根据欧洲规范使用表格值设计的混凝土板在自然火灾下的可靠性量化

IF 0.9 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Marcus Achenbach, Guido Morgenthal
{"title":"根据欧洲规范使用表格值设计的混凝土板在自然火灾下的可靠性量化","authors":"Marcus Achenbach, Guido Morgenthal","doi":"10.1108/jsfe-06-2023-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The design check regarding the fire resistance of concrete slabs can be easily performed using tabulated values. These tables are based on experimental results, but the level of safety, which is obtained by this approach, is not known. On the other hand, performance-based methods are more accepted, but require a target reliability as performance criterion. Hence, there is a need for calibration of the performance-based methods using the results of the “traditional” descriptive approach. Design/methodology/approach The calibration is performed for a single span concrete slab, where the axis distance of the reinforcement is chosen according to Eurocode 2 for a defined fire rating. A “standard” compartment is selected to cover typical fields of application. The opening factor is considered as parameter to obtain the maximum peak temperatures in the compartment. A Monte Carlo simulation, in combination with a response surface method, is set up to calculate the probabilities of failure. Findings The results indicate that the calculated reliability index for a standard is within the range, which has been used for the derivation of safety and combination factors in the Eurocodes. It can be observed that members designed for a fire rating R90 have a significant increase in the structural safety for natural fires compared to a design for a fire rating R30. Originality/value The level of safety, which is obtained by a design based on tabulated values, is quantified for concrete slabs. The results are a necessary input for the calibration of performance-based methods and could stimulate discussions among scientists and building authorities.","PeriodicalId":45033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of the reliability of concrete slabs subjected to natural fires designed using tabulated values according to Eurocodes\",\"authors\":\"Marcus Achenbach, Guido Morgenthal\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsfe-06-2023-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The design check regarding the fire resistance of concrete slabs can be easily performed using tabulated values. These tables are based on experimental results, but the level of safety, which is obtained by this approach, is not known. On the other hand, performance-based methods are more accepted, but require a target reliability as performance criterion. Hence, there is a need for calibration of the performance-based methods using the results of the “traditional” descriptive approach. Design/methodology/approach The calibration is performed for a single span concrete slab, where the axis distance of the reinforcement is chosen according to Eurocode 2 for a defined fire rating. A “standard” compartment is selected to cover typical fields of application. The opening factor is considered as parameter to obtain the maximum peak temperatures in the compartment. A Monte Carlo simulation, in combination with a response surface method, is set up to calculate the probabilities of failure. Findings The results indicate that the calculated reliability index for a standard is within the range, which has been used for the derivation of safety and combination factors in the Eurocodes. It can be observed that members designed for a fire rating R90 have a significant increase in the structural safety for natural fires compared to a design for a fire rating R30. Originality/value The level of safety, which is obtained by a design based on tabulated values, is quantified for concrete slabs. The results are a necessary input for the calibration of performance-based methods and could stimulate discussions among scientists and building authorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsfe-06-2023-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Fire Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsfe-06-2023-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的混凝土板的防火性设计校核可以使用表格式数值进行。这些表格是基于实验结果,但通过这种方法获得的安全水平尚不清楚。另一方面,基于性能的方法更被接受,但需要目标可靠性作为性能标准。因此,有必要使用“传统”描述性方法的结果对基于绩效的方法进行校准。设计/方法/方法对单跨混凝土板进行校准,其中钢筋的轴线距离根据欧洲规范2的定义防火等级选择。选择一个“标准”隔间来覆盖典型的应用领域。以开度因子为参数,得到舱内最大峰值温度。建立了蒙特卡罗模拟,并结合响应面法计算了失效概率。结果表明,计算得到的可靠度指标在一定范围内,可用于欧洲规范中安全系数和组合系数的推导。可以观察到,与防火等级R30设计相比,防火等级R90设计的构件在自然火灾中的结构安全性显著提高。原创性/价值安全水平是由基于表格值的设计获得的,对混凝土板进行量化。这些结果是校准基于性能的方法的必要输入,并且可以激发科学家和建筑当局之间的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantification of the reliability of concrete slabs subjected to natural fires designed using tabulated values according to Eurocodes
Purpose The design check regarding the fire resistance of concrete slabs can be easily performed using tabulated values. These tables are based on experimental results, but the level of safety, which is obtained by this approach, is not known. On the other hand, performance-based methods are more accepted, but require a target reliability as performance criterion. Hence, there is a need for calibration of the performance-based methods using the results of the “traditional” descriptive approach. Design/methodology/approach The calibration is performed for a single span concrete slab, where the axis distance of the reinforcement is chosen according to Eurocode 2 for a defined fire rating. A “standard” compartment is selected to cover typical fields of application. The opening factor is considered as parameter to obtain the maximum peak temperatures in the compartment. A Monte Carlo simulation, in combination with a response surface method, is set up to calculate the probabilities of failure. Findings The results indicate that the calculated reliability index for a standard is within the range, which has been used for the derivation of safety and combination factors in the Eurocodes. It can be observed that members designed for a fire rating R90 have a significant increase in the structural safety for natural fires compared to a design for a fire rating R30. Originality/value The level of safety, which is obtained by a design based on tabulated values, is quantified for concrete slabs. The results are a necessary input for the calibration of performance-based methods and could stimulate discussions among scientists and building authorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Fire Engineering
Journal of Structural Fire Engineering CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信