免除刑事责任与法院罚款:应用趋势与发展前景

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
Nina Yu. Skripchenko, Svetlana V. Anoshchenkova
{"title":"免除刑事责任与法院罚款:应用趋势与发展前景","authors":"Nina Yu. Skripchenko, Svetlana V. Anoshchenkova","doi":"10.21638/spbu14.2023.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes statistical data reflecting the trends in the implementation of exemption from criminal liability with the appointment of a judicial fine. It has been established that the legislative expansion in 2016 of the exempting norms was reflected not in the level of their application, but in the structure. The crisis phenomena in the economy that emerged in 2020, provoked by COVID-19 restrictions, slowed down the growth in the application of Art. 76.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, achieved by reducing the level of implementation of Art. 76 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Expansion Art. 76.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation contributed to the broad interpretation of the terms of application by the Ruling of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. By allowing any actions of the perpetrator to be classified as compensatory, provided that they are legal and do not infringe on the rights of third parties, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation laid the foundation for the “reassessment” of the actual circumstances from active repentance or reconciliation with the victim to compensation for damage and allowed the extension of exempting norms to persons who have committed acts that harm the public interest. Sharing the desire of the legislator to reduce the repressiveness of the criminal law, it is necessary to keep the institution of exemption from criminal liability of an exceptional nature by limiting the possibility of its application in relation to criminal acts that pose a threat to national security. The results of the study give reason to doubt the expediency of further regulatory expansion of the institution under consideration. The best option for reducing the share of crime is reasonable criminalization and adequate penalization of socially dangerous acts.","PeriodicalId":41041,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exemption from criminal liability with the appointment of a court fine: Application trends and development prospects\",\"authors\":\"Nina Yu. Skripchenko, Svetlana V. Anoshchenkova\",\"doi\":\"10.21638/spbu14.2023.304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes statistical data reflecting the trends in the implementation of exemption from criminal liability with the appointment of a judicial fine. It has been established that the legislative expansion in 2016 of the exempting norms was reflected not in the level of their application, but in the structure. The crisis phenomena in the economy that emerged in 2020, provoked by COVID-19 restrictions, slowed down the growth in the application of Art. 76.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, achieved by reducing the level of implementation of Art. 76 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Expansion Art. 76.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation contributed to the broad interpretation of the terms of application by the Ruling of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. By allowing any actions of the perpetrator to be classified as compensatory, provided that they are legal and do not infringe on the rights of third parties, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation laid the foundation for the “reassessment” of the actual circumstances from active repentance or reconciliation with the victim to compensation for damage and allowed the extension of exempting norms to persons who have committed acts that harm the public interest. Sharing the desire of the legislator to reduce the repressiveness of the criminal law, it is necessary to keep the institution of exemption from criminal liability of an exceptional nature by limiting the possibility of its application in relation to criminal acts that pose a threat to national security. The results of the study give reason to doubt the expediency of further regulatory expansion of the institution under consideration. The best option for reducing the share of crime is reasonable criminalization and adequate penalization of socially dangerous acts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University-Law-Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta-Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2023.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了反映以罚款免除刑事责任制度实施趋势的统计数据。可以确定的是,2016年豁免规范的立法扩展并不体现在其适用层面,而是体现在其结构上。2019冠状病毒病限制措施引发的2020年经济危机现象减缓了《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第76.2条适用范围的增长,这是通过降低《俄罗斯联邦刑法》第76条的执行水平实现的。《俄罗斯联邦刑法典》第76.2条有助于俄罗斯联邦最高法院主席团的裁决对适用条件的广泛解释。俄罗斯联邦最高法院允许将犯罪者的任何行为归类为补偿性行为,只要这些行为是合法的并且不侵犯第三方的权利,就为“重新评估”实际情况奠定了基础,从主动忏悔或与受害者和解到赔偿损害,并允许将豁免准则扩大到犯有损害公共利益行为的人。与立法者希望减少刑法的压制性一样,有必要通过限制其在对国家安全构成威胁的犯罪行为中适用的可能性,使刑事责任豁免制度具有例外性质。这项研究的结果使我们有理由怀疑进一步扩大所考虑的机构的监管是否合适。减少犯罪比例的最佳选择是对社会危险行为进行合理的刑事定罪和适当的惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exemption from criminal liability with the appointment of a court fine: Application trends and development prospects
The article analyzes statistical data reflecting the trends in the implementation of exemption from criminal liability with the appointment of a judicial fine. It has been established that the legislative expansion in 2016 of the exempting norms was reflected not in the level of their application, but in the structure. The crisis phenomena in the economy that emerged in 2020, provoked by COVID-19 restrictions, slowed down the growth in the application of Art. 76.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, achieved by reducing the level of implementation of Art. 76 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Expansion Art. 76.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation contributed to the broad interpretation of the terms of application by the Ruling of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. By allowing any actions of the perpetrator to be classified as compensatory, provided that they are legal and do not infringe on the rights of third parties, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation laid the foundation for the “reassessment” of the actual circumstances from active repentance or reconciliation with the victim to compensation for damage and allowed the extension of exempting norms to persons who have committed acts that harm the public interest. Sharing the desire of the legislator to reduce the repressiveness of the criminal law, it is necessary to keep the institution of exemption from criminal liability of an exceptional nature by limiting the possibility of its application in relation to criminal acts that pose a threat to national security. The results of the study give reason to doubt the expediency of further regulatory expansion of the institution under consideration. The best option for reducing the share of crime is reasonable criminalization and adequate penalization of socially dangerous acts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信