他者的形象":二十一世纪俄罗斯大众文学中的布里亚特人。

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Sesegma G. Zhambalova, Marina Ts. Tsyrenova
{"title":"他者的形象\":二十一世纪俄罗斯大众文学中的布里亚特人。","authors":"Sesegma G. Zhambalova, Marina Ts. Tsyrenova","doi":"10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-240-252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Contemporary Russian popular literature shows a trend to depict non-Russian citizens as minor and negative characters, the malign features proper being often somewhat attributed to race and ethnicity. Goals. The study provides an insight into the image of Buryats in Russian popular literature of the twenty first century, since some of the identified narratives can artificially ignite xenophobia in Russian society. Materials and methods. The article examines a variety of literary and research material, published field data collected by S. Zhambalova and N. Igaue, online sources. The employed methods comprise those of historical imagology and theory of stigmatization. Results. The considered detective novel (Taxi for an Angel) by V. Platova depicts four Buryats and one German as ‘othered’ — secondary and negative characters. Body-related portrayals are adversely supplemented with elements of Buryat mythology, religion, and ethnography. As for the work by I. Stogoff, he articulates therein some negative impressions of his stay in Buryatia. And both the literary compositions are abundant in critical accounts of Buddhism, Buddhists, and Ivolginsky Datsan. Discussion. The examined narratives are distinguished by xenophobia towards Buryats and basically contradict the state of the art, Russia’s Constitution, current nationalities policies of the Government, and may threaten interethnic relations. The bulk of Buryats are Russian citizens successfully integrated into global contexts, and the negative public stigmatization of one indigenous people attests to rudiments of the post-Soviet self-stigmatization of Russia are still there. Conclusions. Both the books are products of early twenty-first-century literature characterized by identity crisis — and bear traces of nationalism and ethnocentrism. Images of the Other attributed to Buryats are toll opinion-based, questionable, and falsify the actual present-day interethnic agenda in Russia. Like other indigenous communities, Buryats are civilized members of the contemporary world, while the manifested stigmas may adversely influence intra-nation harmony. Such publications and nation-wide self-stigmatization in Russian popular literature are definitely inadmissible.","PeriodicalId":33928,"journal":{"name":"Mongolovedenie","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"В «образе Другого»: буряты в русской массовой литературе XXI в.\",\"authors\":\"Sesegma G. Zhambalova, Marina Ts. Tsyrenova\",\"doi\":\"10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-240-252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Contemporary Russian popular literature shows a trend to depict non-Russian citizens as minor and negative characters, the malign features proper being often somewhat attributed to race and ethnicity. Goals. The study provides an insight into the image of Buryats in Russian popular literature of the twenty first century, since some of the identified narratives can artificially ignite xenophobia in Russian society. Materials and methods. The article examines a variety of literary and research material, published field data collected by S. Zhambalova and N. Igaue, online sources. The employed methods comprise those of historical imagology and theory of stigmatization. Results. The considered detective novel (Taxi for an Angel) by V. Platova depicts four Buryats and one German as ‘othered’ — secondary and negative characters. Body-related portrayals are adversely supplemented with elements of Buryat mythology, religion, and ethnography. As for the work by I. Stogoff, he articulates therein some negative impressions of his stay in Buryatia. And both the literary compositions are abundant in critical accounts of Buddhism, Buddhists, and Ivolginsky Datsan. Discussion. The examined narratives are distinguished by xenophobia towards Buryats and basically contradict the state of the art, Russia’s Constitution, current nationalities policies of the Government, and may threaten interethnic relations. The bulk of Buryats are