美国军火和工业在不断变化的国际秩序中的地位

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Rosella Cappella Zielinski, Frank Finelli, Samuel Gerstle, Isak Kulalic, Mark Wilson
{"title":"美国军火和工业在不断变化的国际秩序中的地位","authors":"Rosella Cappella Zielinski, Frank Finelli, Samuel Gerstle, Isak Kulalic, Mark Wilson","doi":"10.1080/14702436.2023.2279624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTUnited States support for Ukraine and preparation for a potential, likely protracted, conflict with China has drawn attention to the fragility of the U.S. defense industrial base. Since the end of the Cold War, the American defense industry has optimized for peacetime and low-attrition conflicts, prized efficiency and cost-savings over capacity and flexibility, and incentivized short-run returns over resilience and innovation. While this design may have made sense in a period of undisputed U.S. dominance, the rise of the People’s Republic of China as a peer competitor and the emerging demand that the U.S. deter and, if necessary, win one or more protracted conflicts requires that Washington take a more intentional and direct role in shaping the capability, capacity, and resilience of the U.S. defense industrial base.KEYWORDS: Defense industryAmerican defense industrial basepowergreat power competition Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsRosella Cappella ZielinskiRosella Cappella Zielinski is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Political Economy Working Group at Boston University, and Non-Resident Fellow at the Krulak Center for Innovation & Future Warfare at Marine Corps University.Frank FinelliFrank Finelli is managing director at the Carlyle Group, focusing on investments in the defense and aerospace sector, where he has led numerous acquisitions and developed Carlyle’s cross-portfolio value creation and risk reductionSamuel GerstleSamuel Gerstle is a PhD student at Boston University. He previously worked at The Asia Group and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He holds a Master of Science in Foreign Service from Georgetown University.Isak KulalicIsak Kulaic is a recent MA graduate in International Affairs from Boston University. His research revolves around post conflict development in the Western Balkans and regional European and North Atlantic integration.Mark WilsonMark Wilson is a Professor of History at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. He is also an Andrew Carnegie Fellow for his work on the American military-industrial complex from the 1950s to the early 21st century.","PeriodicalId":35155,"journal":{"name":"Defence Studies","volume":"128 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"American arms and industry in a changing international order\",\"authors\":\"Rosella Cappella Zielinski, Frank Finelli, Samuel Gerstle, Isak Kulalic, Mark Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14702436.2023.2279624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTUnited States support for Ukraine and preparation for a potential, likely protracted, conflict with China has drawn attention to the fragility of the U.S. defense industrial base. Since the end of the Cold War, the American defense industry has optimized for peacetime and low-attrition conflicts, prized efficiency and cost-savings over capacity and flexibility, and incentivized short-run returns over resilience and innovation. While this design may have made sense in a period of undisputed U.S. dominance, the rise of the People’s Republic of China as a peer competitor and the emerging demand that the U.S. deter and, if necessary, win one or more protracted conflicts requires that Washington take a more intentional and direct role in shaping the capability, capacity, and resilience of the U.S. defense industrial base.KEYWORDS: Defense industryAmerican defense industrial basepowergreat power competition Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsRosella Cappella ZielinskiRosella Cappella Zielinski is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Political Economy Working Group at Boston University, and Non-Resident Fellow at the Krulak Center for Innovation & Future Warfare at Marine Corps University.Frank FinelliFrank Finelli is managing director at the Carlyle Group, focusing on investments in the defense and aerospace sector, where he has led numerous acquisitions and developed Carlyle’s cross-portfolio value creation and risk reductionSamuel GerstleSamuel Gerstle is a PhD student at Boston University. He previously worked at The Asia Group and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He holds a Master of Science in Foreign Service from Georgetown University.Isak KulalicIsak Kulaic is a recent MA graduate in International Affairs from Boston University. His research revolves around post conflict development in the Western Balkans and regional European and North Atlantic integration.Mark WilsonMark Wilson is a Professor of History at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. He is also an Andrew Carnegie Fellow for his work on the American military-industrial complex from the 1950s to the early 21st century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Defence Studies\",\"volume\":\"128 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Defence Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2023.2279624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2023.2279624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

【摘要】美国对乌克兰的支持,以及为与中国可能旷日持久的冲突做准备,让人们注意到美国国防工业基础的脆弱性。自冷战结束以来,美国国防工业为和平时期和低消耗冲突进行了优化,重视效率和成本节约,而不是能力和灵活性,并鼓励短期回报而不是弹性和创新。虽然这种设计在美国无可争议的主导地位时期可能是有意义的,但中国作为一个同等竞争对手的崛起,以及美国遏制并在必要时赢得一场或多场旷日持久的冲突的新需求,要求华盛顿在塑造美国国防工业基础的能力、能力和弹性方面发挥更有意和直接的作用。关键词:国防工业美国国防工业基础大国竞争披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。作者简介:rosella Cappella Zielinski,波士顿大学政治学副教授,政治经济工作组联合主任,海军陆战队大学Krulak创新与未来战争中心非常驻研究员。本文作者是凯雷投资集团(Carlyle Group)董事总经理,专注于国防和航空航天领域的投资。在该领域,他领导了多次收购,并开发了凯雷的跨投资组合价值创造和风险降低策略。他曾在亚洲集团和战略与国际研究中心工作。他拥有乔治城大学外交服务理学硕士学位。Isak Kulaic是波士顿大学国际事务硕士研究生。他的研究主要围绕西巴尔干冲突后的发展以及欧洲和北大西洋地区的一体化。马克·威尔逊(Mark Wilson)是北卡罗来纳大学夏洛特分校的历史学教授。他也是安德鲁·卡内基研究员,因为他在20世纪50年代到21世纪初的美国军工复合体方面的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
American arms and industry in a changing international order
ABSTRACTUnited States support for Ukraine and preparation for a potential, likely protracted, conflict with China has drawn attention to the fragility of the U.S. defense industrial base. Since the end of the Cold War, the American defense industry has optimized for peacetime and low-attrition conflicts, prized efficiency and cost-savings over capacity and flexibility, and incentivized short-run returns over resilience and innovation. While this design may have made sense in a period of undisputed U.S. dominance, the rise of the People’s Republic of China as a peer competitor and the emerging demand that the U.S. deter and, if necessary, win one or more protracted conflicts requires that Washington take a more intentional and direct role in shaping the capability, capacity, and resilience of the U.S. defense industrial base.KEYWORDS: Defense industryAmerican defense industrial basepowergreat power competition Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsRosella Cappella ZielinskiRosella Cappella Zielinski is an Associate Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Political Economy Working Group at Boston University, and Non-Resident Fellow at the Krulak Center for Innovation & Future Warfare at Marine Corps University.Frank FinelliFrank Finelli is managing director at the Carlyle Group, focusing on investments in the defense and aerospace sector, where he has led numerous acquisitions and developed Carlyle’s cross-portfolio value creation and risk reductionSamuel GerstleSamuel Gerstle is a PhD student at Boston University. He previously worked at The Asia Group and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He holds a Master of Science in Foreign Service from Georgetown University.Isak KulalicIsak Kulaic is a recent MA graduate in International Affairs from Boston University. His research revolves around post conflict development in the Western Balkans and regional European and North Atlantic integration.Mark WilsonMark Wilson is a Professor of History at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte. He is also an Andrew Carnegie Fellow for his work on the American military-industrial complex from the 1950s to the early 21st century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Defence Studies
Defence Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信