生成式人工智能对图书馆工作场所和工作流程的影响

IF 1.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Mohammad Hosseini, Kristi Holmes
{"title":"生成式人工智能对图书馆工作场所和工作流程的影响","authors":"Mohammad Hosseini, Kristi Holmes","doi":"10.5860/crl.84.6.836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ChatGPT was released on November 30 th 2022, and very quickly popularized generative artificial intelligence (AI) to the extent that it is now seen as a mainstream technology and used by many. However, this mainstreaming and popularity has also resulted in a hype, thereby overwhelming us by a wide range of opinions and news related to its current and future applications. While we can test generative AI applications and read news about their added value, it might be hard to envision the short-, medium- and long-term impact of these tools on library operations, resources, and services. Reflecting on how libraries and their existing workflows are evolving alongside the rise of generative AI is intriguing, yet extremely challenging due to the rapid development of the technology. This is further complicated by the variation across each library’s organization, management, and use. Indeed, even two libraries in the same institution might have a different approach regarding collection management, curation, user engagement, and technology integration. These differences can be further amplified by library size, disciplinary focus (e.g., university library, medical library, law library), services offered (e.g., education and training, evaluation), communities served (e.g., students, medical trainees, researchers, faculty, public), overall approach to technology, as well as their budget. Each library is made up of several units with specific goals and responsibilities. The same technology may have a different impact on each department of a library, as well as each employee, depending on their role and background. As a result, despite various opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI, librarians should consider charting their own personal roadmap to learn about and familiarize themselves with this technology based on their unique circumstances, interests, and needs.","PeriodicalId":10686,"journal":{"name":"College & Research Libraries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Library Workplaces and Workflows via Generative AI\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Hosseini, Kristi Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/crl.84.6.836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ChatGPT was released on November 30 th 2022, and very quickly popularized generative artificial intelligence (AI) to the extent that it is now seen as a mainstream technology and used by many. However, this mainstreaming and popularity has also resulted in a hype, thereby overwhelming us by a wide range of opinions and news related to its current and future applications. While we can test generative AI applications and read news about their added value, it might be hard to envision the short-, medium- and long-term impact of these tools on library operations, resources, and services. Reflecting on how libraries and their existing workflows are evolving alongside the rise of generative AI is intriguing, yet extremely challenging due to the rapid development of the technology. This is further complicated by the variation across each library’s organization, management, and use. Indeed, even two libraries in the same institution might have a different approach regarding collection management, curation, user engagement, and technology integration. These differences can be further amplified by library size, disciplinary focus (e.g., university library, medical library, law library), services offered (e.g., education and training, evaluation), communities served (e.g., students, medical trainees, researchers, faculty, public), overall approach to technology, as well as their budget. Each library is made up of several units with specific goals and responsibilities. The same technology may have a different impact on each department of a library, as well as each employee, depending on their role and background. As a result, despite various opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI, librarians should consider charting their own personal roadmap to learn about and familiarize themselves with this technology based on their unique circumstances, interests, and needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"College & Research Libraries\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"College & Research Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.6.836\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College & Research Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.6.836","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ChatGPT于2022年11月30日发布,非常迅速地普及了生成式人工智能(AI),以至于它现在被视为一种主流技术并被许多人使用。然而,这种主流化和流行也导致了炒作,从而使我们被与其当前和未来应用相关的各种意见和新闻所淹没。虽然我们可以测试生成式人工智能应用程序并阅读有关其附加值的新闻,但可能很难想象这些工具对图书馆运营、资源和服务的短期、中期和长期影响。随着生成式人工智能的兴起,反思图书馆及其现有工作流程是如何演变的,这很有趣,但由于技术的快速发展,这一过程极具挑战性。由于每个库的组织、管理和使用的差异,这进一步复杂化了。事实上,即使是同一机构的两个图书馆在馆藏管理、策展、用户参与和技术集成方面也可能有不同的方法。这些差异可因图书馆规模、学科重点(如大学图书馆、医学图书馆、法律图书馆)、提供的服务(如教育和培训、评价)、服务的社区(如学生、医学学员、研究人员、教师、公众)、总体技术方法及其预算而进一步扩大。每个图书馆都由几个具有特定目标和职责的单元组成。相同的技术可能对图书馆的每个部门以及每个员工产生不同的影响,这取决于他们的角色和背景。因此,尽管生成式人工智能带来了各种机遇和挑战,图书馆员应该考虑根据自己独特的环境、兴趣和需求,绘制自己的个人路线图,以了解和熟悉这项技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution of Library Workplaces and Workflows via Generative AI
ChatGPT was released on November 30 th 2022, and very quickly popularized generative artificial intelligence (AI) to the extent that it is now seen as a mainstream technology and used by many. However, this mainstreaming and popularity has also resulted in a hype, thereby overwhelming us by a wide range of opinions and news related to its current and future applications. While we can test generative AI applications and read news about their added value, it might be hard to envision the short-, medium- and long-term impact of these tools on library operations, resources, and services. Reflecting on how libraries and their existing workflows are evolving alongside the rise of generative AI is intriguing, yet extremely challenging due to the rapid development of the technology. This is further complicated by the variation across each library’s organization, management, and use. Indeed, even two libraries in the same institution might have a different approach regarding collection management, curation, user engagement, and technology integration. These differences can be further amplified by library size, disciplinary focus (e.g., university library, medical library, law library), services offered (e.g., education and training, evaluation), communities served (e.g., students, medical trainees, researchers, faculty, public), overall approach to technology, as well as their budget. Each library is made up of several units with specific goals and responsibilities. The same technology may have a different impact on each department of a library, as well as each employee, depending on their role and background. As a result, despite various opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI, librarians should consider charting their own personal roadmap to learn about and familiarize themselves with this technology based on their unique circumstances, interests, and needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
College & Research Libraries
College & Research Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: College & Research Libraries (C&RL) is the official scholarly research journal of the Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association, 50 East Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. C&RL is a bimonthly, online-only publication highlighting a new C&RL study with a free, live, expert panel comprised of the study''s authors and additional subject experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信