反对避税的特别规定:台湾的经验

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Roman A. Shepenko
{"title":"反对避税的特别规定:台湾的经验","authors":"Roman A. Shepenko","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2023.311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"States and the territories implementation their tax rights in relation to the objects of taxation by concepts of taxation is determined. Tax conceptions to be applied primarily in relation to direct taxes are territorial and global. The territorial conception assumes that taxes are levied on the object of taxation originated or received in the state (territory). This conception is addressed to residents and non-residents. The global conception assumes that taxes are levied on the object of taxation regardless of the place of its origin. This conception is addressed to residents. Ideally, states and territories should limit their tax rights to income from national sources. Accordingly, the principle of non-double taxation will not be violated and there is no need for special rules. Initially, states and territories followed the territorial concept, but over time approaches have changed. As a result, the problem of tax avoidance has become the focus of attention. Their unilateral application does not give the desired result, and therefore international treaties are concluded or amended. Special rules against tax avoidance are on the agenda of the authorities of various states, including unrecognized ones. There is a certain specificity in the regulation in relation to unrecognized states and territories with a special status. Some of these entities are even members of international organizations, but do not have an extensive network of treaties containing tax provisions. In the given article, an attempt to systematize special rules against tax avoidance in Taiwan is made.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"2015 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special rules against tax avoidance: Taiwan’s experience\",\"authors\":\"Roman A. Shepenko\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2023.311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"States and the territories implementation their tax rights in relation to the objects of taxation by concepts of taxation is determined. Tax conceptions to be applied primarily in relation to direct taxes are territorial and global. The territorial conception assumes that taxes are levied on the object of taxation originated or received in the state (territory). This conception is addressed to residents and non-residents. The global conception assumes that taxes are levied on the object of taxation regardless of the place of its origin. This conception is addressed to residents. Ideally, states and territories should limit their tax rights to income from national sources. Accordingly, the principle of non-double taxation will not be violated and there is no need for special rules. Initially, states and territories followed the territorial concept, but over time approaches have changed. As a result, the problem of tax avoidance has become the focus of attention. Their unilateral application does not give the desired result, and therefore international treaties are concluded or amended. Special rules against tax avoidance are on the agenda of the authorities of various states, including unrecognized ones. There is a certain specificity in the regulation in relation to unrecognized states and territories with a special status. Some of these entities are even members of international organizations, but do not have an extensive network of treaties containing tax provisions. In the given article, an attempt to systematize special rules against tax avoidance in Taiwan is made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.311\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家和地区行使与征税对象有关的税收权利是由税收概念确定的。主要适用于直接税的税收概念是地域性和全球性的。地域概念假定税收是对起源于或接受于国家(领土)的征税对象征收的。这个概念适用于居民和非居民。全球概念假设税收是对征税对象征收的,而不管其起源在哪里。这个概念是针对居民的。理想情况下,各州和地区应将其征税权限制在国家来源的收入上。因此,不会违反不双重征税的原则,也不需要制定特别规则。最初,州和地区遵循领土概念,但随着时间的推移,方法发生了变化。因此,避税问题成为人们关注的焦点。它们的单方面适用不能产生预期的结果,因此缔结或修正国际条约。针对避税的特别规定已提上各国当局的议程,包括未被承认的国家。在涉及具有特殊地位的未被承认的国家和领土的规定中有一定的特殊性。其中一些实体甚至是国际组织的成员,但没有广泛的载有税收规定的条约网络。在本文中,笔者试图将台湾地区的特殊避税规则系统化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special rules against tax avoidance: Taiwan’s experience
States and the territories implementation their tax rights in relation to the objects of taxation by concepts of taxation is determined. Tax conceptions to be applied primarily in relation to direct taxes are territorial and global. The territorial conception assumes that taxes are levied on the object of taxation originated or received in the state (territory). This conception is addressed to residents and non-residents. The global conception assumes that taxes are levied on the object of taxation regardless of the place of its origin. This conception is addressed to residents. Ideally, states and territories should limit their tax rights to income from national sources. Accordingly, the principle of non-double taxation will not be violated and there is no need for special rules. Initially, states and territories followed the territorial concept, but over time approaches have changed. As a result, the problem of tax avoidance has become the focus of attention. Their unilateral application does not give the desired result, and therefore international treaties are concluded or amended. Special rules against tax avoidance are on the agenda of the authorities of various states, including unrecognized ones. There is a certain specificity in the regulation in relation to unrecognized states and territories with a special status. Some of these entities are even members of international organizations, but do not have an extensive network of treaties containing tax provisions. In the given article, an attempt to systematize special rules against tax avoidance in Taiwan is made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信