联邦巡回法院重申药物安全和有效性是FDA的问题,而不是专利法的问题

IF 0.2 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMAN
{"title":"联邦巡回法院重申药物安全和有效性是FDA的问题,而不是专利法的问题","authors":"CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMAN","doi":"10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmh","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biotechnology Law ReportAhead of Print Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent LawsBy CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMANBy CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMANChristopher M. Holman is a Professor of Law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law; a Senior Scholar at the Center for Intellectual Property x Innovation Policy (C-IP) at George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School; and the Executive Editor of Biotechnology Law Report.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:25 Sep 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:By CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMAN.Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent Laws.Biotechnology Law Report.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhOnline Ahead of Print:September 25, 2023PDF download","PeriodicalId":55354,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Law Report","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent Laws\",\"authors\":\"CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMAN\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmh\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Biotechnology Law ReportAhead of Print Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent LawsBy CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMANBy CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMANChristopher M. Holman is a Professor of Law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law; a Senior Scholar at the Center for Intellectual Property x Innovation Policy (C-IP) at George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School; and the Executive Editor of Biotechnology Law Report.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:25 Sep 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:By CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMAN.Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent Laws.Biotechnology Law Report.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhOnline Ahead of Print:September 25, 2023PDF download\",\"PeriodicalId\":55354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology Law Report\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology Law Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmh\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Law Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmh","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联邦巡回法院重申药物安全和有效性是FDA的问题,而不是专利法CHRISTOPHER M. Holman CHRISTOPHER M. Holman是密苏里大学堪萨斯城法学院的法学教授;乔治梅森大学安东宁·斯卡利亚法学院知识产权与创新政策中心(C-IP)高级学者;也是《生物技术法律报告》的执行主编。搜索本文作者的更多论文出版在线:2023年9月25日https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhAboutSectionsView文章查看全文pdf /EPUB权限和引文下载CitationsTrack引文添加到收藏回到出版物共享在facebook上分享推特链接在redditemail查看文章figuresreferencesrelateddetails卷0发行0信息版权2023,Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.,出版商引用本文:by CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMAN。联邦巡回法院重申药物安全和有效性是FDA的问题,而不是专利法的问题。生物技术法律报告。打印前://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhOnline打印前:2023年9月25日pdf下载
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent Laws
Biotechnology Law ReportAhead of Print Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent LawsBy CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMANBy CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMANChristopher M. Holman is a Professor of Law at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law; a Senior Scholar at the Center for Intellectual Property x Innovation Policy (C-IP) at George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School; and the Executive Editor of Biotechnology Law Report.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:25 Sep 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhAboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail View articleFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 0Issue 0 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:By CHRISTOPHER M. HOLMAN.Federal Circuit Reiterates That Drug Safety and Efficacy Are Issues for the FDA, Not the Patent Laws.Biotechnology Law Report.ahead of printhttp://doi.org/10.1089/blr.2023.29320.cmhOnline Ahead of Print:September 25, 2023PDF download
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotechnology Law Report
Biotechnology Law Report 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading authoritative journal since 1982 devoted to the evolving body of law and government regulation concerning biotechnology, particularly in the industries in which new products from these technologies are developing the most rapidly: pharmaceuticals, chemicals, agriculture, food processing, energy, mineral recovery, and waste treatment. All legal aspects are rapidly reported, and critical and often hard-to-obtain documents are reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信