公众科学参与的人口统计:一种元分析方法

Q1 Multidisciplinary
Jazzmine K. Waugh, Jacqueline K. Lindsey, Max Z. Stewart, Jordan C. Winter, Julia K. Parrish
{"title":"公众科学参与的人口统计:一种元分析方法","authors":"Jazzmine K. Waugh, Jacqueline K. Lindsey, Max Z. Stewart, Jordan C. Winter, Julia K. Parrish","doi":"10.5334/cstp.610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizen science, defined here as the voluntary participation of the public in scientific research, has been proposed as a method of increasing diversity in science. However, it is unknown whether citizen science participants are truly more diverse than traditional (i.e., academically trained) scientists. In this paper, we conducted a meta-analysis of citizen science participant demographics (for gender, race/ethnicity, retiree participation, age, and education) across English language peer-reviewed literature in the Web of Science (WOS) database. We collected data encompassing 151,854 unique within-project participants from 157 projects. By pairing a subset of our data confined to North America (n = 21 projects) with geographically compared census data, we found that citizen science participants are disproportionately white and educated, with high variation in gender of participants across projects. The geographically compared results also suggested that participants are primarily adults. We then used linear modeling to explore whether project attributes, including publication year, scientific focus of the project (project focus), and whether the project is online or hands-on (project access), explain variation in demographics (n = 121 projects). We found an increase in female participation over time, while biodiversity projects had higher participation from white and retired people than health projects, and online projects had more female and educated participants than hands-on projects. However, only ~7.5% of citizen science papers we reviewed reported demographic data, suggesting a need for more representative data. This research suggests that there may be room for increased participation from groups that are currently underrepresented in citizen science.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demographics of Public Participation in Science: A Meta-Analytic Approach\",\"authors\":\"Jazzmine K. Waugh, Jacqueline K. Lindsey, Max Z. Stewart, Jordan C. Winter, Julia K. Parrish\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/cstp.610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Citizen science, defined here as the voluntary participation of the public in scientific research, has been proposed as a method of increasing diversity in science. However, it is unknown whether citizen science participants are truly more diverse than traditional (i.e., academically trained) scientists. In this paper, we conducted a meta-analysis of citizen science participant demographics (for gender, race/ethnicity, retiree participation, age, and education) across English language peer-reviewed literature in the Web of Science (WOS) database. We collected data encompassing 151,854 unique within-project participants from 157 projects. By pairing a subset of our data confined to North America (n = 21 projects) with geographically compared census data, we found that citizen science participants are disproportionately white and educated, with high variation in gender of participants across projects. The geographically compared results also suggested that participants are primarily adults. We then used linear modeling to explore whether project attributes, including publication year, scientific focus of the project (project focus), and whether the project is online or hands-on (project access), explain variation in demographics (n = 121 projects). We found an increase in female participation over time, while biodiversity projects had higher participation from white and retired people than health projects, and online projects had more female and educated participants than hands-on projects. However, only ~7.5% of citizen science papers we reviewed reported demographic data, suggesting a need for more representative data. This research suggests that there may be room for increased participation from groups that are currently underrepresented in citizen science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Citizen Science Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Citizen Science Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民科学,在这里被定义为公众自愿参与科学研究,被认为是增加科学多样性的一种方法。然而,尚不清楚公民科学参与者是否真的比传统的(即受过学术训练的)科学家更加多样化。在本文中,我们对公民科学参与者的人口统计数据(性别、种族/民族、退休人员参与、年龄和教育程度)进行了荟萃分析,这些数据来自Web of science (WOS)数据库中的英文同行评审文献。我们收集了来自157个项目的151,854个项目内参与者的数据。通过将我们局限于北美的数据子集(n = 21个项目)与地理上比较的人口普查数据进行配对,我们发现公民科学参与者是受过教育的白人,比例不成比例,不同项目参与者的性别差异很大。地理比较结果还表明,参与者主要是成年人。然后,我们使用线性模型来探索项目属性,包括出版年份、项目的科学重点(项目重点),以及项目是在线的还是实际操作的(项目访问),是否解释了人口统计数据的变化(n = 121个项目)。我们发现,随着时间的推移,女性的参与度有所增加,而生物多样性项目的白人和退休人员的参与度高于健康项目,在线项目的女性和受过教育的参与者多于动手项目。然而,在我们审查的公民科学论文中,只有约7.5%报告了人口统计数据,这表明需要更多具有代表性的数据。这项研究表明,目前在公民科学中代表性不足的群体可能有更多参与的空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Demographics of Public Participation in Science: A Meta-Analytic Approach
Citizen science, defined here as the voluntary participation of the public in scientific research, has been proposed as a method of increasing diversity in science. However, it is unknown whether citizen science participants are truly more diverse than traditional (i.e., academically trained) scientists. In this paper, we conducted a meta-analysis of citizen science participant demographics (for gender, race/ethnicity, retiree participation, age, and education) across English language peer-reviewed literature in the Web of Science (WOS) database. We collected data encompassing 151,854 unique within-project participants from 157 projects. By pairing a subset of our data confined to North America (n = 21 projects) with geographically compared census data, we found that citizen science participants are disproportionately white and educated, with high variation in gender of participants across projects. The geographically compared results also suggested that participants are primarily adults. We then used linear modeling to explore whether project attributes, including publication year, scientific focus of the project (project focus), and whether the project is online or hands-on (project access), explain variation in demographics (n = 121 projects). We found an increase in female participation over time, while biodiversity projects had higher participation from white and retired people than health projects, and online projects had more female and educated participants than hands-on projects. However, only ~7.5% of citizen science papers we reviewed reported demographic data, suggesting a need for more representative data. This research suggests that there may be room for increased participation from groups that are currently underrepresented in citizen science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
Citizen Science Theory and Practice Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信