重建与修复:对前交叉韧带破裂处理的最新趋势和争议的回顾

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Gabriel I. Onor, William L. Johns, Neel Patel, Sean Wilson, Ralph Cook, Michael C. Ciccotti, Christopher C. Dodson
{"title":"重建与修复:对前交叉韧带破裂处理的最新趋势和争议的回顾","authors":"Gabriel I. Onor, William L. Johns, Neel Patel, Sean Wilson, Ralph Cook, Michael C. Ciccotti, Christopher C. Dodson","doi":"10.1097/bco.0000000000001239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has become increasingly popular in recent years as an option for management of ACL rupture. Though arthroscopic reconstruction has long been the gold standard, there may be a role for repair in appropriately selected patient populations and tear patterns. Recent industry-driven advances in techniques and available instrumentation for ACL repair have regenerated interest. Proponents of ACL repair highlight the maintenance of native tissues allowing for retained proprioception, lack of need for graft usage or harvest, and the potential for accelerated rehabilitation postoperatively as compared to ACL reconstruction. Short-term and early mid-term ACL repair studies have demonstrated encouraging results; however, the authors remain in favor of ACL reconstruction at this time given a dearth of long-term outcomes following ACL repair.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":" 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstruction vs. repair: a review of recent trends and controversies for management of ACL rupture\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel I. Onor, William L. Johns, Neel Patel, Sean Wilson, Ralph Cook, Michael C. Ciccotti, Christopher C. Dodson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/bco.0000000000001239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has become increasingly popular in recent years as an option for management of ACL rupture. Though arthroscopic reconstruction has long been the gold standard, there may be a role for repair in appropriately selected patient populations and tear patterns. Recent industry-driven advances in techniques and available instrumentation for ACL repair have regenerated interest. Proponents of ACL repair highlight the maintenance of native tissues allowing for retained proprioception, lack of need for graft usage or harvest, and the potential for accelerated rehabilitation postoperatively as compared to ACL reconstruction. Short-term and early mid-term ACL repair studies have demonstrated encouraging results; however, the authors remain in favor of ACL reconstruction at this time given a dearth of long-term outcomes following ACL repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\" 23\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001239\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前交叉韧带(ACL)修复近年来越来越流行,作为处理ACL断裂的一种选择。虽然关节镜重建长期以来一直是金标准,但在适当选择的患者群体和撕裂模式中,可能会有修复的作用。最近工业驱动的技术进步和可用的前交叉韧带修复仪器重新引起了人们的兴趣。前交叉韧带修复的支持者强调维持原生组织,保留本体感觉,不需要移植物的使用或收获,以及与前交叉韧带重建相比,术后加速康复的潜力。短期和中期前交叉韧带修复研究显示了令人鼓舞的结果;然而,由于缺乏ACL修复后的长期结果,作者仍然支持ACL重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstruction vs. repair: a review of recent trends and controversies for management of ACL rupture
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair has become increasingly popular in recent years as an option for management of ACL rupture. Though arthroscopic reconstruction has long been the gold standard, there may be a role for repair in appropriately selected patient populations and tear patterns. Recent industry-driven advances in techniques and available instrumentation for ACL repair have regenerated interest. Proponents of ACL repair highlight the maintenance of native tissues allowing for retained proprioception, lack of need for graft usage or harvest, and the potential for accelerated rehabilitation postoperatively as compared to ACL reconstruction. Short-term and early mid-term ACL repair studies have demonstrated encouraging results; however, the authors remain in favor of ACL reconstruction at this time given a dearth of long-term outcomes following ACL repair.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信