流域综合恢复的优化:日本和印度尼西亚管理制度的比较

Kristi Siagian, Iwan Freddy Sidabutar, Raldi Hendro Koestoer
{"title":"流域综合恢复的优化:日本和印度尼西亚管理制度的比较","authors":"Kristi Siagian, Iwan Freddy Sidabutar, Raldi Hendro Koestoer","doi":"10.61511/jpstd.v1i1.2023.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a country prone to hydrometeorological disaster and demographic problems, Japan is very concerned about integrated watershed sustainability, as a preventive and sustainable water resource in the future. In contrast to Indonesia, the rapid population growth encourages various activities in the upstream such as encroachment, conversion to agricultural land, settlements, and other economic activities causing land degradation and environmental quality to decline. The critical watershed recovery program has been carried out for a long time, but until now this problem has not been resolved. This study aims to determine the best integrated watershed management system that can be applied to accelerate the recovery of critical watersheds in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach, with a comparative descriptive method to compare watershed management in Japan and Indonesia based on a literature study. It was found that land rehabilitation activities through replanting upstream watershed areas require collaboration in comprehensive and integrated management from upstream to downstream. The practice of inter-regional cooperation and community involvement through cross-subsidized funding and joint restoration activities is a scheme that needs to be considered for accelerating watershed recovery, accompanied by the integrity of the parties and a transparent and accountable monitoring system.","PeriodicalId":477176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Placemaking and Streetscape Design","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of integrated watershed recovery: comparison of management systems in Japan and Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Kristi Siagian, Iwan Freddy Sidabutar, Raldi Hendro Koestoer\",\"doi\":\"10.61511/jpstd.v1i1.2023.184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a country prone to hydrometeorological disaster and demographic problems, Japan is very concerned about integrated watershed sustainability, as a preventive and sustainable water resource in the future. In contrast to Indonesia, the rapid population growth encourages various activities in the upstream such as encroachment, conversion to agricultural land, settlements, and other economic activities causing land degradation and environmental quality to decline. The critical watershed recovery program has been carried out for a long time, but until now this problem has not been resolved. This study aims to determine the best integrated watershed management system that can be applied to accelerate the recovery of critical watersheds in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach, with a comparative descriptive method to compare watershed management in Japan and Indonesia based on a literature study. It was found that land rehabilitation activities through replanting upstream watershed areas require collaboration in comprehensive and integrated management from upstream to downstream. The practice of inter-regional cooperation and community involvement through cross-subsidized funding and joint restoration activities is a scheme that needs to be considered for accelerating watershed recovery, accompanied by the integrity of the parties and a transparent and accountable monitoring system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":477176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Placemaking and Streetscape Design\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Placemaking and Streetscape Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61511/jpstd.v1i1.2023.184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Placemaking and Streetscape Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61511/jpstd.v1i1.2023.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一个水文气象灾害和人口问题多发的国家,日本非常关注综合流域的可持续性,作为未来的预防性和可持续性水资源。与印度尼西亚相反,人口的快速增长鼓励了上游的各种活动,如侵占、转化为农业用地、定居和其他经济活动,导致土地退化和环境质量下降。关键流域恢复工程已经实施了很长时间,但直到现在这个问题还没有得到解决。本研究旨在确定可用于加速印度尼西亚关键流域恢复的最佳综合流域管理系统。本研究在文献研究的基础上,采用定性方法和比较描述性方法对日本和印度尼西亚的流域管理进行比较。研究发现,通过在上游流域重新种植土地进行土地恢复活动,需要从上游到下游进行综合综合管理的合作。通过交叉补贴供资和联合恢复活动进行区域间合作和社区参与的做法是一项需要考虑的办法,以加速流域恢复,同时各方保持廉洁,并建立透明和负责任的监测制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimization of integrated watershed recovery: comparison of management systems in Japan and Indonesia
As a country prone to hydrometeorological disaster and demographic problems, Japan is very concerned about integrated watershed sustainability, as a preventive and sustainable water resource in the future. In contrast to Indonesia, the rapid population growth encourages various activities in the upstream such as encroachment, conversion to agricultural land, settlements, and other economic activities causing land degradation and environmental quality to decline. The critical watershed recovery program has been carried out for a long time, but until now this problem has not been resolved. This study aims to determine the best integrated watershed management system that can be applied to accelerate the recovery of critical watersheds in Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach, with a comparative descriptive method to compare watershed management in Japan and Indonesia based on a literature study. It was found that land rehabilitation activities through replanting upstream watershed areas require collaboration in comprehensive and integrated management from upstream to downstream. The practice of inter-regional cooperation and community involvement through cross-subsidized funding and joint restoration activities is a scheme that needs to be considered for accelerating watershed recovery, accompanied by the integrity of the parties and a transparent and accountable monitoring system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信