支持读者从不同来源自动获取事件的完整汇总信息的系统

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Algorithms Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.3390/a16110513
Pietro Dell’Oglio, Alessandro Bondielli, Francesco Marcelloni
{"title":"支持读者从不同来源自动获取事件的完整汇总信息的系统","authors":"Pietro Dell’Oglio, Alessandro Bondielli, Francesco Marcelloni","doi":"10.3390/a16110513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, most newspapers utilize social media to disseminate news. On the one hand, this results in an overload of related articles for social media users. On the other hand, since social media tends to form echo chambers around their users, different opinions and information may be hidden. Enabling users to access different information (possibly outside of their echo chambers, without the burden of reading entire articles, often containing redundant information) may be a step forward in allowing them to form their own opinions. To address this challenge, we propose a system that integrates Transformer neural models and text summarization models along with decision rules. Given a reference article already read by the user, our system first collects articles related to the same topic from a configurable number of different sources. Then, it identifies and summarizes the information that differs from the reference article and outputs the summary to the user. The core of the system is the sentence classification algorithm, which classifies sentences in the collected articles into three classes based on similarity with the reference article: sentences classified as dissimilar are summarized by using a pre-trained abstractive summarization model. We evaluated the proposed system in two steps. First, we assessed its effectiveness in identifying content differences between the reference article and the related articles by using human judgments obtained through crowdsourcing as ground truth. We obtained an average F1 score of 0.772 against average F1 scores of 0.797 and 0.676 achieved by two state-of-the-art approaches based, respectively, on model tuning and prompt tuning, which require an appropriate tuning phase and, therefore, greater computational effort. Second, we asked a sample of people to evaluate how well the summary generated by the system represents the information that is not present in the article read by the user. The results are extremely encouraging. Finally, we present a use case.","PeriodicalId":7636,"journal":{"name":"Algorithms","volume":"106 s415","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A System to Support Readers in Automatically Acquiring Complete Summarized Information on an Event from Different Sources\",\"authors\":\"Pietro Dell’Oglio, Alessandro Bondielli, Francesco Marcelloni\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/a16110513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, most newspapers utilize social media to disseminate news. On the one hand, this results in an overload of related articles for social media users. On the other hand, since social media tends to form echo chambers around their users, different opinions and information may be hidden. Enabling users to access different information (possibly outside of their echo chambers, without the burden of reading entire articles, often containing redundant information) may be a step forward in allowing them to form their own opinions. To address this challenge, we propose a system that integrates Transformer neural models and text summarization models along with decision rules. Given a reference article already read by the user, our system first collects articles related to the same topic from a configurable number of different sources. Then, it identifies and summarizes the information that differs from the reference article and outputs the summary to the user. The core of the system is the sentence classification algorithm, which classifies sentences in the collected articles into three classes based on similarity with the reference article: sentences classified as dissimilar are summarized by using a pre-trained abstractive summarization model. We evaluated the proposed system in two steps. First, we assessed its effectiveness in identifying content differences between the reference article and the related articles by using human judgments obtained through crowdsourcing as ground truth. We obtained an average F1 score of 0.772 against average F1 scores of 0.797 and 0.676 achieved by two state-of-the-art approaches based, respectively, on model tuning and prompt tuning, which require an appropriate tuning phase and, therefore, greater computational effort. Second, we asked a sample of people to evaluate how well the summary generated by the system represents the information that is not present in the article read by the user. The results are extremely encouraging. Finally, we present a use case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algorithms\",\"volume\":\"106 s415\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algorithms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/a16110513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/a16110513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

今天,大多数报纸利用社交媒体传播新闻。一方面,这导致社交媒体用户的相关文章过载。另一方面,由于社交媒体倾向于在用户周围形成回音室,不同的意见和信息可能会被隐藏。允许用户访问不同的信息(可能在他们的回音室之外,没有阅读整篇文章的负担,通常包含冗余信息)可能是允许他们形成自己观点的一步。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一个集成Transformer神经模型和文本摘要模型以及决策规则的系统。给定用户已经阅读的参考文章,我们的系统首先从可配置数量的不同来源收集与同一主题相关的文章。然后,它识别和总结与参考文章不同的信息,并将摘要输出给用户。该系统的核心是句子分类算法,该算法根据与参考文章的相似度将收集到的文章中的句子分为三类:分类为不相似的句子通过预训练的抽象摘要模型进行汇总。我们分两步评估了提议的系统。首先,我们评估了它在识别参考文章和相关文章之间的内容差异方面的有效性,通过使用通过众包获得的人类判断作为基础事实。我们获得了0.772的平均F1分数,而分别基于模型调优和提示调优的两种最先进的方法获得的平均F1分数分别为0.797和0.676,这两种方法需要适当的调优阶段,因此需要更多的计算工作量。其次,我们要求一些人评估系统生成的摘要如何很好地代表用户阅读的文章中没有出现的信息。结果非常令人鼓舞。最后,我们给出一个用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A System to Support Readers in Automatically Acquiring Complete Summarized Information on an Event from Different Sources
Today, most newspapers utilize social media to disseminate news. On the one hand, this results in an overload of related articles for social media users. On the other hand, since social media tends to form echo chambers around their users, different opinions and information may be hidden. Enabling users to access different information (possibly outside of their echo chambers, without the burden of reading entire articles, often containing redundant information) may be a step forward in allowing them to form their own opinions. To address this challenge, we propose a system that integrates Transformer neural models and text summarization models along with decision rules. Given a reference article already read by the user, our system first collects articles related to the same topic from a configurable number of different sources. Then, it identifies and summarizes the information that differs from the reference article and outputs the summary to the user. The core of the system is the sentence classification algorithm, which classifies sentences in the collected articles into three classes based on similarity with the reference article: sentences classified as dissimilar are summarized by using a pre-trained abstractive summarization model. We evaluated the proposed system in two steps. First, we assessed its effectiveness in identifying content differences between the reference article and the related articles by using human judgments obtained through crowdsourcing as ground truth. We obtained an average F1 score of 0.772 against average F1 scores of 0.797 and 0.676 achieved by two state-of-the-art approaches based, respectively, on model tuning and prompt tuning, which require an appropriate tuning phase and, therefore, greater computational effort. Second, we asked a sample of people to evaluate how well the summary generated by the system represents the information that is not present in the article read by the user. The results are extremely encouraging. Finally, we present a use case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Algorithms
Algorithms Mathematics-Numerical Analysis
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
394
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信