我们和他们:在一个儿科诊所,个人和团体对“接触和阅读”实施的看法和态度

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jennifer K Stone, Karen A Erickson
{"title":"我们和他们:在一个儿科诊所,个人和团体对“接触和阅读”实施的看法和态度","authors":"Jennifer K Stone, Karen A Erickson","doi":"10.1177/14687984231212722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary objective of this study was to explore clinic group culture surrounding Reach Out and Read (ROaR) at a pediatric clinic recognized as successful in ROaR implementation. In ROaR-participating clinics, pediatricians give books and information to families at well child visits to promote daily read aloud practices deemed necessary by many experts to build early literacy skills. The program is known to be most effective when implementing clinics demonstrate positive group culture, yet additional understanding of cultural elements is needed. To explore clinic group culture, we collaborated with a ROaR regional representative and a pediatrician leading high-quality ROaR implementation to create a semi-structured interview protocol regarding staff perceptions and feelings surrounding ROaR. Then we conducted the semi-structured interview with twelve non-physician staff members in the pediatrician’s clinic. A two-phase grounded theory analysis revealed an ingroup/outgroup relationship that created two distinct cultural groups related to ROaR. Participants described themselves as ingroup members and the patients receiving ROaR as outgroup members. The ingroup included community organizations, doctors, and study participants, working together to give books and information to parents and medical students, who made up the outgroup. Ingroup members assumed that outgroup members needed their services. Participants’ descriptions of literacy resources in their own family cultures were different from their descriptions of the needs they perceived of members of the outgroup. Descriptions of outgroup members’ literacy needs included multiple stereotypes that could serve to perpetuate, rather than ameliorate, existing literacy inequities. Empathy promotion within ROaR-implementing clinics is discussed as a potential strategy to increase equity.","PeriodicalId":47033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","volume":" 26","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Us and them: Individual and group perceptions and attitudes about Reach Out and Read implementation in one pediatric clinic\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer K Stone, Karen A Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14687984231212722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The primary objective of this study was to explore clinic group culture surrounding Reach Out and Read (ROaR) at a pediatric clinic recognized as successful in ROaR implementation. In ROaR-participating clinics, pediatricians give books and information to families at well child visits to promote daily read aloud practices deemed necessary by many experts to build early literacy skills. The program is known to be most effective when implementing clinics demonstrate positive group culture, yet additional understanding of cultural elements is needed. To explore clinic group culture, we collaborated with a ROaR regional representative and a pediatrician leading high-quality ROaR implementation to create a semi-structured interview protocol regarding staff perceptions and feelings surrounding ROaR. Then we conducted the semi-structured interview with twelve non-physician staff members in the pediatrician’s clinic. A two-phase grounded theory analysis revealed an ingroup/outgroup relationship that created two distinct cultural groups related to ROaR. Participants described themselves as ingroup members and the patients receiving ROaR as outgroup members. The ingroup included community organizations, doctors, and study participants, working together to give books and information to parents and medical students, who made up the outgroup. Ingroup members assumed that outgroup members needed their services. Participants’ descriptions of literacy resources in their own family cultures were different from their descriptions of the needs they perceived of members of the outgroup. Descriptions of outgroup members’ literacy needs included multiple stereotypes that could serve to perpetuate, rather than ameliorate, existing literacy inequities. Empathy promotion within ROaR-implementing clinics is discussed as a potential strategy to increase equity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"volume\":\" 26\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231212722\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231212722","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是探讨在一个被认为成功实施了“伸出和阅读”(ROaR)的儿科诊所中,围绕着“伸出和阅读”(ROaR)的临床小组文化。在参与“咆哮”计划的诊所,儿科医生在儿童探访时向家庭提供书籍和信息,以促进每天大声朗读的练习,许多专家认为这是培养早期读写技能所必需的。众所周知,当实施诊所表现出积极的群体文化时,该计划是最有效的,但需要对文化因素进行额外的了解。为了探索诊所群体文化,我们与一名ROaR区域代表和一名儿科医生合作,领导高质量的ROaR实施,创建了一份关于员工对ROaR的看法和感受的半结构化访谈协议。然后,我们对儿科诊所的12名非医师工作人员进行了半结构化访谈。两阶段扎根理论分析表明,群内/群外关系创造了两个与咆哮相关的不同文化群体。参与者将自己描述为内群体成员,而接受咆哮治疗的患者则将自己描述为外群体成员。内组包括社区组织、医生和研究参与者,他们共同向父母和医学生提供书籍和信息,这些人组成了外组。群内成员认为群外成员需要他们的服务。参与者对自己家庭文化中读写资源的描述与他们对外群体成员的需求的描述是不同的。对外群体成员扫盲需求的描述包含了多种刻板印象,这些刻板印象可能会延续而不是改善现有的扫盲不平等。在实施吼声的诊所内,共情促进作为增加公平的潜在策略进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Us and them: Individual and group perceptions and attitudes about Reach Out and Read implementation in one pediatric clinic
The primary objective of this study was to explore clinic group culture surrounding Reach Out and Read (ROaR) at a pediatric clinic recognized as successful in ROaR implementation. In ROaR-participating clinics, pediatricians give books and information to families at well child visits to promote daily read aloud practices deemed necessary by many experts to build early literacy skills. The program is known to be most effective when implementing clinics demonstrate positive group culture, yet additional understanding of cultural elements is needed. To explore clinic group culture, we collaborated with a ROaR regional representative and a pediatrician leading high-quality ROaR implementation to create a semi-structured interview protocol regarding staff perceptions and feelings surrounding ROaR. Then we conducted the semi-structured interview with twelve non-physician staff members in the pediatrician’s clinic. A two-phase grounded theory analysis revealed an ingroup/outgroup relationship that created two distinct cultural groups related to ROaR. Participants described themselves as ingroup members and the patients receiving ROaR as outgroup members. The ingroup included community organizations, doctors, and study participants, working together to give books and information to parents and medical students, who made up the outgroup. Ingroup members assumed that outgroup members needed their services. Participants’ descriptions of literacy resources in their own family cultures were different from their descriptions of the needs they perceived of members of the outgroup. Descriptions of outgroup members’ literacy needs included multiple stereotypes that could serve to perpetuate, rather than ameliorate, existing literacy inequities. Empathy promotion within ROaR-implementing clinics is discussed as a potential strategy to increase equity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Journal of Early Childhood Literacy is a fully peer-reviewed international journal. Since its foundation in 2001 JECL has rapidly become a distinctive, leading voice in research in early childhood literacy, with a multinational range of contributors and readership. The main emphasis in the journal is on papers researching issues related to the nature, function and use of literacy in early childhood. This includes the history, development, use, learning and teaching of literacy, as well as policy and strategy. Research papers may address theoretical, methodological, strategic or applied aspects of early childhood literacy and could be reviews of research issues. JECL is both a forum for debate about the topic of early childhood literacy and a resource for those working in the field. Literacy is broadly defined; JECL focuses on the 0-8 age range. Our prime interest in empirical work is those studies that are situated in authentic or naturalistic settings; this differentiates the journal from others in the area. JECL, therefore, tends to favour qualitative work but is also open to research employing quantitative methods. The journal is multi-disciplinary. We welcome submissions from diverse disciplinary backgrounds including: education, cultural psychology, literacy studies, sociology, anthropology, historical and cultural studies, applied linguistics and semiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信