媒体与法律:哪个是社会工程的工具?

Fathul Hamdani, Ana Fauzia, Rezka Mardhiyana, Lalu Aria Nata Kusuma
{"title":"媒体与法律:哪个是社会工程的工具?","authors":"Fathul Hamdani, Ana Fauzia, Rezka Mardhiyana, Lalu Aria Nata Kusuma","doi":"10.15294/imrev.v2i2.69469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to Roscoe Pound, law is viewed as a tool for social engineering. However, the situation in Indonesia reveals that the law has not effectively fulfilled its role as a tool for social engineering and development, as envisioned by Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. This is evident in various law enforcement cases in Indonesia, where the process tends to be sluggish and only gains attention after it becomes viral in the mass media. This study aims to explore the underlying factors behind the influence of mass media on law enforcement in Indonesia and investigate whether both the media and the law can function as tools for social engineering simultaneously. The article adopts a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The research findings demonstrate that while the mass media has a positive impact, there are still areas for improvement within the Indonesian legal system, particularly concerning the suboptimal performance of law enforcement officials and state authorities. Despite the potential for mutual support between the media and the law, the current scenario highlights the need for the media to serve as an information disseminator, supervisor, social control, and shaper of public opinion, while the coercive nature of the law can exert pressure on law enforcers and government officials to fulfill their duties and responsibilities.","PeriodicalId":377989,"journal":{"name":"Indonesia Media Law Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Media Vs. Law: Which Acts as a Tool of Social Engineering?\",\"authors\":\"Fathul Hamdani, Ana Fauzia, Rezka Mardhiyana, Lalu Aria Nata Kusuma\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/imrev.v2i2.69469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to Roscoe Pound, law is viewed as a tool for social engineering. However, the situation in Indonesia reveals that the law has not effectively fulfilled its role as a tool for social engineering and development, as envisioned by Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. This is evident in various law enforcement cases in Indonesia, where the process tends to be sluggish and only gains attention after it becomes viral in the mass media. This study aims to explore the underlying factors behind the influence of mass media on law enforcement in Indonesia and investigate whether both the media and the law can function as tools for social engineering simultaneously. The article adopts a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The research findings demonstrate that while the mass media has a positive impact, there are still areas for improvement within the Indonesian legal system, particularly concerning the suboptimal performance of law enforcement officials and state authorities. Despite the potential for mutual support between the media and the law, the current scenario highlights the need for the media to serve as an information disseminator, supervisor, social control, and shaper of public opinion, while the coercive nature of the law can exert pressure on law enforcers and government officials to fulfill their duties and responsibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesia Media Law Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesia Media Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/imrev.v2i2.69469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesia Media Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/imrev.v2i2.69469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据罗斯科·庞德的说法,法律被视为社会工程的工具。然而,印度尼西亚的情况表明,法律并没有像Mochtar Kusumaatmadja所设想的那样,有效地发挥其作为社会工程和发展工具的作用。这在印度尼西亚的各种执法案件中很明显,在那里,执法过程往往迟缓,只有在大众媒体上传播开来后才引起人们的注意。本研究旨在探讨大众媒体对印尼执法的影响背后的潜在因素,并调查媒体和法律是否可以同时作为社会工程的工具。本文采用规范的法律研究方法,利用成文法、概念和案例为基础的方法。研究结果表明,虽然大众传播媒介有积极的影响,但印度尼西亚法律制度内仍有有待改进的地方,特别是执法官员和国家当局的表现欠佳。尽管媒体和法律之间存在相互支持的潜力,但目前的情况突出了媒体作为信息传播者、监督者、社会控制和舆论塑造者的需要,而法律的强制性可以对执法人员和政府官员施加压力,以履行其职责和责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Media Vs. Law: Which Acts as a Tool of Social Engineering?
According to Roscoe Pound, law is viewed as a tool for social engineering. However, the situation in Indonesia reveals that the law has not effectively fulfilled its role as a tool for social engineering and development, as envisioned by Mochtar Kusumaatmadja. This is evident in various law enforcement cases in Indonesia, where the process tends to be sluggish and only gains attention after it becomes viral in the mass media. This study aims to explore the underlying factors behind the influence of mass media on law enforcement in Indonesia and investigate whether both the media and the law can function as tools for social engineering simultaneously. The article adopts a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The research findings demonstrate that while the mass media has a positive impact, there are still areas for improvement within the Indonesian legal system, particularly concerning the suboptimal performance of law enforcement officials and state authorities. Despite the potential for mutual support between the media and the law, the current scenario highlights the need for the media to serve as an information disseminator, supervisor, social control, and shaper of public opinion, while the coercive nature of the law can exert pressure on law enforcers and government officials to fulfill their duties and responsibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信