被遗忘权适用的法律框架、限制和标准:欧洲联盟的经验

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Tigran D. Oganesian
{"title":"被遗忘权适用的法律框架、限制和标准:欧洲联盟的经验","authors":"Tigran D. Oganesian","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2023.312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to be forgotten is the right of individuals to exclude, restrict or delete links and personal information on the Internet. The article focuses on the legal basis of the realization of the right to be forgotten. In this regard, the provisions of the previously existing Directive 95/46/ EC, the new EU data protection regulation, as well as the case law of the EU Court of Justice are analyzed. It is noted that despite the fact that the Directive did not directly provide for this right, nevertheless, its provisions allowed the EU Court to derive the right to be forgotten through an evolutionary interpretation. The author analyzes the doctrinal positions according to which the realization of the right to be forgotten can lead to censorship of the Internet. It is noted that if competing rights are not properly balanced, the right to be forgotten can lead to unjustified censorship on the Internet. Particular attention is paid to the legal positions of the EU Court, which in 2014, in a ruling in the Google Spain case, for the first time internationally enshrined the right to be forgotten. The arguments revealing the significance of this resolution for the subsequent realization of this right are given. With regard to extraterritorial application, it is noted that the EU Court of Justice is striving for a global application of the right to be forgotten, allowing member States to adopt more extraterritorial protective mechanisms. It is noted that until a consistent practice is formed, the right to be forgotten will continue to remain an “unpredictable” right. In conclusion, the author points out that only time is an indicator of whether the right to be forgotten can become the most effective way to establish a balance between government agencies, Internet service providers and Internet users.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal framework, limits and standards for the application of the right to be forgotten: The experience of the European Union\",\"authors\":\"Tigran D. Oganesian\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2023.312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The right to be forgotten is the right of individuals to exclude, restrict or delete links and personal information on the Internet. The article focuses on the legal basis of the realization of the right to be forgotten. In this regard, the provisions of the previously existing Directive 95/46/ EC, the new EU data protection regulation, as well as the case law of the EU Court of Justice are analyzed. It is noted that despite the fact that the Directive did not directly provide for this right, nevertheless, its provisions allowed the EU Court to derive the right to be forgotten through an evolutionary interpretation. The author analyzes the doctrinal positions according to which the realization of the right to be forgotten can lead to censorship of the Internet. It is noted that if competing rights are not properly balanced, the right to be forgotten can lead to unjustified censorship on the Internet. Particular attention is paid to the legal positions of the EU Court, which in 2014, in a ruling in the Google Spain case, for the first time internationally enshrined the right to be forgotten. The arguments revealing the significance of this resolution for the subsequent realization of this right are given. With regard to extraterritorial application, it is noted that the EU Court of Justice is striving for a global application of the right to be forgotten, allowing member States to adopt more extraterritorial protective mechanisms. It is noted that until a consistent practice is formed, the right to be forgotten will continue to remain an “unpredictable” right. In conclusion, the author points out that only time is an indicator of whether the right to be forgotten can become the most effective way to establish a balance between government agencies, Internet service providers and Internet users.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被遗忘权是指个人在互联网上排除、限制或删除链接和个人信息的权利。本文着重论述了被遗忘权实现的法律依据。在这方面,分析了之前存在的指令95/46/ EC的规定,新的欧盟数据保护条例,以及欧盟法院的判例法。值得注意的是,尽管该指令没有直接规定这一权利,但其条款允许欧盟法院通过一种渐进的解释推导出被遗忘权。作者分析了被遗忘权的实现可能导致互联网审查的理论立场。值得注意的是,如果相互竞争的权利没有得到适当的平衡,被遗忘的权利可能导致互联网上不合理的审查。尤其值得关注的是欧盟法院的法律立场。2014年,欧盟法院在对谷歌西班牙案的裁决中,首次在国际上确立了被遗忘权。文中给出了说明该决议对随后实现这一权利的重要性的论据。关于域外适用,应当指出,欧盟法院正在努力使被遗忘权在全球适用,使成员国能够采取更多的域外保护机制。委员会指出,在形成一致的做法之前,被遗忘权将继续是一项“不可预测”的权利。综上所述,作者指出,只有时间是衡量被遗忘权能否成为在政府机构、互联网服务提供商和互联网用户之间建立平衡的最有效方式的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal framework, limits and standards for the application of the right to be forgotten: The experience of the European Union
The right to be forgotten is the right of individuals to exclude, restrict or delete links and personal information on the Internet. The article focuses on the legal basis of the realization of the right to be forgotten. In this regard, the provisions of the previously existing Directive 95/46/ EC, the new EU data protection regulation, as well as the case law of the EU Court of Justice are analyzed. It is noted that despite the fact that the Directive did not directly provide for this right, nevertheless, its provisions allowed the EU Court to derive the right to be forgotten through an evolutionary interpretation. The author analyzes the doctrinal positions according to which the realization of the right to be forgotten can lead to censorship of the Internet. It is noted that if competing rights are not properly balanced, the right to be forgotten can lead to unjustified censorship on the Internet. Particular attention is paid to the legal positions of the EU Court, which in 2014, in a ruling in the Google Spain case, for the first time internationally enshrined the right to be forgotten. The arguments revealing the significance of this resolution for the subsequent realization of this right are given. With regard to extraterritorial application, it is noted that the EU Court of Justice is striving for a global application of the right to be forgotten, allowing member States to adopt more extraterritorial protective mechanisms. It is noted that until a consistent practice is formed, the right to be forgotten will continue to remain an “unpredictable” right. In conclusion, the author points out that only time is an indicator of whether the right to be forgotten can become the most effective way to establish a balance between government agencies, Internet service providers and Internet users.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信