建设的原因

IF 1.1 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Kantian Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1017/s1369415423000225

Sofie Møller

{"title":"建设的原因","authors":"Sofie Møller","doi":"10.1017/s1369415423000225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In The Architectonic of Reason , Lea Ypi provides an illuminating and innovative interpretation of the Architectonic in the first Critique . Ypi argues that Kant’s project of uniting practical and theoretical uses of reason in a critical metaphysics ultimately fails because practical reason does not have its own domain in which to legislate. This article challenges Ypi’s objection to practical reason’s lack of a domain in the first Critique . Its main contention is that reason’s need for unity in legislation may be satisfied by a belief in God as a necessary practical presupposition rather than a dogmatic metaphysical reality.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing Reason\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Møller\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1369415423000225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In The Architectonic of Reason , Lea Ypi provides an illuminating and innovative interpretation of the Architectonic in the first Critique . Ypi argues that Kant’s project of uniting practical and theoretical uses of reason in a critical metaphysics ultimately fails because practical reason does not have its own domain in which to legislate. This article challenges Ypi’s objection to practical reason’s lack of a domain in the first Critique . Its main contention is that reason’s need for unity in legislation may be satisfied by a belief in God as a necessary practical presupposition rather than a dogmatic metaphysical reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kantian Review\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kantian Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415423000225\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kantian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1369415423000225","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在《理性的建筑学》一书中，李·伊皮对《第一批判》中的建筑学进行了富有启发性和创新性的阐释。伊皮认为，康德在批判形而上学中统一理性的实践和理论用途的计划最终失败了，因为实践理性没有自己的立法领域。本文挑战了伊皮对实践理性在第一批判中缺乏域的反对。它的主要论点是，理性在立法中对统一性的需要，可以通过相信上帝作为必要的实践前提而不是教条的形而上学现实来满足。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Constructing Reason

Abstract In The Architectonic of Reason , Lea Ypi provides an illuminating and innovative interpretation of the Architectonic in the first Critique . Ypi argues that Kant’s project of uniting practical and theoretical uses of reason in a critical metaphysics ultimately fails because practical reason does not have its own domain in which to legislate. This article challenges Ypi’s objection to practical reason’s lack of a domain in the first Critique . Its main contention is that reason’s need for unity in legislation may be satisfied by a belief in God as a necessary practical presupposition rather than a dogmatic metaphysical reality.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.