correctly) and point biserial (discrimination).</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results:</ns4:bold> Item characteristics significantly positively correlated (p<0.05) with facility were relevant vignette, diagnosis or application items, longer stem length and higher clinical relevance. Recall items (e.g., epidemiology items) were associated with lower facility. Characteristics significantly correlated with higher discrimination were extended matching question (EMQ) format, longer options, diagnostic and subspeciality items. Variation in item characteristics did not predict variation in the facility or point biserial (less than 10% variation explained).</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions:</ns4:bold> Our research supports the use of longer items, relevant vignettes, clinically-relevant content, EMQs and diagnostic items for optimising paediatric MCQ assessment quality. Variation in item characteristics explains a small amount of the observed variation in statistical measures of MCQ quality, highlighting the importance of clinical expertise in writing high quality assessments.</ns4:p>","PeriodicalId":74136,"journal":{"name":"MedEdPublish (2016)","volume":"71 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between item characteristics and statistical performance for paediatric medical student multiple choice assessments\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Bosi, Deborah O'Mara, Tyler Clark, Nounu Sarukkali Patabendige, Sean E. Kennedy, Hasantha Gunasekera\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/mep.19764.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<ns4:p><ns4:bold>Background:</ns4:bold> Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are commonly used in medical student assessments but often prepared by clinicians without formal education qualifications. This study aimed to inform the question writing process by investigating the association between MCQ characteristics and commonly used statistical measures of individual item quality for a paediatric medical term.</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Methods:</ns4:bold> Item characteristics and statistics for five consecutive annual barrier paediatric medical student assessments (each n=60 items) were examined retrospectively. Items were characterised according to format (single best answer vs. extended matching); stem and option length; vignette presence and whether required to answer the question, inclusion of images/tables; clinical skill assessed; paediatric speciality; clinical relevance/applicability; Bloom’s taxonomy domain and item flaws. For each item, we recorded the facility (proportion of students answering correctly) and point biserial (discrimination).</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Results:</ns4:bold> Item characteristics significantly positively correlated (p<0.05) with facility were relevant vignette, diagnosis or application items, longer stem length and higher clinical relevance. Recall items (e.g., epidemiology items) were associated with lower facility. Characteristics significantly correlated with higher discrimination were extended matching question (EMQ) format, longer options, diagnostic and subspeciality items. Variation in item characteristics did not predict variation in the facility or point biserial (less than 10% variation explained).</ns4:p><ns4:p> <ns4:bold>Conclusions:</ns4:bold> Our research supports the use of longer items, relevant vignettes, clinically-relevant content, EMQs and diagnostic items for optimising paediatric MCQ assessment quality. Variation in item characteristics explains a small amount of the observed variation in statistical measures of MCQ quality, highlighting the importance of clinical expertise in writing high quality assessments.</ns4:p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"volume\":\"71 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedEdPublish (2016)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19764.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedEdPublish (2016)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/mep.19764.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多项选择题(mcq)通常用于医学生评估,但通常由没有正规教育资格的临床医生编写。本研究旨在通过调查MCQ特征与常用的儿科医学术语单项质量统计指标之间的关系,为问题写作过程提供信息。方法:回顾性分析连续5次年度障碍性儿科医学生评估(每次60项)的项目特征和统计数据。根据格式(单一最佳答案vs.扩展匹配)对项目进行表征;阀杆和选件长度;插图的存在和是否需要回答问题,包括图像/表格;临床技能评估;儿科专业;临床意义/适用性;Bloom的分类领域和项目缺陷。对于每个项目,我们记录了设施(正确回答的学生比例)和点双列(歧视)。结果:项目特征与设施显著正相关(p<0.05)的是相关的小插图、诊断或应用项目、较长的茎长和较高的临床相关性。召回项目(如流行病学项目)与较低的设施相关。与高歧视显著相关的特征是扩展匹配问题(EMQ)格式、较长的选项、诊断和亚专业项目。项目特征的变化不能预测设施或点双序列的变化(少于10%的变化被解释)。结论:我们的研究支持使用较长的项目、相关的小插曲、临床相关的内容、emq和诊断项目来优化儿科MCQ的评估质量。项目特征的变化解释了MCQ质量统计测量中观察到的少量变化,突出了临床专业知识在编写高质量评估中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between item characteristics and statistical performance for paediatric medical student multiple choice assessments
Background: Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are commonly used in medical student assessments but often prepared by clinicians without formal education qualifications. This study aimed to inform the question writing process by investigating the association between MCQ characteristics and commonly used statistical measures of individual item quality for a paediatric medical term. Methods: Item characteristics and statistics for five consecutive annual barrier paediatric medical student assessments (each n=60 items) were examined retrospectively. Items were characterised according to format (single best answer vs. extended matching); stem and option length; vignette presence and whether required to answer the question, inclusion of images/tables; clinical skill assessed; paediatric speciality; clinical relevance/applicability; Bloom’s taxonomy domain and item flaws. For each item, we recorded the facility (proportion of students answering correctly) and point biserial (discrimination). Results: Item characteristics significantly positively correlated (p<0.05) with facility were relevant vignette, diagnosis or application items, longer stem length and higher clinical relevance. Recall items (e.g., epidemiology items) were associated with lower facility. Characteristics significantly correlated with higher discrimination were extended matching question (EMQ) format, longer options, diagnostic and subspeciality items. Variation in item characteristics did not predict variation in the facility or point biserial (less than 10% variation explained). Conclusions: Our research supports the use of longer items, relevant vignettes, clinically-relevant content, EMQs and diagnostic items for optimising paediatric MCQ assessment quality. Variation in item characteristics explains a small amount of the observed variation in statistical measures of MCQ quality, highlighting the importance of clinical expertise in writing high quality assessments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信