Russian citizens successfully integrated into global contexts, and the negative public stigmatization of one indigenous people attests to rudiments of the post-Soviet self-stigmatization of Russia are still there. Conclusions. Both the books are products of early twenty-first-century literature characterized by identity crisis — and bear traces of nationalism and ethnocentrism. Images of the Other attributed to Buryats are toll opinion-based, questionable, and falsify the actual present-day interethnic agenda in Russia. Like other indigenous communities, Buryats are civilized members of the contemporary world, while the manifested stigmas may adversely influence intra-nation harmony. Such publications and nation-wide self-stigmatization in Russian popular literature are definitely inadmissible.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mongolovedenie\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mongolovedenie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-240-252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mongolovedenie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2500-1523-2023-2-240-252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。当代俄罗斯通俗文学呈现出一种将非俄罗斯公民描绘成次要的、负面的人物的趋势,这些负面的特征往往在某种程度上归因于种族和民族。的目标。该研究提供了对21世纪俄罗斯通俗文学中布里亚特人形象的深入了解,因为一些被识别的叙事可以人为地点燃俄罗斯社会的仇外情绪。材料和方法。本文考察了各种文学和研究材料,S. Zhambalova和N. Igaue收集的已发表的实地数据,以及在线资源。研究方法包括历史意象学和污名化理论。结果。V. Platova的侦探小说《出租车为天使》(Taxi for an Angel)将四个布里亚特人和一个德国人描述为“他者”——次要和消极的角色。与身体相关的描绘被布里亚特神话、宗教和民族志的元素所补充。至于I. Stogoff的作品,他在其中表达了他在布里亚特逗留期间的一些负面印象。这两部作品都有大量对佛教、佛教徒和伊沃尔金斯基禅宗的批评。讨论。所审查的叙述的特点是对布里亚特人的仇外心理,基本上与最先进的技术、俄罗斯宪法、政府目前的民族政策相抵触,并可能威胁到种族间的关系。大部分布里亚特人都是成功融入全球环境的俄罗斯公民,对一个土著民族的负面公众污名证明了后苏联时代俄罗斯自我污名化的萌芽仍然存在。结论。这两本书都是以身份危机为特征的21世纪早期文学的产物,并带有民族主义和种族中心主义的痕迹。布里亚特人的他者形象是基于观点的,有问题的,并且伪造了俄罗斯目前的实际种族间议程。与其他土著社区一样,布里亚特人是当代世界的文明成员,而明显的耻辱可能会对民族内部的和谐产生不利影响。这样的出版物和俄罗斯大众文学在全国范围内的自我污名化是绝对不可接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
В «образе Другого»: буряты в русской массовой литературе XXI в.
Introduction. Contemporary Russian popular literature shows a trend to depict non-Russian citizens as minor and negative characters, the malign features proper being often somewhat attributed to race and ethnicity. Goals. The study provides an insight into the image of Buryats in Russian popular literature of the twenty first century, since some of the identified narratives can artificially ignite xenophobia in Russian society. Materials and methods. The article examines a variety of literary and research material, published field data collected by S. Zhambalova and N. Igaue, online sources. The employed methods comprise those of historical imagology and theory of stigmatization. Results. The considered detective novel (Taxi for an Angel) by V. Platova depicts four Buryats and one German as ‘othered’ — secondary and negative characters. Body-related portrayals are adversely supplemented with elements of Buryat mythology, religion, and ethnography. As for the work by I. Stogoff, he articulates therein some negative impressions of his stay in Buryatia. And both the literary compositions are abundant in critical accounts of Buddhism, Buddhists, and Ivolginsky Datsan. Discussion. The examined narratives are distinguished by xenophobia towards Buryats and basically contradict the state of the art, Russia’s Constitution, current nationalities policies of the Government, and may threaten interethnic relations. The bulk of Buryats are Russian citizens successfully integrated into global contexts, and the negative public stigmatization of one indigenous people attests to rudiments of the post-Soviet self-stigmatization of Russia are still there. Conclusions. Both the books are products of early twenty-first-century literature characterized by identity crisis — and bear traces of nationalism and ethnocentrism. Images of the Other attributed to Buryats are toll opinion-based, questionable, and falsify the actual present-day interethnic agenda in Russia. Like other indigenous communities, Buryats are civilized members of the contemporary world, while the manifested stigmas may adversely influence intra-nation harmony. Such publications and nation-wide self-stigmatization in Russian popular literature are definitely inadmissible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mongolovedenie
Mongolovedenie Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信