2019冠状病毒病大流行期间澳大利亚养老金投资决策:来自养老金转换数据的见解

Mark Brimble, Ellana Loy, Kirsten MacDonald
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间澳大利亚养老金投资决策:来自养老金转换数据的见解","authors":"Mark Brimble, Ellana Loy, Kirsten MacDonald","doi":"10.3905/jwm.2023.1.224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the switches in defined contribution plan investment options made by investors in the lead-up to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We use switch timing, short-term outcomes, and investor characteristics to determine who is more and less likely to make investment decisions with seemingly “better” or “worse” outcomes. Utilizing a sample of more than 40,000 changes in asset allocations (switching decisions), we investigate the volume and timing of switch outcomes to assess the efficacy of financial decision-making during the pandemic. We find that both the risk of “worse” switches and the volume of transactions increased, along with a greater proportion of negative outcomes. Investors’ age and gender were influencing factors, with older and female investors experiencing significantly poorer switch outcomes. Additionally, perceived urgency in relation to decision-making during the crisis, combined with particular investor characteristics, may have worsened investor outcomes. We call on fund trustees and policymakers to consider strategies to support investors in making more effective switch decisions.","PeriodicalId":175460,"journal":{"name":"The journal of wealth management","volume":"BME-25 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australian Pension Investment Decisions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Pension Switch Data\",\"authors\":\"Mark Brimble, Ellana Loy, Kirsten MacDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jwm.2023.1.224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the switches in defined contribution plan investment options made by investors in the lead-up to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We use switch timing, short-term outcomes, and investor characteristics to determine who is more and less likely to make investment decisions with seemingly “better” or “worse” outcomes. Utilizing a sample of more than 40,000 changes in asset allocations (switching decisions), we investigate the volume and timing of switch outcomes to assess the efficacy of financial decision-making during the pandemic. We find that both the risk of “worse” switches and the volume of transactions increased, along with a greater proportion of negative outcomes. Investors’ age and gender were influencing factors, with older and female investors experiencing significantly poorer switch outcomes. Additionally, perceived urgency in relation to decision-making during the crisis, combined with particular investor characteristics, may have worsened investor outcomes. We call on fund trustees and policymakers to consider strategies to support investors in making more effective switch decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of wealth management\",\"volume\":\"BME-25 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of wealth management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2023.1.224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of wealth management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2023.1.224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前和期间,投资者在设定缴款计划投资选择上的转变。我们使用转换时机、短期结果和投资者特征来确定谁更有可能做出看似“更好”或“更坏”结果的投资决策。我们利用资产配置(转换决策)中超过40,000个变化的样本,调查了转换结果的数量和时间,以评估大流行期间财务决策的有效性。我们发现,“更糟糕”切换的风险和交易量都增加了,负面结果的比例也更大。投资者的年龄和性别是影响因素,年龄较大和女性投资者的转换结果明显较差。此外,在危机期间,与决策相关的紧迫感,加上投资者的特殊特征,可能会恶化投资者的结果。我们呼吁基金托管人和政策制定者考虑支持投资者做出更有效转换决策的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Australian Pension Investment Decisions during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Pension Switch Data
This article examines the switches in defined contribution plan investment options made by investors in the lead-up to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We use switch timing, short-term outcomes, and investor characteristics to determine who is more and less likely to make investment decisions with seemingly “better” or “worse” outcomes. Utilizing a sample of more than 40,000 changes in asset allocations (switching decisions), we investigate the volume and timing of switch outcomes to assess the efficacy of financial decision-making during the pandemic. We find that both the risk of “worse” switches and the volume of transactions increased, along with a greater proportion of negative outcomes. Investors’ age and gender were influencing factors, with older and female investors experiencing significantly poorer switch outcomes. Additionally, perceived urgency in relation to decision-making during the crisis, combined with particular investor characteristics, may have worsened investor outcomes. We call on fund trustees and policymakers to consider strategies to support investors in making more effective switch decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信